• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:118]Would it surprise you if Trump was involved Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme?

Would it surprise you if Trump was involved?

  • Total voters
    45
Josie

Josie

*probably reading smut*
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
57,626
Reaction score
32,161
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Let's say that sometime in the future investigators find solid proof that Trump was absolutely involved in Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme. Would it surprise you?
 
I honestly don't think either Trump or Clinton was involved.
 
Surprisingly none of the victims has mentioned Trump or Clinton.

Really don't think Trump would turn down the offer to have a teen. His track record speaks for itself.
 
Crosscheck said:
Surprisingly none of the victims has mentioned Trump or Clinton.

Really don't think Trump would turn down the offer to have a teen. His track record speaks for itself.
Click to expand...

So would it surprise you?
 
Not in the least would it surprise me. In fact, if he did not sexually participate, that would surprise me.
 
Josie said:
Let's say that sometime in the future investigators find solid proof that Trump was absolutely involved in Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme. Would it surprise you?
Click to expand...

Like in the actual trafficking? Or just partaking in underage sex?

I would be a little surprised if Trump had anything to do with the actual trafficking. I think it's far more likely, however, that he full well knew that it was going on and never reported it.
 
The same thing with Clinton. Anyone that is saying they would be surprised is being dishonest.
 
It wouldn't surprise me if more than half of the lefties on this forum are pedophiles.
 
Josie said:
Let's say that sometime in the future investigators find solid proof that Trump was absolutely involved in Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme. Would it surprise you?
Click to expand...

It would be hard for me to see Trump doing that. I mean why did he stop being friends with Epstein?
 
Mongidig said:
It wouldn't surprise me if more than half of the lefties on this forum are pedophiles.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
AProudLefty said:
It would be hard for me to see Trump doing that. I mean why did he stop being friends with Epstein?
Click to expand...

Maybe he never was friends. Maybe their paths crossed a few times and that was it.

If this thread was about Bill Clinton and Epstein, it's a very different dynamic.
 
By 'involved' I'd only imagine Trump was a 'customer' accepting the gift of an underage prostitute from Epstein. I doubt hard evidence will be forthcoming though.
 
AProudLefty said:
It would be hard for me to see Trump doing that. I mean why did he stop being friends with Epstein?
Click to expand...

And therein lies evidence for the other possibility: that even Trump wasn't that much of a creep and distanced himself.

But I find it hard to imagine the powerful did not know what he was up to.
 
uptower said:
And therein lies evidence for the other possibility: that even Trump wasn't that much of a creep and distanced himself.

But I find it hard to imagine the powerful did not know what he was up to.
Click to expand...

Yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if he knew what was up.
 
Mongidig said:
It wouldn't surprise me if more than half of the lefties on this forum are pedophiles.
Click to expand...

Don't know if the that would be true or not. Do know that time and time again we have seen those who accuse others of being pedophiles get arrested for having sex with minors.
 
Given Trumps statement that Epstein likes his women on the younger side, to me indicates he at least knew about what was going on.

Given Trumps record, I would say the potential for engaging in such activities would have occurred at least once.
 
Crosscheck said:
Surprisingly none of the victims has mentioned Trump or Clinton.

Really don't think Trump would turn down the offer to have a teen. His track record speaks for itself.
Click to expand...

Trump has been accused by a "Katie Johnson"

Jane Doe” aka “Katie Johnson” – 1994. Lawsuit filed June 2016, refiled October 2016 as reported by Buzzfeed and others, then dropped in November 2016.
Jane Doe is an unnamed plaintiff, who has also gone by “Katie Johnson” in legal papers. She claims she was repeatedly raped by Trump and Jeffery Epstein at Epstein’s New York City apartment in 1994, when she was 13 years old. A witness, also given a pseudonym — “Tiffany Doe” — said she recruited “Jane Doe” and others. Doe, using the name “Johnson,” gave an interview to the Daily Mail in which she said she did not know who Trump was at the time of the alleged attack but identified him later when she saw him on television. It is not known why she withdrew the lawsuit. She has not spoken publicly or withdrawn her rape allegation since then.
Click to expand...
All the assault allegations against Donald Trump, recapped | PBS NewsHour
 
Josie said:
So would it surprise you?
Click to expand...

Of course it would not be surprise to anyone.

Having three marriages and number of affairs it is pretty certain Trump lets his penis do the thinking for the two of them.
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
Given Trumps statement that Epstein likes his women on the younger side, to me indicates he at least knew about what was going on.

Given Trumps record, I would say the potential for engaging in such activities would have occurred at least once.
Click to expand...

Yes, because to two guys in their 50s can only possibly be talking about teenage girls when referring to younger women.
 
Moon said:
Yes, because to two guys in their 50s can only possibly be talking about teenage girls when referring to younger women.
Click to expand...

I believe younger woman is a given for people at their economic level. So much so it is not mentioned unless it is really young.

There is no way that Epstein's history was not known by a lot of people, not when there is such a large list of potential pedos and rapists having gone to his island.

It is the same in Hollywood, everyone knew what a pig Weinstein was yet it was kept quiet from the public in general.
 
Josie said:
Let's say that sometime in the future investigators find solid proof that Trump was absolutely involved in Epstein's child sex trafficking scheme. Would it surprise you?
Click to expand...

Definition of "absolutely involved"...I doubt either Trump or Clinton TRAFFICKED minors, but it's a fairly safe bet they BOINKED them.
 
ajn678 said:
The same thing with Clinton. Anyone that is saying they would be surprised is being dishonest.
Click to expand...

One can be a sleaze and not be a pedophile. While it appears that Trump and Clinton are likely sex addicts, that does not make them pedophiles. There is no indication that either has such a proclivity. Without an evidence thereof, I think its rather abominable that you would be quick to suggest such. OTH, how can we, as a society, have let our leadership degenerate to the point that this is even a discussion.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom