• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Redeeming Trump Qualities.

So far he doesn't appear to be a war monger, rhetoric aside. I mean, he still has us fighting the wars his predecessors got us into but at least he hasn't gotten us into new ones. I know it is a low bar, but it is an important one.

And...I guess that is it. I had a few more back when he first was elected, but he has since proven me wrong on those.

He might be looking better on that front by removing the need to request permission to drone civilians or report the deed after the fact. Out of sight, out of mind. War is sooo clean, even an evangelical could do it.
 
Why is this on the poll board? :roll:
 
Redeeming Trump Qualities.

I have yet to identify any. Not even one.
 
You might as well talk about the Whigs, as you are skipping over what happened in 1964 and the years following. Southern whites became republicans, southern blacks became democrats, both in response to civil rights legislation which Goldwater, the GOP candidate, opposed. LBJ predicted it. Nixon referred to it as a "southern strategy." My childhood hero, Jackie Robinson, switched parties that year. The (white) "Solid South" remained solid, just switched parties. And since then, from Nixon's "law and order," to Reagan's welfare queens and "strapping young bucks" to Bush's Willie Horton to Donald Trump's lies about black on white homicide, politicians have exploited racial fear. Democrats such as the Clintons haven't been immune to the temptation either.
[h=1]

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’
[/h]
"According to this narrative, advanced by progressive historians, Nixon orchestrated a party switch on civil rights by converting the racists in the Democratic Party — the infamous Dixiecrats — into Republicans. And now, according to a recent article in The New Republic, President Trump is the “true heir, the beneficiary of the policies the party has pursued for more than half a century.”Yes, this story is in the textbooks and on the history channel and regularly repeated in the media, but is it true? First, no one has ever given a single example of an explicitly racist pitch by Nixon during his long career. One might expect that a racist appeal to the Deep South actually would have to be made, and to be understood as such. Yet, quite evidently none was."
"

Nixon barely campaigned in the Deep South. His strategy, as outlined by Kevin Phillips in his classic work, “The Emerging Republican Majority,” was to target the Sunbelt, the vast swath of territory stretching from Florida to Nixon’s native California. This included what Phillips terms the Outer or Peripheral South.
Nixon recognized the South was changing. It was becoming more industrialized, with many northerners moving to the Sunbelt. Nixon’s focus, Phillips writes, was on the non-racist, upwardly-mobile, largely urban voters of the Outer or Peripheral South. Nixon won these voters, and he lost the Deep South, which went to Democratic segregationist George Wallace.
And how many racist Dixiecrats did Nixon win for the GOP? Turns out, virtually none. Among the racist Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina was the sole senator to defect to the Republicans — and he did this long before Nixon’s time. Only one Dixiecrat congressman, Albert Watson of South Carolina, switched to the GOP. The rest, more than 200 Dixiecrat senators, congressmen, governors and high elected officials, all stayed in the Democratic Party."
 
I'm saying there are good and bad points to everyone. I defended Obama from the right's utter nonsense and I defend Trump from the left's utter nonsense. I didn't vote for Trump in the primaries or the general so he wasn't who I wanted president. The left would have you believe that Trump is 100% all bad.

He is not an honorable person in any way. He’s been a liar and cheat his whole life if you have followed his life.
 
He is not an honorable person in any way. He’s been a liar and cheat his whole life if you have followed his life.

Everyone has good some good qualities. To deny this only shows your complete and total partisanship.
 
Fact check: false. History began on January 20, 2017. Before that time, there was no economy, no fire, no firmaments and we pooped in our dinner plates. There was, however, one thing that did happen before that date: Hillary Clinton gave all our nuclear weapons to Russia in the Plutonium One scandal.

Reported for being too truthful
 
So tell me, what are his good qualities?

He gets things done. Most of his policies have been good. He has been a good father and husband in the eyes of his wife and children. What you think doesn't matter.
 
He gets things done. Most of his policies have been good. He has been a good father and husband in the eyes of his wife and children. What you think doesn't matter.

You are confusing policies with qualities. Never in my lifetime has a president been elected who was dishonorable and has done and said what Trump has. So I guess that does not matter to you but it does to me and the majority of the people.
 
The best thing that I can think of about Trump is that the collar on his white shirts are never yellowed or stained from sweat. Oh, and his fingernails are always well manicured.
 
How very "Unifying" of you. Basically, you have a bunch of ****ty states that nobody wants to live in, and you're using bad election laws to force every other state to be more like you, and the best argument for why it's morally acceptable for you to do that is to tell them all to "piss off."
:lamo

The people that can afford to leave those blue state ****holes are abandoning them as fast as possible. The ones that stay there vote for rats because they love the promise of free **** and mommy government taking care of them. They are everything this country was formed NOT to be. Literally...the San Andreas could knock California into the ocean and let it exist as its own little island and the world would be a better place. And that comes from someone that was born there.
 
He gives sex offenders hope of redemption and possibly careers in politics, for that we can all be eternally grateful.
 
:lamo

The people that can afford to leave those blue state ****holes are abandoning them as fast as possible. The ones that stay there vote for rats because they love the promise of free **** and mommy government taking care of them. They are everything this country was formed NOT to be. Literally...the San Andreas could knock California into the ocean and let it exist as its own little island and the world would be a better place. And that comes from someone that was born there.

Actually the entire United States would be in big trouble if, as you've said, "the San Andreas could knock California into the ocean, etc" Whew! and Trumpers say liberals are hate-filled? You are virtually engulfed and consumed with yours.

If for instance, a less violent event occurred, rather than a San Andreas catastrophe, California succeeded from the rest of the U.S., these are some things that would happen. Instead of paying taxes to the federal government, Californians would keep that money in the state. Yes California expects those tax dollars would increase California's budget by "hundreds of billions of dollars," seeing that the state has paid more in federal taxes than it has received in federal payouts (in the amount of double-digit billions) every year since 1995.

According to the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, California is the world's (not country's) fifth-largest economy. Its 2017 Gross State Product was $2.747 trillion, surpassing the United Kingdom's $2.625 trillion Gross Domestic Product. Domestically, the Golden State is the federal government’s largest contributor, with a GDP of $2.5 trillion. California's ranches and farms raked in $47 billion in crop cash receipts in 2015. It produces over a third of the country's vegetables and two-thirds of fruits and nuts, making California's agriculture industry the largest in the nation.

Here's what would happen in the rest of the states; Food prices would skyrocket. Shipping would be more difficult as shipments would be considered international shipments, rather those that cross state lines. The U.S. government could also impose higher tariffs, passing the costs directly to consumers. California's tourism alone brought in more than $122 billion to the state’s economy -- and more than three-quarters of its visitors were state residents. This helped create more than one million jobs. Come tax time, America would miss the Golden State. As the biggest contributor of federal taxes, California contributes 13.3 percent of all federal taxes collected.

Think twice before you wish a natural disaster on any of our 'United' States only because you despise liberals because they want to impeach your son of a bitch, ignorant, hateful president.
 
[h=1]

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’
[/h]
"According to this narrative, advanced by progressive historians, Nixon orchestrated a party switch on civil rights by converting the racists in the Democratic Party — the infamous Dixiecrats — into Republicans. And now, according to a recent article in The New Republic, President Trump is the “true heir, the beneficiary of the policies the party has pursued for more than half a century.”Yes, this story is in the textbooks and on the history channel and regularly repeated in the media, but is it true? First, no one has ever given a single example of an explicitly racist pitch by Nixon during his long career. One might expect that a racist appeal to the Deep South actually would have to be made, and to be understood as such. Yet, quite evidently none was."
"

Nixon barely campaigned in the Deep South. His strategy, as outlined by Kevin Phillips in his classic work, “The Emerging Republican Majority,” was to target the Sunbelt, the vast swath of territory stretching from Florida to Nixon’s native California. This included what Phillips terms the Outer or Peripheral South.
Nixon recognized the South was changing. It was becoming more industrialized, with many northerners moving to the Sunbelt. Nixon’s focus, Phillips writes, was on the non-racist, upwardly-mobile, largely urban voters of the Outer or Peripheral South. Nixon won these voters, and he lost the Deep South, which went to Democratic segregationist George Wallace.
And how many racist Dixiecrats did Nixon win for the GOP? Turns out, virtually none. Among the racist Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina was the sole senator to defect to the Republicans — and he did this long before Nixon’s time. Only one Dixiecrat congressman, Albert Watson of South Carolina, switched to the GOP. The rest, more than 200 Dixiecrat senators, congressmen, governors and high elected officials, all stayed in the Democratic Party."

The piece refrains from explaining why white southerners began to vote republican and why black southerners began to vote democrat after generations. LBJ predicted that the democrats would lose the south. Why? Whites there voted for Goldwater who opposed civil rights legislation. Why? Reagan has one of his first 1980 campaign stops and proclaimed his belief in states rights in Mississippi. Why? Maybe there was no “orchestration”, but there certainly was a strategy. Or maybe all this was coincidence following a series of legislative victories in civil rights.
 
He gives sex offenders hope of redemption and possibly careers in politics, for that we can all be eternally grateful.
...sure you aren't confusing President's? That POA sounds like it was intended for Bill Clinton(Hillary's husband)
Regards,
CP
 
Last edited:
If you are looking for reasons to or why Conservatives support Trump, then the following trumps all else...

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh
The potential of at least 1 and maybe 2 more Supreme Court nominees during the current term
Plus
Record low unemployment in black American communities
Record low unemployment in Latino American communities
Record low unemployment for women.
Record high opportunities for business startups groeth, and expansion.
Record low unemployment figures across the board.
Sustained economic growth with high GDP%s
Return of manufacturing jobs in the US which the previous administration insisted were lost for good.
additionally
Attempts to correct trade imbalances that have been created for many decades
Attempts to reduce the nuclear threat in peace negotiations with North Korea

All this while fighting a collection of mindless idiot leftists in congress and an inept republican congress.

I didnt vote for Trump. I wont vote for him regardless of who runs in 2020. However my opinion of him is similar to that of my opinion of Bill Clinton. Dood has the morals of a ****ing sewer rat...but I want to see him successful for the good of the country. Anyone that doesnt is just a ****ing moron in my book.
Well said. Standby for the usual tsunami of "Nu-uhs", "he inherited it from Obama", and assorted other mindless drivel.
 
Of course there was a strategy, it started with the Reagan campaign and Lee Atwater his campaign manager and head of the Republican National Convention and the 'Southern strategy'.

Read Lee Atwater's Wikipedia page. It says it all.
 
The piece refrains from explaining why white southerners began to vote republican and why black southerners began to vote democrat after generations. LBJ predicted that the democrats would lose the south. Why? Whites there voted for Goldwater who opposed civil rights legislation. Why? Reagan has one of his first 1980 campaign stops and proclaimed his belief in states rights in Mississippi. Why? Maybe there was no “orchestration”, but there certainly was a strategy. Or maybe all this was coincidence following a series of legislative victories in civil rights.

Are we to conclude you deny State Rights as part of the functioning Republic? And, bye the bye; there are no states in the northern tiers that value civil rights an much or more than the majority of southerner states!
Regards,
CP
 
Actually the entire United States would be in big trouble if, as you've said, "the San Andreas could knock California into the ocean, etc" Whew! and Trumpers say liberals are hate-filled? You are virtually engulfed and consumed with yours.

If for instance, a less violent event occurred, rather than a San Andreas catastrophe, California succeeded from the rest of the U.S., these are some things that would happen. Instead of paying taxes to the federal government, Californians would keep that money in the state. Yes California expects those tax dollars would increase California's budget by "hundreds of billions of dollars," seeing that the state has paid more in federal taxes than it has received in federal payouts (in the amount of double-digit billions) every year since 1995.

According to the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, California is the world's (not country's) fifth-largest economy. Its 2017 Gross State Product was $2.747 trillion, surpassing the United Kingdom's $2.625 trillion Gross Domestic Product. Domestically, the Golden State is the federal government’s largest contributor, with a GDP of $2.5 trillion. California's ranches and farms raked in $47 billion in crop cash receipts in 2015. It produces over a third of the country's vegetables and two-thirds of fruits and nuts, making California's agriculture industry the largest in the nation.

Here's what would happen in the rest of the states; Food prices would skyrocket. Shipping would be more difficult as shipments would be considered international shipments, rather those that cross state lines. The U.S. government could also impose higher tariffs, passing the costs directly to consumers. California's tourism alone brought in more than $122 billion to the state’s economy -- and more than three-quarters of its visitors were state residents. This helped create more than one million jobs. Come tax time, America would miss the Golden State. As the biggest contributor of federal taxes, California contributes 13.3 percent of all federal taxes collected.

Think twice before you wish a natural disaster on any of our 'United' States only because you despise liberals because they want to impeach your son of a bitch, ignorant, hateful president.
:lamo

What do you think happens to that states economy when the US cuts off all the federal contracts and tourism dries up as the entire state becomes one gigantic pile of **** NOT confined to the streets of San Francisco?

Think.
 
Well said. Standby for the usual tsunami of "Nu-uhs", "he inherited it from Obama", and assorted other mindless drivel.
Personally I have no qualms with anyone that wants to credit Obama with the economic recovery, as long as they are honest enough to admit that despite all the dire warnings from every idiot leftist both prior to and after his election the economy has continued to thrive.
 
:lamo

What do you think happens to that states economy when the US cuts off all the federal contracts and tourism dries up as the entire state becomes one gigantic pile of **** NOT confined to the streets of San Francisco?

Think.

Not a damned thing, that's what.
 
:lamo

Because you dont 'think'.

You're totally illogical and short-sighted. I should feel some sort of sympathy for you, but I don't.

:lamo :lamo :lamo :lamo
 
Are we to conclude you deny State Rights as part of the functioning Republic? And, bye the bye; there are no states in the northern tiers that value civil rights an much or more than the majority of southerner states!
Regards,
CP

No, the term “states rights” back then was code for segregation, a generation or two before, code for no investigations of lynching. States failed to follow the Constitution so the feds stepped in. And your evidence that southern states value civil rights more is?
 
Back
Top Bottom