• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Poll: Epstein case accmplices

Did Clinton or Trump molest girls that Epstein provided?


  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
Actually good point. I thought that nickname was just one the right-wing media used to tar Clinton with, but if it was known at the time that's what he called his aircraft, anyone (not least a public figure) should think long and hard before climbing the gangway.

Article 14 of the indictment mentions the jet but no nickname. Does anyone know where it originated?

The informal nickname "Lolita Express" is apparently one originating from what many of the locals in the Virgin Islands dubbed Epstein's private jet for having seen so many young girls departing on the plane for Little Saint James. So, to be fair to those who may have ridden in the airplane with Epstein, they may not have heard the reference.
 
The informal nickname "Lolita Express" is apparently one originating from what many of the locals in the Virgin Islands dubbed Epstein's private jet for having seen so many young girls departing on the plane for Little Saint James. So, to be fair to those who may have ridden in the airplane with Epstein, they may not have heard the reference.

Thanks for clearing that up. I still suspect that it was known in the halls of power and they tolerated it.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

I don’t know what he told Bradley. I know what he told WaPo though.

When did Alan Garten lie to WaPo ??
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

When did Alan Garten lie to WaPo ??

The article I linked to is in post 63.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

The article I linked to is in post 63.

It's highly disingenuous to post a link behind a pay wall.

That being said I can see the date, which was July 8 2019. Bradley Edwards, in court documents dated April 2011, stated Trump was banned, so I ask again, did Alan Garten lie to Bradley Edwards or tell Edwards to lie in April 2011 ??
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

It's highly disingenuous to post a link behind a pay wall.

That being said I can see the date, which was July 8 2019. Bradley Edwards, in court documents dated April 2011, stated Trump was banned, so I ask again, did Alan Garten lie to Bradley Edwards or tell Edwards to lie in April 2011 ??

There’s nothing in the article to suggest that Garten ever spoke to Edwards.

Clear your cookies if you want to read the article.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

There’s nothing in the article to suggest that Garten ever spoke to Edwards.

Clear your cookies if you want to read the article.

Then there's no way you can claim Garten is lying about Epstein being banned when Edwards claimed such in court documents dated April 2011.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

Then there's no way you can claim Garten is lying about Epstein being banned when Edwards claimed such in court documents dated April 2011.

So you no longer believe Garten is lying?
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

So you no longer believe Garten is lying?

Seeing as how Edwards made the claim in April 2011 your insistence that Garten is lying while ignoring court records nothing more than partsian hackery.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

Seeing as how Edwards made the claim in April 2011 your insistence that Garten is lying while ignoring court records nothing more than partsian hackery.

What is the source of Edwards' claim?
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

What is the source of Edwards' claim?

Other than what's stated in court documents, I don't know.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

Other than what's stated in court documents, I don't know.

If you had cleared your cookies and read the WaPo article, you'd have a pretty good idea.
 
Re: Poll: Epstein case accmplic[QUOTE="Amelia, post: 1070313968, member: 24499"]You have a link for that?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Ames

If you had cleared your cookies and read the WaPo article, you'd have a pretty good idea.

Technically you're asking me steel something to substantiate your claims when all you have to do is post it.
 
I’m concerned by all of it, as should anyone who isn’t a partisan hack. I’ve said before on this board that this isn’t a political issue to me and anyone found guilty of committing these crimes should go away forever. I don’t care what party they belong to.

So where do you stand? Investigate and prosecute ALL the offenders, or partisan hack?

From another, earlier thread:

This is such a perfect case of how deluded the left and right both are. If you go to a liberal website, you see headlines about Trump's old buddy being a kiddie diddler, and if you go to a right wing website, you get the same about the Clintons. It's incredible that so few people come to the self-evident conclusion that both sides are rotten to the core, and that the corporate wings of both parties need to be drug behind a metaphorical, nonliteral shed and be metaphorically, nonliterally shot in their metaphorical, nonliteral heads.
 
Back
Top Bottom