- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Messages
- 10,821
- Reaction score
- 3,348
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I can't include nearly as many options as there are candidates, so I'll list the most prominent ones and a final "other: ___________" option.
I can't include nearly as many options as there are candidates, so I'll list the most prominent ones and a final "other: ___________" option.
Sanders, Warren, Gabbard.
How interesting to see a picture of Trump there. Has he gone back to being a Democrat again?
All of the candidates are there -- Democrat and Republican. Notice the color of the borders of their pictures.
That kind of surprises me. Who are you hoping wins the nomination?
Well this is a reason to not post before coffee, :lol: Read the first half of the sentence and poll, and thought it said who you would want to WIN the nomination.
So yeah, ignore my poll results and that post.
My top three to win the nomination are Sanders, Warren, and Gabbard.
If I had to pick three to drop out, it would be Biden, Booker, and Harris.
BRB, heading to Starbucks. :lol:
Oh, thanks. I missed that border color. So, two Republican candidates?
Sanders is the only one. Leave the democratic primary to the democrats.
Sanders has been the intellectual leader of the democratic party for the past few years. At the debate last night, even if he wasn't up there, his ideas were. He's helped shift the party dramatically to the left.
This loyalty to party is absurd. Progressive ideals should be the litmus test for the nominee, period.
Sanders has been the intellectual leader of the democratic party for the past few years. At the debate last night, even if he wasn't up there, his ideas were. He's helped shift the party dramatically to the left.
This loyalty to party is absurd. Progressive ideals should be the litmus test for the nominee, period.
His ideas are democratic ideas, turned up to 12. Nothing new, just lots more.
I can't include nearly as many options as there are candidates, so I'll list the most prominent ones and a final "other: ___________" option.
I would just as soon they all run. Unless they are all heard to some degree, there is no way to separate the fruit loops and dangerous from those who might do a decent job of leadership of the country.
What if there were 150 of them running? The more crowded the field, the more of them feel they have to act like clowns to try to dominate the spotlight. How people would actually lead is not necessarily indicated by the publicity stunts they feel they need to engage in to dominate the headlines and get ahead.
To me, it would depend on how candidates are forced out.I wouldn't have anyone drop-out. There's always room for more & better ideas. Let them all battle it out. The cream will rise to the top, and the People will decide through the proper channels - that being their voting.
I can't include nearly as many options as there are candidates, so I'll list the most prominent ones and a final "other: ___________" option.