• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is your opinion of white supremacists, the KKK and neo nazis?

What is your opinion of white supremacists, the KKK and neo nazis?


  • Total voters
    79
They should be condemned totally. Nothing but pond scum.
Thank goodness our president made a public condemnation of them.

No, he did not condemn 'them'. He did not condemn radicalized white hate terrorism. He condemned the act, not the radicalized terrorist that was inspired by his hate-filled rhetoric of Hispanics and blacks.

Screenshot_2019-08-04 Donald J Trump ( realDonaldTrump) Twitter.jpg
 
They got where they are for a reason. For example a kid that sees his mom raped or murdered by a colored man. Maybe he lived in an area where all the colored people were drunks, drug dealers and thugs. It bothers me when virtue signallers want to demand that people either deny their experiences or face retaliation.

So you don't believe he was radicalized by Trump's hate, instead you make up scenarios that maybe his mother had been raped by a 'colored' man. (I wonder if he was orange?) You have sure come up with a host of 'maybes'. How about the most obvious. The guy was on a social media site for fringe elements, people who shared his hatred of Latinos and blacks and all infused with the words of hatred by Donald Trump. When he left that website yesterday, he said he was going to kill some of them. One other responded to him with "I hope you score high".
 
No, he did not condemn 'them'. He did not condemn radicalized white hate terrorism. He condemned the act, not the radicalized terrorist that was inspired by his hate-filled rhetoric of Hispanics and blacks.

View attachment 67261172

Trump said '2nd amendment people' could do something about Hillary Clinton if she were elected, so it's safe to ignore his alligator tears.
 
A few years ago it was possible to see white supremacists in the news, find their address and ask them why. I don't think that it would be possible now with the offense mob at the ready to retaliate. I have talked to a few white supremacists and they are certainly better than the Communists in Cuba.

One thing that might make a difference is for those white supremacists to meet some decent people of color.

Since I've never actually known or met a "white supremacist or member of the KKK or neo nazi"; any opinion I chose would actually be based on other people's opinions that consider themselves to be authorities on the subject.
 
Last edited:
I know it’s bad to make assumptions but I’m going to go ahead and assume that all three would be viewed basically the same as each other. I’m not going to be able to put every single possible answer in the poll so choose the option that comes closest to describing your opinion and if none do, there’ll be an “other” option.

Attaching poll.

Had to vote "OTHER".

That is because no other option matched what I know.

Couldn't say "They're fine people" because President Trump only said that some of them were "very fine people".
 
Before the internet became popular, I asked white supremacists "why". I have a basis to know what drives many racists. Today's virtue signallers are no different than the church ladies from decades past. They weren't interested in making anyone's life better, only wagging their bony finger and telling anyone who would listen how much "better" they were.

So you don't believe he was radicalized by Trump's hate, instead you make up scenarios that maybe his mother had been raped by a 'colored' man. (I wonder if he was orange?) You have sure come up with a host of 'maybes'. How about the most obvious. The guy was on a social media site for fringe elements, people who shared his hatred of Latinos and blacks and all infused with the words of hatred by Donald Trump. When he left that website yesterday, he said he was going to kill some of them. One other responded to him with "I hope you score high".
 
The Hater in Chief speaks to his salivating racist mob.



Many have relinquished their red MAGA hat for t-shirts instead. It sends a much clearer message than simply 'MAGA'. It's just another example of hate mongering, but for journalists.

index.jpg

lynchingtshirt.png
 
I know it’s bad to make assumptions but I’m going to go ahead and assume that all three would be viewed basically the same as each other. I’m not going to be able to put every single possible answer in the poll so choose the option that comes closest to describing your opinion and if none do, there’ll be an “other” option.

Attaching poll.

Doesn't matter what I think of them.
The opinions that matter are the opinions of all the people who they have maimed and killed in the last 300+ years.
But if you were to ask my opinion, they deserve the same fate that they have meted out to their victims.

And yes, Donald Trump IS their enabler-in-chief.
But he is only a symptom. Long after he is gone, even dead and gone, we will still be dealing with this scum.
 
I wonder if the shooter was lacking a father who could teach him how to control his emotions.

So you don't believe he was radicalized by Trump's hate, instead you make up scenarios that maybe his mother had been raped by a 'colored' man. (I wonder if he was orange?) You have sure come up with a host of 'maybes'. How about the most obvious. The guy was on a social media site for fringe elements, people who shared his hatred of Latinos and blacks and all infused with the words of hatred by Donald Trump. When he left that website yesterday, he said he was going to kill some of them. One other responded to him with "I hope you score high".
 
So you don't believe he was radicalized by Trump's hate, instead you make up scenarios that maybe his mother had been raped by a 'colored' man. (I wonder if he was orange?) You have sure come up with a host of 'maybes'. How about the most obvious. The guy was on a social media site for fringe elements, people who shared his hatred of Latinos and blacks and all infused with the words of hatred by Donald Trump. When he left that website yesterday, he said he was going to kill some of them. One other responded to him with "I hope you score high".

When you get some evidence that he was radicalized by anything Trump has said, please post it. Until then, stop spreading lies.
 
Since I've never actually known or met a "white supremacist or member of the KKK or neo nazi"; any opinion I chose would actually be based on other people's opinions that consider themselves to be authorities on the subject.

Yeah....I think we all know what this means.
 
They're pure trash but so are organizations like Antifa, Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, and the list goes on.

Funny how some people only think of the KKK and neo-nazis as racist and extremist but don't give a thought to these militant groups in the black community.


Funny how some people can't help but deflect and derail whenever white folks are criticized. It's about white supremacists in this thread, no one cares about those other things, start a "damn black people" thread if this one vexes you.
 
I wonder if the shooter was lacking a father who could teach him how to control his emotions.

According to studies done by neuroscientists, the rational part of the male brain is not fully developed until at least the age of 25. This white radical terrorist had just turned 21. The majority of these white terrorists have been under the age of 25. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part. This is the part of the brain that responds to situations with good judgment and an awareness of long-term consequences. Teens process information with the amygdala. This is the emotional part. That’s why when teens have overwhelming emotional input, they can’t explain later what they were thinking. They weren’t thinking as much as they were feeling.
 
Actually it looks more like he's trying to explain how she might have actually ending up where she was. I couldn't find anything remotely close to Phattonz saying that Fields shouldn't be punished, simply because of what Heyer might've been doing.

:lamo You guys do stick together and have each others backs, I'll give you that...……...
 
That should make it obvious how much damage virtue signallers can do. Retaliation for expressing "wrong" opinions could drive someone to snap in this manner.

According to studies done by neuroscientists, the rational part of the male brain is not fully developed until at least the age of 25. This white radical terrorist had just turned 21. The majority of these white terrorists have been under the age of 25. Adults think with the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s rational part. This is the part of the brain that responds to situations with good judgment and an awareness of long-term consequences. Teens process information with the amygdala. This is the emotional part. That’s why when teens have overwhelming emotional input, they can’t explain later what they were thinking. They weren’t thinking as much as they were feeling.
 
they are domestic terrorist. that trump supports they have killed more American citizens over the years than any other so called terrorist in this country.
 
they are domestic terrorist. that trump supports they have killed more American citizens over the years than any other so called terrorist in this country.
Trump doesnt support these people. Why do you have to lie like that?
 
That should make it obvious how much damage virtue signallers can do. Retaliation for expressing "wrong" opinions could drive someone to snap in this manner.

This guy seems to be far more triggered by the behavior of the open border left on immigration than by anything Trump has said. BUt it never occurs to liberals that their ideas can radicalize people.
 
No surprises in the poll results so far. I find these groups abhorrent to the max; as I do any other group that summarily classifies groups of people as subhuman, unworthy, disgusting or not entitled to all the rights and freedoms our country offers. Emphasis on any other group
 
Actually it looks more like he's trying to explain how she might have actually ending up where she was. I couldn't find anything remotely close to Phattonz saying that Fields shouldn't be punished, simply because of what Heyer might've been doing.

Post #18 by Hawkeye

"Rule #1 in Victim Culture is that victims are always innocent.

Rule #2 is that rule #1 will not be questioned."

That's a pretty ****ing blatant admission that the idea is to try and smear the woman murdered by a far right terrorist.....but you know that, seeing as you "liked" the post.
 
What if it wasn't the ideas themselves, but the ugly treatment he got from "virtue signallers"?


This guy seems to be far more triggered by the behavior of the open border left on immigration than by anything Trump has said. BUt it never occurs to liberals that their ideas can radicalize people.
 
**** nazis, the klan, and white supremacy. IMO, a potential solution is to increase access to post secondary education. though it doesn't work in every case, education and career development seem to act as an antidote to racism and a lot of other general stupidity.

ON CNN, some expert was recommending public shaming. Focused, organized shaming.

I posted that in one of the shooting threads and didnt get back to see what comments I got on it yet but I had misgivings about it.
 
They got where they are for a reason. For example a kid that sees his mom raped or murdered by a colored man. Maybe he lived in an area where all the colored people were drunks, drug dealers and thugs. It bothers me when virtue signallers want to demand that people either deny their experiences or face retaliation.

These POS losers (doing the shootings) have no such justification. Not one that I remember.

Look at you, making excuses for them.
 
ON CNN, some expert was recommending public shaming. Focused, organized shaming.

I posted that in one of the shooting threads and didnt get back to see what comments I got on it yet but I had misgivings about it.

nazi scumbags should only feel comfortable under the refrigerator in the dark like cockroaches. However, I still think that education is the best path to fewer nazis.
 
I wonder if the shooter was lacking a father who could teach him how to control his emotions.

The El Paso one was not lacking a father.

Btw, all those babies that you'd see born by forbidding abortion? Few of them would have fathers in their lives either.
 
Back
Top Bottom