• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you believe Mueller's findings about the Trump admin/Russia?

Do you believe Mueller's findings about the Trump admin/Russia?


  • Total voters
    80
Didnt the Nunes led House investigation already clear Trump :lol:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do by Trump.

By the time it is all sorted out, it is this we will remember. And Barr damn knows it.

Has not been a good weekend politically for you, huh?
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do by Trump.

By the time it is all sorted out, it is this we will remember. And Barr damn knows it.

Barr is doing his job period. He was appointed by Trump, however confirmed by congress. The only impact he had on the Mueller investigation was pushing it along, rather then just letting it go on endlessly as Rosenstein was prepared to do.
 
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.

Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?

I would believe Mueller's findings, but I do not believe Barr's conclusions. Obviously, we have yet to see the findings.
 
I would believe Mueller's findings, but I do not believe Barr's conclusions. Obviously, we have yet to see the findings.

Except the main headline everyone is reporting on today is an exact quote from Mueller's report. There's no evidence that Trump or anyone in the Trump administration interfered in the election with the Russians.
 
Obstruction of what? The report makes it clear that you would need an underlying crime to form the intent to obstruct an investigation into it.

You don't need an underlying crime to obstruct justice. Stop believing Rudy G.
 
You don't need an underlying crime to obstruct justice. Stop believing Rudy G.
So clearly you did not read the report, or if you did, did not understand what was said.

Again.

The report makes it clear that you would need an underlying crime to form the intent to obstruct an investigation into it.

Do you also not understand that the above speaks to the requisite intent that was pointed to in the report?

There was no evidence of an underlying crime. What your reply is suggesting is that he was trying to obstruct for the sole reason to simply obstruct? That is nonsense.
 
You don't need an underlying crime to obstruct justice. Stop believing Rudy G.

You need to read the summary. Mueller did not make any conclusions on obstruction and left that to the Justice Dept. Barr and Rosentstein have already concluded that there is not suffecient evidence to pursue obstruction. It's over. Okay?
 
Which in and of itself should tell something.

Every American should read that complete report and examine the evidence that went into it.

Otherwise, we are relying on a partisan interpretation of selective conclusions.

This will be the new Democratic Party claim because they know it would be criminally illegal to release it all. In fact, if Barr is lying people on the Mueller team would say so - so you claim is nonsense.

Anyway, keep attacking Mueller. I'm confident that'll work out for you. :roll:
 
Barr is doing his job period. He was appointed by Trump, however confirmed by congress. The only impact he had on the Mueller investigation was pushing it along, rather then just letting it go on endlessly as Rosenstein was prepared to do.

Which has nothing to do with accurate portrayal of the Mueller Report. Only a reading of it will tell us.
 
This will be the new Democratic Party claim because they know it would be criminally illegal to release it all. In fact, if Barr is lying people on the Mueller team would say so - so you claim is nonsense.

Anyway, keep attacking Mueller. I'm confident that'll work out for you. :roll:

I did not attack Mueller.
 
In that case, the poll is meaningless, as is the release we have received from Barr.

Only to those who are upset because they didn't get the conclusion they wanted. What conspiracy theory is in play here? Is Mueller in on it too?
 
See the letter he sent previously to his nomination for proof. It is right there.

How about you post a link to it as you always demand such from me.
 
In that case, the poll is meaningless, as is the release we have received from Barr.

trumpcons and liberty-rights are doing what they always do. Invent the false-narrative of how lefties feel, doggedly assign it to them, and then accuse the left of melting down.

Some to the right of center said they wanted to see the report, as did the vast majority of those to the left of center. However, most of the righties just smeared an appointed federal employee, from #45 up to fake fox news.
 
Back
Top Bottom