• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is it a bad thing that Tucker feels he cant take his family to dinner?

Is it a bad thing that Tucker feels he cant take his family to dinner?


  • Total voters
    91
True, it was one of the first videos that popped up when I searched for it. Obviously it was going to be biased as it was from the Daily Caller which is Tucker's website.

Also, it was reported they beat on his door and the security camera allegedly picked up some of the protesters speaking about pipe bombs. However, that is coming from Tucker and I haven't seen any proof of that.

if true thats sick and i hope the video can identify them!
and i wasnt implying that you posted the video claiming it was not biased FYI i was just saying . . anytime i see that holder video I always laugh since he says next he is not talking about any inappropriate or illegal but metaphorically to be tough or something like that.
Blows my mind that nutters left and right get away with showing video CLIPS or something and so many people believe it when the whole version is out there . . .
 
I am too stoned for you clearly...If the DP poll produces wrong data somebody should look into fixing it.

:lol: The poll is always right and so your post is accurate.

17/64 is 26%. I thought it was funny to write it like that but I'm easily amused at times.
 
I am too stoned for you clearly...If the DP poll produces wrong data somebody should look into fixing it.

Maybe you should take one less hit off the bong.
 
The notion that people with differing views "need" to be made uncomfortable is next-level anarchist b.s.

It's very self-important and self-righteous.
 
It's very self-important and self-righteous.

Not to mention, totalitarian. I think it's scary times that so many want to normalize this complete lack of civility.
 
The bottom line on all this is that our nation elected Donald Trump. That one act defines the era. Those that support him are guilty by association. Those that publicly support him using tactics similar to how he was elected are just as guilty as Trump for the outcomes. Trump himself is an abomination, a man that should be thrown out of office due to public shame alone. Spare me the crocodile tears about a Tucker Carlson, he hitched his star to right wing propaganda a long time ago. I feel nothing for him, nothing.
 
The bottom line on all this is that our nation elected Donald Trump. That one act defines the era. Those that support him are guilty by association. Those that publicly support him using tactics similar to how he was elected are just as guilty as Trump for the outcomes. Trump himself is an abomination, a man that should be thrown out of office due to public shame alone. Spare me the crocodile tears about a Tucker Carlson, he hitched his star to right wing propaganda a long time ago. I feel nothing for him, nothing.

Given everything you've said here, what makes you better?
 
I don’t think you know what “fascist” means.

Oh, I do. And I also know exactly how the fascists behaved when thugging their way to power, which is what I clearly and overtly referred to.
 
Oh, I do. And I also know exactly how the fascists behaved when thugging their way to power, which is what I clearly and overtly referred to.

Yes, I clearly remember learning of Mussolini giving his predecessor the business in the Great Trattoria Heckling Incident of 1921.
 
TUCKER CARLSON did.

Great. If you can find me referring to that to support anything I said, or making any reference to damage to the door, then please do so.
 
Yes, I clearly remember learning of Mussolini giving his predecessor the business in the Great Trattoria Heckling Incident of 1921.

:roll:

The entire reason for the existence of the SA was to harass people in public, including in private spaces like restaurants, meeting halls, churhces, beer halls, etc., and just out on the street.

You probably know that. But if not, such historical ignorance, willful or not, is not my problem.
 
Carlson is not a journalist.

He is a commentator paid to provide a perspective.

It isn't the same thing.

And his "work" contributed to our current divide. It is his job.

Kinda like Rush Limbaugh. <YUCK>

In that case, if as a non-journalist he's contributing to the chaos without giving the public an opportunity to challenge his claims or accusations, he deserves whatever amount of "private disruption" he gets....as long as nobody gets hurt.
 
Not to mention, totalitarian. I think it's scary times that so many want to normalize this complete lack of civility.

Yes. Yes, it is.
 
Can anybody really enjoy a meal with cruz' face at the table?

Sane people, yeah. Leftist loons probably not so much. That's why they need to be locked up. ;) (Just in case you believe I'm serious.)
 
If you vote Republican you vote for telling me how to live.

Not caring makes it worse, not better.
If by that you mean you show work if your able, pay your taxes, and show a little civility to people who disagree with you. You're absolutely correct. But it isn't Republicans telling you what and how much you should eat and drink, which school you children must attend and what that school has to feed them for lunch. It's not the right passing laws and imposing taxes to make you behave the way THEY think you should live and behave.
 
This thread reminds me of the 1950's when segregation was the norm. Instead of "No colored here" here, it is your pollical view is not wanted in this restaurant
 
Showing up at someone's house to harass them, trespass, slam on their door, and scream at them - because they politically disagree - IS FASCIST TACTICS, not free speech.
 
How about if that doctor gave his patient a drug he knew was dangerous but the pharmaceutical company paid him a fat kickback and your loved one died?

People aren't mad at people like Carlson because of something he did by accident.

They are mad about what he does, cynically, with eyes wide open.

For money.


But where is the proof that he is getting money? That is the point there, there is no proof.
 
Back
Top Bottom