• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Ilhan Omar the 'Antisemite of the Year'?

Is Ilhan Omar the 'Antisemite of the Year'?


  • Total voters
    45
Omar is definitely an antisemitic piece of crap but it's hard to imagine her being the 'Antisemite of the Year' over, say, people who've literally murdered Jews just for being Jews...

What is hard to imagine is why you guys think she hates Jews.
 
That proves it?

Red Herring... you said that it was hard to imagine why "you guys" think that she hates Jews... well, I have shown that even her own party has voted on resolutions denouncing hate speech following controversial comments by her. That means that it is not hard to imagine why people think that she hates Jews. Not hard to imagine in the slightest. :shrug:
 
Red Herring... you said that it was hard to imagine why "you guys" think that she hates Jews... well, I have shown that even her own party has voted on resolutions denouncing hate speech following controversial comments by her. That means that it is not hard to imagine why people think that she hates Jews. Not hard to imagine in the slightest. :shrug:

Your article even said she wasn't named.
 
Your article even said she wasn't named.

Sure... a coincidence then. :lol:

It is not like there are no good reasons for not naming a person. The Houston Astro's players that were caught cheating in sign-stealing were not individually or publicly named by MLB... so that means that they are not guilty of stealing signs, right? :lol:
 
Sure... a coincidence then. :lol:

It is not like there are no good reasons for not naming a person. The Houston Astro's players that were caught cheating in sign-stealing were not individually or publicly named by MLB... so that means that they are not guilty of stealing signs, right? :lol:

Your concession is accepted. Better luck next time. :lol:

BTW, welcome back!
 
This thread has everything. Shoutouts to holocaust deniers. Complaining they're not allowed to be antisemites without consequence. CTs about Jews controlling our politics.



Not even trying to be subtle.



.
.
.
.


Я Баба Яга [emoji328]
 
If you call your admission that Omar wasn't named a win, sure. ;)

Have you not learnt that you cannot play red Herrings with me and hope to win? lol
 
Have you not learnt that you cannot play red Herrings with me and hope to win? lol

Okay I'll bite a red herring (which is delicious by the way), and tell me why it is a red Herring.
 
Yes you won by admitting. You won since the beginning by proving my case.

What I love about you is that even when you have absolutely no argument at all you dare to admit that you have one. Lol the funniest stuff I've ever seen
 
What I love about you is that even when you have absolutely no argument at all you dare to admit that you have one. Lol the funniest stuff I've ever seen

And I love the fact that you play Devil's Advocate.

Our argument:

You: "They passed the Antisemitism bill because of Omar." *Posts a link thinking it proves his argument.*
Me: "Uh the article said they admit that Omar wasn't named but somehow they KNEW it was because of Omar."
You: "Oh it's too much of a coincidence! I win!"
 
Antisemites are in such short supply, you have to take what you can get.

Brilliant. That is exactly the conundrum that groups like the ADL face, when they've admitted that North America is the least antisemitic region in the world, yet it's also where all of their donations come from. So they're in a position of needing antisemitism to occur in order to stay in business, which is why the criteria for what antisemitism is needs to constantly expand to Orwellian levels of absurdity.




:lamo:lamo:lamo
 
Brilliant. That is exactly the conundrum that groups like the ADL face, when they've admitted that North America is the least antisemitic region in the world, yet it's also where all of their donations come from. So they're in a position of needing antisemitism to occur in order to stay in business, which is why the criteria for what antisemitism is needs to constantly expand to Orwellian levels of absurdity.

Orwellian levels like shootings in a Synagogue?

Hate inspired swastikas on homes and other places?
 
Orwellian levels like shootings in a Synagogue?

Hate inspired swastikas on homes and other places?

"the criteria for what antisemitism is needs to constantly expand to Orwellian levels of absurdity."

I'm pretty sure that shooting up a synagogue has always been judged as an antisemitic act. What's Orwellian about the current status of the ADL, is their classifying criticism of lobbyists as antisemitism. Or the self determination of abandoning the practice of male circumcision as antisemitic. When these diminutive smear merchants delve into such issues while acting as though they're battling Nazis, most of us see through their fraud.
 
She's not the worst, but still should be kicked in the throat.
 
She's not the worst, but still should be kicked in the throat.

Yet another low-key, non-violent 'conservative' adding his two cents.
 
Back
Top Bottom