There is no crime...
... have Democrats bused their power?
Oh yes.
No.
Well, Obviously the Democrats feel there was a crime
There is no crime...
... have Democrats bused their power?
Oh yes.
No.
Had Obama done what Trump did, Zimmer would have been advocating that Obama immediately be put in jail. But since Zimmer posts nothing but partisan garbage, we know his comments are completely hypocritical. Zimmer is the typical trump support, Trump before America. He hates America and loves Trump above all like his own little god.
Yes, there were multiple crimes Trump has even publicly admitted to and at least half a dozen of his closest associates are sitting in prison after being convicted for serious crimes.
Had Obama done what Trump did, Zimmer would have been advocating that Obama immediately be put in jail. But since Zimmer posts nothing but partisan garbage, we know his comments are completely hypocritical. Zimmer is the typical trump support, Trump before America. He hates America and loves Trump above all like his own little god.
Yes, there were multiple crimes Trump has even publicly admitted to and at least half a dozen of his closest associates are sitting in prison after being convicted for serious crimes.
There is no crime...
... have Democrats bused their power?
Oh yes.
No.
:alert:alert:alert
Irony Avalanche Warning
Had Obama done what Trump did, Zimmer would have been advocating that Obama immediately be put in jail. But since Zimmer posts nothing but partisan garbage, we know his comments are completely hypocritical. Zimmer is the typical trump support, Trump before America. He hates America and loves Trump above all like his own little god.
Officer, he was speeding too. Yep, that's an excuse for sure.
As for the poll, see, it all depends on the question to rig a poll. I think the Dems had every right to do what is within their power. Is what they are doing politically motivated? Absolutely
Oh look, how childish of a post from you, even has emoticons like you think it's clever, how precious of you con. Sad that you can't even admit you are a con and have to hide it by putting "other" when we know you are Trump before country. Have you saluted your Trump cutout this morning like a good little fascist con?
LOL
"....posts nothing but partisan garbage, we know his comments are completely hypocritical."
:2wave:
There is no crime...
... have Democrats bused their power?
Oh yes.
No.
Process crimes unrelated to anything the President did. Why is this fact always left out?
Well, they have the power to do what they are doing. Exercising the power that they have can't be called abuse.
Have they abused the process the Constitution grants them?
Without question.
Dershowitz has been out there saying this impeachment is not according to the Constitutional powers that are delegated, and he's something of an intelligent lawyer.
In any case, the Federalist Papers make it pretty clear the impeachment power was not supposed to be used for political disagreements. It sure feels like that's what this is to me. It all has a Stalinesque "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" feel. It doesn't help that they've been squealing about impeachment since election day, long before any of the stuff they're supposedly impeaching him for happened.
A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself. The prosecution of them, for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
Impeachment, as laid out in the constitution, is a purely political process.
And from Federalist 65:
I want him to win a second term, but I worry they attempt assassination. Nothing would surprise me with these psychopaths.Agreed, at the same time, the charges that they are pressing don't really have much of a criminal feel to them. I maintain my argument that this is all a sideshow to get people from seeing how ****ty their noms are (at least partially).
Agreed, at the same time, the charges that they are pressing don't really have much of a criminal feel to them. I maintain my argument that this is all a sideshow to get people from seeing how ****ty their noms are (at least partially).
Wow, it appears you got the right quote but interpreted exactly wrong.
When Hamilton says:
in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
He's saying that's a BAD thing. Something they did not want to happen.
He was arguing for real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.
I want him to win a second term, but I worry they attempt assassination. Nothing would surprise me with these psychopaths.
I want him to win a second term, but I worry they attempt assassination.