I'm not aware of any pet store that sells 100's of dogs a month.The closest supplier doesn't buy hundreds of animals a month, supporting the mills.
I'm not aware of any pet store that sells 100's of dogs a month.The closest supplier doesn't buy hundreds of animals a month, supporting the mills.
Or, now that people are flooding to breeders, maybe they'll just sell them faster, younger, and cheaper?There will be no shortage of $1500 cockapoos. There will be less overproduction, which is clearly represented in state costs to clean up. That cost will decide success.
How does it remove their primary market? The market is very much still there.
If people are willing to pay $1500 or whatever for a cockapoo, do you think they're suddenly going to change their mind and pick up a mutt from the pound because this law was passed? I'm guessing they'll simply do a google search and pick the closest supplier.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...al-states-move-to-ban-sales-of-pets-in-storesMore than 250 municipalities have imposed their own bans or restrictions on pet sales and breeders.
I'm not aware of any pet store that sells 100's of dogs a month.
A "puppy mill" is a private breeder, is it not?The primary source of pet store dogs is puppy mills.
And if people buy direct from private breeders, which is fine, they'll pay much more than at a pet store.
So if they turn to reputable private breeders great. Btw rescues get loads of purebreds and every breed has its own purebred rescue society.
Or, now that people are flooding to breeders, maybe they'll just sell them faster, younger, and cheaper?
A "puppy mill" is a private breeder, is it not?
Yes, what's the legal distiction between the two?Yes but there's a distinction. Are you unaware of this distinction?
Or, now that people are flooding to breeders, maybe they'll just sell them faster, younger, and cheaper?
Maryland recently became the second state to ban retail pet stores from selling puppies and kittens, a move supporters of the legislation say will help discourage “puppy mills” that breed dogs in inhumane conditions and euthanize the animals when they are no longer able to breed. The law follows a similar one passed last year in California, though the Golden State will allow shops to sell cats, dogs and rabbits that came from shelters and rescue centers.
More than 250 municipalities have imposed their own bans or restrictions on pet sales and breeders. This fall, Ohio voters will decide whether to approve a statewide referendum that would require commercial breeders to meet prescribed standards of animal care and treatment, and would prohibit breeders and sellers – wherever they are located – from peddling pets to Ohio consumers unless those humane standards are met. And state lawmakers in New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey are working on their own legislation to ban puppy- and kitten-mill pet sales or encourage municipalities to do so.
That is a very true statement. They certainly have become the poster child in the test kitchens called the States on what not to do.
I don't know how you could even stand living there.
Did a flyover state just make a noise?
How does that make my signature any less funny?
Go ahead and trash a "flyover state" you have been doing it for years.
You want it to come off as if I posted that for pretty much no reason, which isn’t the case.
JFC, dude, you used to have a sense of humor. What happened to you?
There are millions of stupid ways one can go about trying to save animals' lives. The fact that your intentions are good doesn't make it a good law.
This isn't new. Bodi + pets + X = this.
Oh good god. Just stop with the caracaturey.You have no idea what you're talking about. Seriously. Nobody is going to "flock" to breeders; first, nobody knows where they are because they hide in rural areas, and second, did you look at the photos of actual puppy mills in this thread?? Do you honestly think anyone looking for a family pet would choose to take one that is matted, living in filth? Unless, of course, they are in the dog fighting game, where they'd buy those puppies by the gross to be torn apart while training their fighting animals.
Tens of thousands of pet stores, maybe as many as hundreds of thousands in California alone, import literally hundreds of thousands of these animals from out of state every year. If California law can prevent that from happening, maybe a few dozen other states will follow suit until breeding animals in pain and squalor is no long economically viable. One could only hope.
So that means you hate women - right?So, those animals should have no chance at survival - right? So California's overloaded animal shelters do not make good pets for stores to offer - right?
I live in a pretty conservative part of California.
Oh good god. Just stop with the caracaturey.
I will, thank you.
“Pets”?
instead of being man enough to quote my entire post