• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you believe Mueller's findings about the Trump admin/Russia?

Do you believe Mueller's findings about the Trump admin/Russia?


  • Total voters
    80

Josie

*probably reading smut*
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
57,293
Reaction score
31,693
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.

Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?
 
Until we can read the complete Mueller Report one cannot answer this question.
 
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.

Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?

Let's put it this way...I believe Barr.
 
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.

Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?
I'm not surprised, most of these people are not smart enough to conspire and not get caught.

OTOH, the campaign clearly got played by the Russians and had lots of inappropriate contact with them.

Lets see the full report.
 
You won't be reading the full report.

Which in and of itself should tell something.

Every American should read that complete report and examine the evidence that went into it.

Otherwise, we are relying on a partisan interpretation of selective conclusions.
 
i haven't seen the full report.
 
Which in and of itself should tell something.

Every American should read that complete report and examine the evidence that went into it.

Otherwise, we are relying on a partisan interpretation of selective conclusions.

Mueller is a partisan? Barr is a partisan?
 
We damn well should.

Maybe, maybe not. I'm not privy to the legal aspects of that.

I do have to wonder, though, if there would still be calls for seeing the full report from the left if Barr had announced today that there WAS evidence of the Trump admin working with Russia. I'm sure the usual Trump-humpers would be demanding it, but I bet the other side would find Barr's report sufficient. Funny how politics work, huh?
 
Mueller is a partisan? Barr is a partisan?

Barr is indeed a partisan and his own personal record demonstrates this without a doubt.
 
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not privy to the legal aspects of that.

I do have to wonder, though, if there would still be calls for seeing the full report from the left if Barr had announced today that there WAS evidence of the Trump admin working with Russia. I'm sure the usual Trump-humpers would be demanding it, but I bet the other side would find Barr's report sufficient. Funny how politics work, huh?

Yep. It’s like a team sport.
 
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not privy to the legal aspects of that.

I do have to wonder, though, if there would still be calls for seeing the full report from the left if Barr had announced today that there WAS evidence of the Trump admin working with Russia. I'm sure the usual Trump-humpers would be demanding it, but I bet the other side would find Barr's report sufficient. Funny how politics work, huh?

Barr made iran contra go away: All reasonable people want the full report and transparency.
 
Can't say, have not seen Mueller's findings. All we have is Barr's summation of Mueller's findings. Could be an accurate portrayal or just Barr's personal spin. We'll likely know more in the coming months.
 
Can't say, have not seen Mueller's findings. All we have is Barr's summation of Mueller's findings. Could be an accurate portrayal or just Barr's personal spin. We'll likely know more in the coming months.

There is plenty of time now before the election to stall. That is probably the plan from the WH
 
Barr is indeed a partisan and his own personal record demonstrates this without a doubt.

Barr did a headlong rush to write the narrative letter he wanted us to have as our first impression (48 hours).

House Judiciary Chairman Nadler said he will have Barr before his committee to discuss the whole of it, to include the 48 hours from Barr receiving the report of the 22 months of investigation to Barr's mad dash letter to control the narrative.

The thread poll is impossible to pick and choose from because we have not read the Mueller report. The poll question asks us whether we believe the report. We haven't seen the report. All we have is the claims of the AG Wm Barr who can be regarded as Trump's Roy Cohn. We already have Rudy the Clown as Trump's roving mouthpiece lawyer. Indeed Barr is trying to give Trump free reign to run off the reservation with a clean slate.
 
This was the Barr report; not the Mueller report.

I don't know yet whether or not we should have a problem with Barr's summary, but we do need to be clear on that distinction.
 
Barr did a headlong rush to write the narrative letter he wanted us to have as our first impression (48 hours).

House Judiciary Chairman Nadler said he will have Barr before his committee to discuss the whole of it, to include the 48 hours from Barr receiving the report of the 22 months of investigation to Barr's mad dash letter to control the narrative.

The thread poll is impossible to pick and choose from because we have not read the Mueller report. The poll question asks us whether we believe the report. We haven't seen the report. All we have is the claims of the AG Wm Barr who can be regarded as Trump's Roy Cohn. We already have Rudy the Clown as Trump's roving mouthpiece lawyer. Indeed Barr is trying to give Trump free reign to run off the reservation with a clean slate.

Barr is doing the job he was hired to do by Trump.

By the time it is all sorted out, it is this we will remember. And Barr damn knows it.
 
Can't say, have not seen Mueller's findings. All we have is Barr's summation of Mueller's findings. Could be an accurate portrayal or just Barr's personal spin. We'll likely know more in the coming months.

Let me ask you, if Barr put is personal spin on the report, would not Mueller know? And what kind spin, Barr said there was no collusion by Trump or anyone. So for Barr to stop his spin you would expect that Barr would say Trump colluded with the Russian plus every person on his campaign.
 
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction of Justice - The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The investigation led by Robert S. Mueller III found that neither President Trump nor any of his aides conspired or coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference, according to a summary of the special counsel’s findings made public on Sunday by Attorney General William P. Barr.

Are you surprised that no evidence was found that the Trump administration conspired with the Russians to interfere with the 2016 election? Do you believe it?

I still do not understand all the lying about association with Russians. But, I do believe Meuller did a good job.
 
Is this the poll where all the people demonizing Mueller for the past two years, now 100% support his findings, and all the people that 100% supported it prior to today, quesiton it?
 
Until we can read the complete Mueller Report one cannot answer this question.

Oh good grief. You guys knew there was nothing and now the investigation reveals nothing and you just can't stand it. You couldn't stand the election outcome and the BS just continues from democrats. Mueller said no collusion, and nothing on obstruction to act upon. Barr and Rosenstien say no obstruction based on the evidence provided by Mueller.
 
Back
Top Bottom