• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How intolerant is the Left becoming...

How intolerant is the Left becoming...


  • Total voters
    82
So you don't understand how debates work... got it.

Do you actually think that a person arguing one side of a political argument makes that person partisan? Are you able to debate the topic now instead of trying to insult me (very weakly, I might add). Basic logic would dictate that you find out a person's ideology and posting history before labeling them.

No but the person proposing a partisan debate point might make that person a partisan. And if calling you a partisan is an insult, basic logic dictates that hypersensitivity is a problem of yours not mine.
 
The **** are you on about? We are talking about Kurds who helped us fight those who throw gay people off rooftops.

The **** are you on about? We are talking about Kurds who helped us fight those who throw gay people off rooftops.

Yes the Kurds are fighting jihadist mercenaries that we and our allies have either trained and/or funded.

Mujahideen - Wikipedia

Many Muslims from other countries assisted the various mujahideen groups in Afghanistan. Some groups of these veterans became significant players in later conflicts in and around the Muslim world. Osama bin Laden, originally from a wealthy family in Saudi Arabia, was a prominent organizer and financier of an all-Arab Islamist group of foreign volunteers; his Maktab al-Khadamat funnelled money, arms, and Muslim fighters from around the Muslim world into Afghanistan, with the assistance and support of the Saudi and Pakistani governments.[12]These foreign fighters became known as "Afghan Arabs" and their efforts were coordinated by Abdullah Yusuf Azzam.

Although the mujahideen were aided by the Pakistani, U.S., and Saudi governments, the mujahideen's primary source of funding was private donors and religious charities throughout the Muslim world—particularly in the Persian Gulf. Jason Burke recounts that "as little as 25 per cent of the money for the Afghan jihad was actually supplied directly by states."

Considering we give funding and weapons to a lot of our ""allies"" that support jihadist mercenaries, that fight for anyone that will pay them, we literally created ISIS.

There's no accountability for the funding, weapons and aid we give to these various groups, that's why Turkey, Syria and Russia are rightfully claiming we fund ISIS, Kurdish terrorist, ect.

I don't understand how you can prove to be this ignorant and still operate a computer.

You shouldn't be making comments like that after posting a steaming pile of BS.

If you know absolutely nothing about the Kurds, Muslims, or other subjects, why not take some good advice and shut your ****ing mouth?

How about you take your own advice and stop embarrassing the Marine Corps. I guess they really lowered their standards, sad.

For example: You call them "faggots" and then accuse them of tossing gays off of roofs. Why would "faggots" hate gays? Seems a very dumb thing to declare.

Faggot (slang) - Wikipedia

Through ethnographic research in a high school setting, CJ Pascoe examined how American high school boys used the term fag during the early 2000s. Pascoe's work suggested that these boys used the fag epithet as a way to assert their own masculinity, by claiming that another boy is less masculine.

The Think Before You Speak campaign has sought to stop fag and gay being used as generic insults.

I would claim you're feigning ignorance but I don't think you're pretending.

The Kurds were absolutely our allies and have been well before 9/11.

No they're not. They're the allies of corrupt administrations and boot lickers like yourself.
 
Yes the Kurds are fighting jihadist mercenaries that we and our allies have either trained and/or funded.

Mujahideen - Wikipedia



Considering we give funding and weapons to a lot of our ""allies"" that support jihadist mercenaries, that fight for anyone that will pay them, we literally created ISIS.

There's no accountability for the funding, weapons and aid we give to these various groups, that's why Turkey, Syria and Russia are rightfully claiming we fund ISIS, Kurdish terrorist, ect.



You shouldn't be making comments like that after posting a steaming pile of BS.



How about you take your own advice and stop embarrassing the Marine Corps. I guess they really lowered their standards, sad.



Faggot (slang) - Wikipedia



I would claim you're feigning ignorance but I don't think you're pretending.



No they're not. They're the allies of corrupt administrations and boot lickers like yourself.

No evidence whatsoever to back your point about the Kurds. Were done.
 
It was President George W. Bush who signed the Status of Forces agreement in 2008, which planned for all American troops to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.

"The agreement lays out a framework for the withdrawal of American forces in Iraq — a withdrawal that is possible because of the success of the surge," Bush said in a joint press conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki at the time.
(from Wikipedia)

So you feel Obama was not smart enough to assess the situation as it was at the time and make the proper adjustments to policy? Don't you think that in times of conflict that the situation might change over the period of years?
 
Yes the Kurds are fighting jihadist mercenaries that we and our allies have either trained and/or funded.

Mujahideen - Wikipedia



Considering we give funding and weapons to a lot of our ""allies"" that support jihadist mercenaries, that fight for anyone that will pay them, we literally created ISIS.

I assure you that my knowledge far surpasses your layman's attempt to understand difficult things as you funnel them through your partisan garbage. And "literally" has a meaning. "ISIS," officially known as IS since 2014 by the way, originates to 1998(9), opposed the Jordanian government that we supported, and was not "literally" created by us. After Obama dismissed Pentagon advice and prematurely pulled my kind out without any sense of political muscle, the Shia government began shoving Sunni representation out, thus instigating widespread tribal conflict, which created an environment for IS to exploit and build.

Anyway, since you are at least trying to be more than what your prior post demonstrated, we have long armed our enemies and provided support towards allies who supported our enemies. For example, while Iran, Russia, and India were fighting al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan during the 1990s, we were supporting Pakistan, who was supporting the Taliban. Before this, we used those foreign religious fighters to repel the Soviet Union from Afghanistan. And long before this, we supported the Soviet Union and Ho Chi Minh during World War II against Germany and Japan. Such is diplomacy, warfare, and the idiocy of nations to see only the immediate future without considering the consequences.

The Kurds are not these people and we did betray them. And yet again, we see the idiocy of a nation to see only the immediate future without considering the consequences. Trump, against Pentagon advice, has prematurely pulled my kind out, leaving the Turks, Iran, and Russia to shape the region at the Kurds expense, which will present room for IS. You, in turn, support it simply because Trump told you to. You are just another nobody who received FOX News spin and goes on to promote himself as knowing anything beyond a splinter's worth of information.


There's no accountability for the funding, weapons and aid we give to these various groups, that's why Turkey, Syria and Russia are rightfully claiming we fund ISIS, Kurdish terrorist, ect.

"Kurdish terrorists" is Turkish, Iraqi, Syrian, and Iranian propaganda. They are the single largest concentration of an ethnic group on the planet....without a country. For decades, the Syrian, Iraqi, Iranian, and Turkish governments have oppressed and slaughtered them. Their reactions to defend themselves have earned them the title "terrorists" from these decrepit governments. By betraying them, we handed them over to even our enemies.


How about you take your own advice and stop embarrassing the Marine Corps. I guess they really lowered their standards, sad.

Well, I have the ability to use my brain and can apply reason, logic, and common sense to the historical record rather than spew venom and ignorance while ignoring the historical record. This is what a Marine is.

You, on the other hand, have demonstrated a lack of standards in your zeal to celebrate ignorance and venom. Conspiracy and shallow understanding is where people like you swim. For example...



...even after looking at the definition you still can't see how entirely stupid this was. Faggot - "a pejorative term used chiefly in North America primarily to refer to a gay male." Do you need to know what pejorative means too? - "expressing contempt or disapproval."

In other words, you demonstrated clear contempt for people who would throw gay men off of roofs by calling them "faggots." As Trump would write in a Tweet, and as you aptly proved above to be an audience of..."sad."


I would claim you're feigning ignorance but I don't think you're pretending.

...and what was that definition of "faggot" again? Maybe we should define "ignorance" for you too.


No they're not. They're the allies of corrupt administrations and boot lickers like yourself.

Say's the guy who can't stick Donald Trump's corrupt boots far enough down his throat. Again, you are absolutely ignorant of the Kurds and apparently simple meanings. You have proved this for all to read in two posts.
 
Last edited:
No evidence whatsoever to back your point about the Kurds. Were done.

Sigh... Let me help you get up to speed on the situation.

We fund and support the SDF(Syrian Democratic Forces) which is comprised of People's Protection Units (YPG). People's Protection Units (YPG) is part of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

Syrian Democratic Forces - Wikipedia

The SDF is militarily led by the People's Protection Units (YPG), a mostly Kurdish militia.

According to United States Army Special Forces Commander General Raymond A. Thomas at the Aspen Security Forum in July 2017, the SDF is a PR-friendly name for the YPG, which Thomas personally suggested because the YPG is considered an arm of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is designated as a terrorist group by the Federal government of the United States.[111][112] American Defense Secretary Ashton Carter confirmed "substantial ties" between the PYD/YPG and the PKK.[113] Testifying to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Congress, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, the top U.S. intelligence official, explicitly defined the YPG as the "PKK's militia force in Syria”.[114][115]

People's Protection Units - Wikipedia

The Syrian Democratic Forces was established in Hasakah on 11 October 2015. It has its origins in the YPG-FSA collaboration against ISIL, which had previously led to the establishment of the Euphrates Volcano joint operations room in 2014.

Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)

However, the full-scale insurgency did not begin until 15 August 1984, when the PKK announced a Kurdish uprising.

Kurdish nationalism - Wikipedia

More info on the subject^^^
 
I assure you that my knowledge far surpasses your layman's attempt to understand difficult .

This might be difficult for someone like you to understand but this is a very simple subject even my retarded ass understands and thanks for starting your post off with **** I already know.

"Kurdish terrorists" is Turkish, Iraqi, Syrian, and Iranian propaganda.

That's an interesting interpretation of the situation.

Syrian Democratic Forces - Wikipedia

According to United States Army Special Forces Commander General Raymond A. Thomas at the Aspen Security Forum in July 2017, the SDF is a PR-friendly name for the YPG, which Thomas personally suggested because the YPG is considered an arm of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is designated as a terrorist group by the Federal government of the United States.[111][112] American Defense Secretary Ashton Carter confirmed "substantial ties" between the PYD/YPG and the PKK.[113] Testifying to the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee Congress, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats, the top U.S. intelligence official, explicitly defined the YPG as the "PKK's militia force in Syria”.[114][115]

FYI, your talking to someone that considers Mugabe, Mandela and their commie comrades to be terrorist.
 
I assure you that my knowledge far surpasses your layman's attempt to understand difficult things as you funnel them through your partisan garbage. And "literally" has a meaning. "ISIS," officially known as IS since 2014 by the way, originates to 1998(9), opposed the Jordanian government that we supported, and was not "literally" created by us. After Obama dismissed Pentagon advice and prematurely pulled my kind out without any sense of political muscle, the Shia government began shoving Sunni representation out, thus instigating widespread tribal conflict, which created an environment for IS to exploit and build.

Anyway, since you are at least trying to be more than what your prior post demonstrated, we have long armed our enemies and provided support towards allies who supported our enemies. For example, while Iran, Russia, and India were fighting al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan during the 1990s, we were supporting Pakistan, who was supporting the Taliban. Before this, we used those foreign religious fighters to repel the Soviet Union from Afghanistan. And long before this, we supported the Soviet Union and Ho Chi Minh during World War II against Germany and Japan. Such is diplomacy, warfare, and the idiocy of nations to see only the immediate future without considering the consequences.

The Kurds are not these people and we did betray them. And yet again, we see the idiocy of a nation to see only the immediate future without considering the consequences. Trump, against Pentagon advice, has prematurely pulled my kind out, leaving the Turks, Iran, and Russia to shape the region at the Kurds expense, which will present room for IS. You, in turn, support it simply because Trump told you to. You are just another nobody who received FOX News spin and goes on to promote himself as knowing anything beyond a splinter's worth of information.




"Kurdish terrorists" is Turkish, Iraqi, Syrian, and Iranian propaganda. They are the single largest concentration of an ethnic group on the planet....without a country. For decades, the Syrian, Iraqi, Iranian, and Turkish governments have oppressed and slaughtered them. Their reactions to defend themselves have earned them the title "terrorists" from these decrepit governments. By betraying them, we handed them over to even our enemies.




Well, I have the ability to use my brain and can apply reason, logic, and common sense to the historical record rather than spew venom and ignorance while ignoring the historical record. This is what a Marine is.

You, on the other hand, have demonstrated a lack of standards in your zeal to celebrate ignorance and venom. Conspiracy and shallow understanding is where people like you swim. For example...




...even after looking at the definition you still can't see how entirely stupid this was. Faggot - "a pejorative term used chiefly in North America primarily to refer to a gay male." Do you need to know what pejorative means too? - "expressing contempt or disapproval."

In other words, you demonstrated clear contempt for people who would throw gay men off of roofs by calling them "faggots." As Trump would write in a Tweet, and as you aptly proved above to be an audience of..."sad."




...and what was that definition of "faggot" again? Maybe we should define "ignorance" for you too.




Say's the guy who can't stick Donald Trump's corrupt boots far enough down his throat. Again, you are absolutely ignorant of the Kurds and apparently simple meanings. You have proved this for all to read in two posts.

While I don't agree with Trump's withdraw, I do agree that we are not the world's policeman and we need to get out of these clusters. It has also happened many times before. Examples would be The Bay of Pigs Invasion, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and many others.

You are incorrect about the Kruds. The situation they have created would be like Mexicans coming into the United States and occupying Texas and claiming it is now Little Mexico. They have moved into Turkey, Iraq and Syria, taken large swaths of land, refused to accept the cultures of the host countries and killed thousands. In fact, a large faction of the Kurdish people have been deemed terrorists by most of the Western world. "the PKK has been designated as "terrorist" organization by Turkey,[17] the United States, 28 European countries, and Japan.[18] "

Your assertion that we betrayed the Kurds is BS. We have no treaty with them. We fought a common enemy together. They used this as an excuse to annex more land. They prodded an enemy they have been fighting for 40 years hoping to avoid retribution by hiding behind American soldiers.

You can also get off your high horse. You are not the only person who has served in the military.
 
There are hundreds of anti-Trump threads... this is not one of them. Post about this topic.

What topic? People are people and they have opinions that they are still free to share. Is that a problem for you? Why should we fear a diversity of opinions?
 
Sigh... Let me help you get up to speed on the situation.

We fund and support the SDF(Syrian Democratic Forces) which is comprised of People's Protection Units (YPG). People's Protection Units (YPG) is part of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

Syrian Democratic Forces - Wikipedia



People's Protection Units - Wikipedia



Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)



Kurdish nationalism - Wikipedia

More info on the subject^^^

This is wrong headed, ignorant, and your info lacks historical context.

The entire point of the YPG is to defend their own against the historically documented abuses of the Iraqi and Turkish government. It began in 2004 after youths declared their support for Bush against Saddam Hussein's former Iraq, which gassed them and slaughtered them. It was Turkey that later designated the YPG as a simple "terrorist" organization, because it has long sought to oppress and obliterate the Kurds on their side of the border too. AND they knew such rhetoric would resonate with American ears who know next to nothing outside their own borders. And since Turkey is a NATO member, some U.S. officials allowed for the rhetoric. The Russians did the same thing when it cam to their oppressed and widely abused Muslim province. However, this did not stop us from using the Kurds for exactly what they have always been - allies who the Turks, the Iraqis, the Iranians, and the Syrians hate.

This game to brand the Kurds as an enemy is just a political tactic to exonerate yet another Trump fumble. And his mission to "remove us from the Middle East" is just the latest deceit to falsely exonerate himself, especially considering that he just dropped troops in Saudi Arabia...the excuse that Osama Bin Laden used for 9/11 in the first place.
 
While I don't agree with Trump's withdraw, I do agree that we are not the world's policeman and we need to get out of these clusters. It has also happened many times before. Examples would be The Bay of Pigs Invasion, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and many others.

You are incorrect about the Kruds. The situation they have created would be like Mexicans coming into the United States and occupying Texas and claiming it is now Little Mexico. They have moved into Turkey, Iraq and Syria, taken large swaths of land, refused to accept the cultures of the host countries and killed thousands. In fact, a large faction of the Kurdish people have been deemed terrorists by most of the Western world. "the PKK has been designated as "terrorist" organization by Turkey,[17] the United States, 28 European countries, and Japan. "

I will tell you just like I told the other:

This is wrong headed, ignorant, and your info lacks historical context.

The entire point of the YPG was to defend their own against the historically documented abuses of the Iraqi and Turkish government. It began in 2004 after youths declared their support for Bush against Saddam Hussein's former Iraq, which gassed them and slaughtered them. It was Turkey that later designated the YPG as a simple "terrorist" organization, because it reacted to Turkey's long history of oppression. AND they knew such rhetoric would resonate with American ears who know next to nothing outside their own borders. And since Turkey is a NATO member, some U.S. officials allowed for the rhetoric. In the meantime, the much wider American official community, too include the Pentagon and the U.S. military, has worked intimately with the Kurds for a very, very long time. They are Turkey's enemies, not ours. And I remind you that we are talking about a Turkey that is increasingly getting in bed with Russia, which according to Trump's own 2017 National Security Strategy, is an enemy.

The Kurds have killed thousands in the same way that we have killed thousands. That is war. And they have earned the right to establish themselves without being slaughtered by their neighbors who wish them to be erased from the landscape.

Your assertion that we betrayed the Kurds is BS. We have no treaty with them. We fought a common enemy together. They used this as an excuse to annex more land. They prodded an enemy they have been fighting for 40 years hoping to avoid retribution by hiding behind American soldiers.

No, we absolutely betrayed the Kurds. They have been the ones who have been slaughtered by Iraqi, Iranian, and Syrian enemies for decades. They are considered "apostates" by Sunni extremists and Islamists. And after proving their loyalty, ever since rising up against Saddam Hussein in 1991 upon Bush's request, they were there for us against IS when the Iraqi and the Turkish government failed to be able to even protect themselves. In the meantime, we drop troops into Saudi Arabia, a country that has admitted to spending hundreds of millions of dollars funding extremist madrassas all around the world that teaches Wahhabism, the ideology of our religious enemies who also hate "apostates" like the Kurds.

You do not know what you are talking about, because you are merely promoting the Trump argument of defense for his senseless unilateral decision that didn't even consider SECDEF/Pentagon guidance.

You can also get off your high horse. You are not the only person who has served in the military.

Oh, it's not my military status and experience that places me there. You see, I read books and can apply that knowledge to the reality without forcing it through a partisan political lens.
 
No they're not. They're the allies of corrupt administrations and boot lickers like yourself.

Bootlickers are infinitely better than the arselickers infesting the current administration, so I guess the bootlickers have that going for them.
 
This might be difficult for someone like you to understand but this is a very simple subject even my retarded ass understands and thanks for starting your post off with **** I already know.

That's an interesting interpretation of the situation.

Syrian Democratic Forces - Wikipedia

Apparently not since you are clinging to simple factoid, while removing context, to create your reality of said "simple subject." And my "interpretation" is simply the well-established truth. Again:

The entire point of the YPG was to defend their own against the historically documented abuses of the Iraqi and Turkish government. It began in 2004 after youths declared their support for Bush against Saddam Hussein's former Iraq, which gassed them and slaughtered them. It was Turkey that later designated the YPG as a simple "terrorist" organization when it sought to defend Kurds against Turkey's historical oppression. AND they knew such rhetoric would resonate with American ears who know next to nothing outside their own borders. And since Turkey is a NATO member, some U.S. officials allowed for the rhetoric. Each one of these governments - Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Turkey - have exploited the Kurds as victims against rival governments and have abused them at the same time within their own borders.

However, there status as a "terrorist" group did not stop the much wider American defense and Intel organizations, to include the Pentagon, from consistently using the Kurds for exactly what they have proven to be - loyal allies. And speaking of loyalty, is Turkey still buying weapons from Russia? Has Turkey gotten with Iran yet over how to manage the area with Russia? So much for being a NATO member.

Your entire argument is based on political partisanship. Before Trump made his bonehead decision, you probably didn't care about the Kurds either way. But now that Trump and FOX News is seeking to spin the situation, you have adopted this "terrorist" angle that has been shoved down your throat. It's transparent.


FYI, your talking to someone that considers Mugabe, Mandela and their commie comrades to be terrorist.

In other words, I'm talking to somebody who is insignificant and has nothing to offer because he prefers a simple world in which he can rage and rage when things prove too hard to comprehend. I'm also obviously talking to a certified member of the alt-right. Mugabe was a brutal strong-man who employed ethnic cleansing as a means to power. Hey, look at that...the Turkish government has historically employed ethnic cleansing tactics against the Kurds too! Funny how selective you are when it comes to defending Trump. And Mandela was a political activist who is widely regarded as an icon of democracy and social justice. But like other "simple subjects" I assume that your grasp of what a "commie" means is also peppered with ignorance.

Thankfully, and despite Trump's temporary determination, the country is led by much, much smarter people who understands that simple factoids must be applied to the context from which they come.
 
He's destroying the Left's agenda, and it's creating an extreme case of butthurt.

Destroying the left’s agenda of fighting ISIS?
 
This might be difficult for someone like you to understand but this is a very simple subject even my retarded ass understands and thanks for starting your post off with **** I already know.



That's an interesting interpretation of the situation.

Syrian Democratic Forces - Wikipedia



FYI, your talking to someone that considers Mugabe, Mandela and their commie comrades to be terrorist.

They are terrorists bcuz leftist bravo.... even if they are fighting ISIS. Muh mercenary assumption is irrelevant to the fact the kurds were fighting the people that throw homosexuals off roofs.
 
Yes the Kurds are fighting jihadist mercenaries that we and our allies have either trained and/or funded.

Mujahideen - Wikipedia



Considering we give funding and weapons to a lot of our ""allies"" that support jihadist mercenaries, that fight for anyone that will pay them, we literally created ISIS.

There's no accountability for the funding, weapons and aid we give to these various groups, that's why Turkey, Syria and Russia are rightfully claiming we fund ISIS, Kurdish terrorist, ect.



You shouldn't be making comments like that after posting a steaming pile of BS.



How about you take your own advice and stop embarrassing the Marine Corps. I guess they really lowered their standards, sad.



Faggot (slang) - Wikipedia



I would claim you're feigning ignorance but I don't think you're pretending.



No they're not. They're the allies of corrupt administrations and boot lickers like yourself.

If ya want to keep the mods away ya might want to consider not calling people bootlickers. I got dinged for it. Also yes they are our allies unless you dont consider the fact we have been working together to defeat ISIS despite the fact we turned our backs on them before. Yeah yeah things are so cartoonishly simple if you leave things out! Congrats you got to stick it to the kurds and now 1300 ISIS terrorists are out there to behead more people you sir sure are smurt.
 
Apparently not since you are clinging to simple factoid, while removing context, to create your reality of said "simple subject." And my "interpretation" is simply the well-established truth. Again:

The entire point of the YPG was to defend their own against the historically documented abuses of the Iraqi and Turkish government. It began in 2004 after youths declared their support for Bush against Saddam Hussein's former Iraq, which gassed them and slaughtered them. It was Turkey that later designated the YPG as a simple "terrorist" organization when it sought to defend Kurds against Turkey's historical oppression. AND they knew such rhetoric would resonate with American ears who know next to nothing outside their own borders. And since Turkey is a NATO member, some U.S. officials allowed for the rhetoric. Each one of these governments - Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Turkey - have exploited the Kurds as victims against rival governments and have abused them at the same time within their own borders.

However, there status as a "terrorist" group did not stop the much wider American defense and Intel organizations, to include the Pentagon, from consistently using the Kurds for exactly what they have proven to be - loyal allies. And speaking of loyalty, is Turkey still buying weapons from Russia? Has Turkey gotten with Iran yet over how to manage the area with Russia? So much for being a NATO member.

Your entire argument is based on political partisanship. Before Trump made his bonehead decision, you probably didn't care about the Kurds either way. But now that Trump and FOX News is seeking to spin the situation, you have adopted this "terrorist" angle that has been shoved down your throat. It's transparent.




In other words, I'm talking to somebody who is insignificant and has nothing to offer because he prefers a simple world in which he can rage and rage when things prove too hard to comprehend. I'm also obviously talking to a certified member of the alt-right. Mugabe was a brutal strong-man who employed ethnic cleansing as a means to power. Hey, look at that...the Turkish government has historically employed ethnic cleansing tactics against the Kurds too! Funny how selective you are when it comes to defending Trump. And Mandela was a political activist who is widely regarded as an icon of democracy and social justice. But like other "simple subjects" I assume that your grasp of what a "commie" means is also peppered with ignorance.

Thankfully, and despite Trump's temporary determination, the country is led by much, much smarter people who understands that simple factoids must be applied to the context from which they come.

Ohhh if citizen is an alt-righter that would also explain the mercenary angle.
 
I voted in the affirmative, but I am not comfortable with the word "becoming". They've never been tolerant to anyone who didn't share their opinions or worldview. It's just now they've decided to be more belligerent in how their intolerance is expressed.
 
Hannity, Limbaugh, and Coulter don't speak for the Trumpcult? You haven't been to America, lately, have you?

I did not talk about Trump cult. I was obviously talking about republicans / conservatives.
 
Those 3 women have always been attacked by conservatives. Why is conservative criticism against them more valid than democratic criticism of them?

They are attacked for being hypocrites...
 
Back
Top Bottom