• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Celebrity Cher Comes out in Against Illegal Immigration - Agree or Disagree with her Statement?

Do you agree with Cher's Tweet about Illegal Immigration?

  • Total voters
    21
truthatallcost said:
Good for Cher. So many celebrities live in a privilege bubble, and seem to value virtue signaling support for illegals over concern for the deteriorating state of many American's lives in a Sanctuary State.

Trump sides with Cher after star questions LA'''s ability to ‘take care of its own’ amid immigration debate | Fox News
Click to expand...

So, Trump is agree with Cher that LA is a cluster ****? I wonder how many of those people she says the city isn't taking care of are illegals.
 
Nap said:
I agree things are complicated and every policy is going to have pros and cons. The point is if you are going to simplify it into a statement that they are a net gain, Democrats are more than welcome to prove that premise.
Click to expand...

They're a net gain. Maybe that's bad news for some, or they don't wanna believe it, but too bad.

And it's not reasonable to declare "if true then I should get what I want".
 
uptower said:
You mean more hot Latin chicks? That 'fate' doesn't scare me at all.
Click to expand...

The "hot chicks" stay back in their home country. That's why they are so available in places like Cuba. What few hot chicks are illegally trafficked into the USA will be pressured to work in strip clubs.
 
ecofarm said:
They're a net gain. Maybe that's bad news for some, or they don't wanna believe it, but too bad.

And it's not reasonable to declare "if true then I should get what I want".
Click to expand...

If something is a net gain, then shouldn't more of it be a good thing?
 
Nap said:
If something is a net gain, then shouldn't more of it be a good thing?
Click to expand...

Sure. And there are a million other factors explaining why you don't get your way, instead of inventing a new reality with alternate facts.
 
ecofarm said:
Sure. And there are a million other factors explaining why you don't get your way, instead of inventing a new reality with alternate facts.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about "with getting my way" and what alternative facts have I put out?

The reality is that some don't seem to believe they are a net gain for their area otherwise they wouldn't be opposed to the idea of having them in their city.
 
Nap said:
What are you talking about "with getting my way" and what alternative facts have I put out?

The reality is that some don't seem to believe they are a net gain for their area otherwise they wouldn't be opposed to the idea of having them in their city.
Click to expand...

This is asinine. You can't claim an established fact is fake because you don't get your way (settlement in sanctuary cities).

I could claim all facts are fake anytime I don't get my way? Intolerably childish BS.


What else is "proved" by you not getting your way? All immigrants are criminals? Why not? That satisfies your "logic".
 
ecofarm said:
This is asinine. You can't claim an established fact is fake because you don't get your way (settlement in sanctuary cities).

I could claim all facts are fake anytime I don't get my way? Intolerably childish BS.
Click to expand...

If it is an established fact, do you have any evidence that illegal immigrants are a net gain?

My way would be abolishing the social safety net and having open borders.

Shouldn't settlement in sanctuary cities be the Democrats way? If you believe they are a net gain and that Trump supporters and Republicans are horrible racist bigots, wouldn't you be a horrible person to not be advocating for them to be settled there in order to escape bigotry?
 
Nap said:
If it is an established fact, do you have any evidence that illegal immigrants are a net gain?

My way would be abolishing the social safety net and having open borders.

Shouldn't settlement in sanctuary cities be the Democrats way? If you believe they are a net gain and that Trump supporters and Republicans are horrible racist bigots, wouldn't you be a horrible person to not be advocating for them to be settled there in order to escape bigotry?
Click to expand...

Spare me the partisan horse crap. You want to deny established fact on the basis that Dems aren't doing what you want. It's horrendously stupid and I'm done.
 
ecofarm said:
This is asinine. You can't claim an established fact is fake because you don't get your way (settlement in sanctuary cities).

I could claim all facts are fake anytime I don't get my way? Intolerably childish BS.


What else is "proved" by you not getting your way? All immigrants are criminals? Why not? That satisfies your "logic".
Click to expand...

I'm curious when was the last time there was a thread you were able to have a discussion with someone that disagrees with you that you haven't implied that they were a bigot in some way.
 
Nap said:
I'm curious when was the last time there was a thread you were able to have a discussion with someone that disagrees with you that you haven't implied that they were a bigot in some way.
Click to expand...

You're not disagreeing with anyone. You're spewing stupid BS. You can claim every fact about immigrants is false because Dems aren't going along with the sanctuary city plan. That's brilliant. Great work.
 
ecofarm said:
Spare me the partisan horse crap. You want to deny established fact on the basis that Dems aren't doing what you want. It's horrendously stupid and I'm done.
Click to expand...

This has absolutely nothing to do with what I want or what I believe.

You say it is an established fact that illegal immigrants are a net gain, some Democrats say they don't want them in their city and are upset Trump would propose the idea. Why is that? If they are a net gain, then why are there so many upset with the idea? Simple question.
 
I approve the president's plan. Send illegals where they're wanted; sanctuary cities and states.
 
uptower said:
Most of the people in sanctuary cities are DACAs, overstayers and their descendants and so on. They didn't just climb over the fence. Others turn up at legal ports of entry to claim asylum. No fnce climbing there either. The OP mentioned that because the Latino population is booming in some cities that they'll be moving to others. They're not all immigrants - many are now native born. And from them, there is a pool of good-looking people. Much more attractive that the bearded, beergutted biker-types who hate them.
Click to expand...

I was watching Tucker and it doesn't look good whats climbing over the fence.
 
truthatallcost said:
Good for Cher. So many celebrities live in a privilege bubble, and seem to value virtue signaling support for illegals over concern for the deteriorating state of many American's lives in a Sanctuary State.

Trump sides with Cher after star questions LA'''s ability to ‘take care of its own’ amid immigration debate | Fox News
Click to expand...
I agree with her statement that states and cities should take of their own first. But I don't think she was actually blasting illegal immigration and sanctuary cities. I think it was a partisan jab at Trump for wanting to send illegal immigrants to sanctuary states and cities. Cher's anti-Trump tweets.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom