Has the left leaning media, hollywood celebrities and political leaders overstepped in their rush to judge in cases like the Covington Catholic School students and the Jussie Smollett incendents?
yes
No
There's a reason that Trolling and flaming gets you suspended on most forums. The whole point of it is to agitate. You don't walk into UC Berkley pretending you want to educate students on right-wing lunacy unless you're hoping to get punched. You're intentionally trying to start an incident.And that justifies a physical assault?
Load of crap, Wonkster. He joked about that one or two times.
He's a punk eh? How often do you pick on children? Tell us more about what you would like to do to a child who wears a hat you don't like.
What ****ing world do you live in? Democrats have won the majority of votes in the house more than once in the last ten years and still didn't win the House. If it wasn't for courts throwing out a number of racist Republican district maps they still might not have been able to win.WHAT "overwhelming gerrymandering"? Specifics, please.
Then look up ballot harvesting.
Yeah, we have half a dozen declared Presidential candidates falling all over themselves seeing who can proposed the most outlandish free stuff giveaways and searching for ridiculous stuff to ban because "the people don't know what's good for them". IF the GOP is a dumpster fire, the Democratic Party is a portapotty fire.
When the Right ever gets around to judging Donald Trump for the constant lies, misdeeds and criminal acts they can start worrying about the 1 or 2 times liberals went a bit overboard. It's really just amazing how Liberals are expected to be perfect because we usually are, but the right get's a pass on everything because everything they do is horrible. The Right is like that ****ty kid who is always doing something stupid or horrible so at some point, you just stop getting disappointed. But when the kid who is a straight-A student skips 1 class we act like the sky is falling.
Huh? ::dohOooh, sick burn! "I know you are, but what am I?"
Where'd you learn how to debate? PeeWee's Playhouse?
WTF are you talking about. So Dems piled up big majorities in a few districts, but didn't win enough districts.What ****ing world do you live in? Democrats have won the majority of votes in the house more than once in the last ten years and still didn't win the House. If it wasn't for courts throwing out a number of racist Republican district maps they still might not have been able to win.
So let's hold new elections in the numerous California districts where it was also done.MrWonka said:You mean the thing that the Republican from North Carolina was doing that is now forcing a new election to be held?
And yet GOP picked up seats in the Senate were voting is state wide and gerrymandering would have no effect.MrWonka said:Sorry, buddy. Liberals don't need to cheat. We're the majority whether you like it or not.
Has the left leaning media, hollywood celebrities and political leaders overstepped in their rush to judge in cases like the Covington Catholic School students and the Jussie Smollett incendents?
yes
No
I asked you how often you pick on children. My support of Trump make you pick on children how exactly? Dodge again.You defend him because Trump is a punk too, I get that.
Has the left leaning media, hollywood celebrities and political leaders overstepped in their rush to judge in cases like the Covington Catholic School students and the Jussie Smollett incendents?
yes
No
Has the left leaning media, hollywood celebrities and political leaders overstepped in their rush to judge in cases like the Covington Catholic School students and the Jussie Smollett incendents?
yes
No
I asked you how often you pick on children. My support of Trump make you pick on children how exactly? Dodge again.
Has the left media, hollywood celebrities and political leadership overstepped condemning the right?
WHAT "overwhelming gerrymandering"? Specifics please. Then look up ballot harvesting.
Why is it that people cannot ask neutrally phrased questions without readers of the question inferring something about the inquirer? It's as though folks have forgotten the basics of grammar, one of which is the four types of sentences and their uses.
Your thinking that the OP-er asked the question with a presupposed stance on the nature of the existentially accurate answer is presumptuous of you. It is because the question contains nothing that suggests he does. Were the question loaded/leading, your inference could be warranted, depending on the load/lean; however, the OP-er's question is neutrally phrased (and there's nothing else in the OP that gives one any clues about load/lean), so one cannot infer the OP-er has a stance.
People routinely ask questions because they don't know the answer, know they don't know the answer, and want an/the answer. It's unfair to an inquirer to infer anything from a neutrally phrased interrogative sentence. Such sentences declare or imply nothing; they merely solicit information. Notwithstanding any exogenous context,
Rhetorical questions are a completely different thing. There can be much asserted and/or implied in such questions. The thing is that nobody with any sense would post a poll to pose a rhetorical question.
Republicans spent over four years digging and investigating Hillary Clinton, yet in all that time you could not come up with one single solitary charge to file against her. Nothing. In just two years the Mueller investigation(also headed by a registered Republican) has indicted more than 20 people including 6 high ranking members of the Trump campaign and named Trump himself as an unindicted co-conspirator to multiple felonies.
How you can even sleep at night making such an absolutely delusional statement is just astonishing.
Umm...no, what he said was that her actions were negligent, but not bad enough to call it a crime. In fact, it's been reported that Trump's kids have been using personal email for their government business as well.Oh Please give me a break....Remember what Comey said..she was guilty as sin but we won't prosecute after Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix.
Because all of this BS has been thoroughly debunked as nothing more than a crackpot conspiracy theory. Next, I supposed you're going to try and tell us about the child prostitution ring she ran out of that pizza joint right?I never saw any evidence that Lynch and the Obama Justice Department investigated the Clinton foundation or the Russian nuclear deal including $130 million Russian donations to her Foundation or the $500K Bill got for a speech in Moscow shortly before that deal closed.
I think you meant "too" objective, and spelling was the one class I did badly in.So, your analogy compares the right to a kid that " is always doing something stupid or horrible ", and the left to" the kid who is a straight-A student skips 1 class" ? Not to objective.
Oh, BTW, there's been more than 1 hate crime hoax.
We, here in California saw it on a grand scale, wanna guess which party the harvesters were from? Got anything else?Those of us here in NC know about ballot harvesting a good deal. Mark Harris is a well known name here for a reason. Want to guess which Party he's in?
We, here in California saw it on a grand scale, wanna guess which party the harvesters were from? Got anything else?
Has the left leaning media, hollywood celebrities and political leaders overstepped in their rush to judge in cases like the Covington Catholic School students and the Jussie Smollett incendents?
yes
No