This is actually pretty accurate standing After that night, Gabbard should be elevated significantly. Now, I'm going to look at this as if I were Democrat voter (which I'm not), so bear with me.
If I were looking for someone to represent my viewpoints, lesser border security, healthcare coverage, and a bunch of other stuff Leftists like, but I don't want someone who's over the top about that, Tulsi Gabbard would be my top choice. She's calm, calculated, and has a (much more) honorable record than the other people running. Mistress Harris would be the worst of the bunch, She parades herself around as if she's a goddess, but she's arrogant, condescending, and just not a nice person. On top of all that, she's a purist. In other words, she's WAY over the top on her positions and typically not faithful at all with the goal she's trying to accomplish. She thinks she's "holier than thou". Gabbard doesn't come across like that. She holds true to her beliefs and policies, but isn't as ridiculous about it. I would vote for her over these other candidates, again, if I were a Democrat voter because she seems more moderate, if that's what defines the Democrat party (a party of moderates), than a foam at the mouth Leftist. Creepy Joe, even though he's seen as a moderate, he's low energy and can't get the base relied up like Gabbard because she's much younger and can connect with young people. Yang lacks the spine to do anything, despite what young Leftists say about him. Gabbard, once again, is strong in character and won't bend over backwards.
Now the reality. The majority of Democrat voters, as it stands today (and how it stands on your chart, which is very accurate), are going with Creepy Joe because most of the Democrat voting base not only see him as a moderate (which he isn't), but also a 3rd term of Obama. He WAS the Obama's VP so it makes sense. However, the fact that the candidates attacked Obama relentlessly says something. As big of a Leftist as Obama is, apparently he didn't go far enough in many areas. One could argue that Obama, despite the star power the media gave him, wasn't as popular with the Left as he was made out to be. If that's true, the only reason why the Left didn't come down on him like a plague is because he's black and didn't want the word racist attached to their name by the media. Now that he's been gone for almost 4 years, the gloves are off and they are now saying what they truly thought of him. These candidates thought Obama himself was too moderate during his administration. If this statement is true then we can confirm what we already knew: the Democrat party is NOT the party of moderates, but group of mentally insane whack jobs. The last 2 debates have demonstrated this perfectly.
