- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 1,491
- Reaction score
- 236
- Location
- group w bench
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Background:
Meghan Murphy was banned from twitter after misgendering transgender activist Jessica Yaniv. She then filed a lawsuit against twitter for deceptive trade practices and breach of contract.
Feminist Banned By Twitter Fires Back With Lawsuit | The Daily Caller
The court sides with Twitter in the law suit. Meghan says she will file an appeal.
This journalist lost her lawsuit against Twitter for banning her account, but she’s not giving up
Statement from one of Meghan's lawyers Adam Candeub.
Twitter Gets Another Significant Section 230 Win in Lawsuit by Suspended User-Murphy v. Twitter - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
Twitter claims the tweet Meghan made broke there Hateful Conduct Policy. I'm not going to post an archive of the tweet but I will post a screenshot of the public court documents that describe the tweet.
That doesn't sound like hateful conduct to me, it sounds like she was trying to warn the public.
What say you fine citizens?
Meghan Murphy was banned from twitter after misgendering transgender activist Jessica Yaniv. She then filed a lawsuit against twitter for deceptive trade practices and breach of contract.
Feminist Banned By Twitter Fires Back With Lawsuit | The Daily Caller
:lamo:lamoThe final straw for Twitter was a tweet in which Murphy referred to a transgender activist, Jessica Yaniv, as “him.” Murphy’s tweet included a screenshot of a review that Yaniv posted for a waxing salon, under the previous name, “Jonathan Yaniv,” which is still listed on Yaniv’s Twitter profile.
“In the past year, Yaniv has filed 16 different human rights complaints against female estheticians from across Canada for refusing to perform Brazilian waxes on Yaniv due to Yaniv having male genitalia,” Murphy’s lawyers wrote in court documents reviewed by TheDCNF.
In an email to TheDCNF, Yaniv called it “totally untrue that ALL of the complaints are involving Brazilian waxing and that they are women’“working from their homes’ because as such, many of these are retail salons. Also, she, nor the lawyer knows about my genitalia, nor is it applicable because as you know, I am legally a female.”
The court sides with Twitter in the law suit. Meghan says she will file an appeal.
This journalist lost her lawsuit against Twitter for banning her account, but she’s not giving up
Statement from one of Meghan's lawyers Adam Candeub.
Twitter Gets Another Significant Section 230 Win in Lawsuit by Suspended User-Murphy v. Twitter - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Today, the Superior Court of San Francisco dismissed a user’s lawsuit against Twitter, effectively ruling that the social media giant may break its promises to users or advertisers with impunity. The court’s overbroad interpretation of Communications Decency Act Section 230 gives internet platforms sweeping immunity from suit, even for violating their own contracts and flouting their own promises to users and advertisers. We intend to appeal this ruling, and will continue to seek to protect the rights of consumers in the social media world….
In rejecting Twitter’s anti-SLAPP action pursuant to its public interest exception, the Court joins a growing chorus recognizing the centrality of social media to public discourse—and the importance to the public of adjudicating legal claims against the major social media platforms.
Twitter claims the tweet Meghan made broke there Hateful Conduct Policy. I'm not going to post an archive of the tweet but I will post a screenshot of the public court documents that describe the tweet.
It(twitter) then banned her permanently after she asserted that transgender women in Canada formerly named Jonathan Yaniv is"the man responsible for trying to extort money from estheticians who refuse to give him a brazilian bikini wax," asked why the media and courts are "protecting this guy's identity."
That doesn't sound like hateful conduct to me, it sounds like she was trying to warn the public.
What say you fine citizens?