• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2020 Election

Who Would You Vote For In 2020?

  • Total voters
    33
Kreton said:
You cannot pretend you care about rapists when you have pledged your loyalty to one. You love, support, worship and encourage rapists so your opinion is not important to me. I don't care what you think of me. I am sure what you find laughable is rape. So like I said before take your trolling elsewhere. You aren't baiting me.
Click to expand...

No surprise how you lefty liberals make **** up. You don't need evidence you just make it up. Elizabeth Warren, I'm Cheerice, and of late your hero who claims she was molested 36 yrs ago but has zero evidence to support her claim.
 
Born Free said:
No surprise how you lefty liberals make **** up. You don't need evidence you just make it up. Elizabeth Warren, I'm Cheerice, and of late your hero who claims she was molested 36 yrs ago but has zero evidence to support her claim.
Click to expand...

No surprise to me how you lefty liberals make up claims to support your super liberal candidate Trump. I like your signatures middle line - Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff. Which is exactly what Trump is doing and you are supporting. Face it, you are a liberal. So is Trump. Trumpists are just hate filled, racist, sexual predator enabling liberals but liberals none the less. Evidence is all there - you just refuse to see it because you are incapable of intelligent thought, reasoning or logic skills. You simply regurgitate what Trump tells you to. Your only source of information is and verification is his twitter feed and fox news.
 
Phys251 said:
:lamo

Such a cute insult from the side that constantly struggles with basic reading comprehension!
Click to expand...

Not cute at all. You either didn't read the OP or you didn't understand it. Which one is it?
 
Helix said:
I'll be voting for the person who has the best chance of defeating Trump. Democrats had better not drop the ball this time.
Click to expand...

Yea like you're side deserves power again.
 
enderpotato00 said:
Yea like you're side deserves power again.
Click to expand...

i mostly just have a "side" to vote against. unfortunately, i generally only get to bring spitballs to that gun fight, because the Democratic party can't seem to find its ass with a searchlight and a Rand McNally.
 
Helix said:
i mostly just have a "side" to vote against. unfortunately, i generally only get to bring spitballs to that gun fight, because the Democratic party can't seem to find its ass with a searchlight and a Rand McNally.
Click to expand...

Ah ok. I have a side to vote against too. Generally democrats.
 
Helix said:
i mostly just have a "side" to vote against. unfortunately, i generally only get to bring spitballs to that gun fight, because the Democratic party can't seem to find its ass with a searchlight and a Rand McNally.
Click to expand...

Democrats will nominate whoever wins the most votes in the Democratic primary. And your choice of candidate is determined by whoever decides to declare themselves a candidate in the Democratic primary.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Democrats will nominate whoever wins the most votes in the Democratic primary. And your choice of candidate is determined by whoever decides to declare themselves a candidate in the Democratic primary.
Click to expand...

i hope that they do something out of character and pick an electable candidate.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Again, it all depends on who decides to run.
Click to expand...

it also depends on the DNC not being complete ****ing idiots and grooming some new candidates instead. it depends on current leadership stepping down and making way for new people so that there will be compelling new candidates. they lost the map, they lost the court, they lost congress, and a dude who isn't fit to tie his own shoes controls the nukes.

exactly how badly do you have to **** up to lose your leadership position?
 
Helix said:
it also depends on the DNC not being complete ****ing idiots and grooming some new candidates instead. it depends on current leadership stepping down and making way for new people so that there will be compelling new candidates. they lost the map, they lost the court, they lost congress, and a dude who isn't fit to tie his own shoes controls the nukes.

exactly how badly do you have to **** up to lose your leadership position?
Click to expand...

For whatever reason, they have not lost the faith of their caucus.

The endorsement primary is just as important as the actual one, because I would prefer if our candidate had the United support of the Democratic Party.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
For whatever reason, they have not lost the faith of their caucus.

The endorsement primary is just as important as the actual one, because I would prefer if our candidate had the United support of the Democratic Party.
Click to expand...

you have a large "vote against" resource to tap into, and i'm part of it. my suggestion to leadership is to message effectively and run someone who is likely to win.
 
Helix said:
you have a large "vote against" resource to tap into, and i'm part of it. my suggestion to leadership is to message effectively and run someone who is likely to win.
Click to expand...

Don’t worry, we won’t let Andrew Cuomo win the primary

But my advice: pay attention at who ever is receiving the most endorsements from the party.
 
Please let Hiawatha win the socialist primary! Please!
 
image_82e21ae8c1f345a11ecfbe9c9ae1b05982c85c39.png
 
Helix said:
Don't know. Crystal ball is in the shop.
Click to expand...

Come on, with all the liberals hanging around and you can't pick one. That's really a bad state of affairs, you don't have one person sitting on the bench. Your telling me your bench is empty?
 
Born Free said:
Come on, with all the liberals hanging around and you can't pick one. That's really a bad state of affairs, you don't have one person sitting on the bench. Your telling me your bench is empty?
Click to expand...

i don't have a bench. if you're talking about the Democratic bench, i'm not happy that finding a candidate and putting out great messaging isn't a higher and more obvious priority for them. their candidate will almost certainly be my only viable way at the polls to express my utter disgust for the national embarrassment that is Trump. they need to nominate someone who is very likely to win.
 
Moderate Right said:
With Trump and Warren going at it recently it's not so far fetched to think that the election could boil down to these two being the nominees of the two major parties. Who would you vote for?
Click to expand...

I'm a left-leaning progressive and not a fan of Donald Trump or the Republican Party, so Trump isn't exactly an option for me, here, and I don't view the upcoming presidential race the same way I viewed the last.

My knee-jerk reaction was to vote 'someone else', because based on his behavior, and his reluctance to outright deny it, it would seem that Bernie Sanders intends on running again, or at the very least, he simply isn't going quietly into the night. I ended up going with Warren, simply because she's the closest thing to that.

The Democrats, in my opinion, are shooting themselves in the foot if they run some establishment prick, which they most certainly will try to do. Cable news outlets and traditional media in general vastly underestimated a Trump victory, and while I suspect that some of that had to do with trying to push a narrative, I think it's pretty clear that most of these people are trapped in a bubble where a 90's political play-book is still relevant. Not a lot seems to have changed since then, and I predict that the DNC will overemphasize the unpopularity of the president and will fail to consider the fact that he's an incumbent, or how unpopular they are.

The only way the Democrats have a solid chance of defeating Trump is if they nominate a progressive. They need someone that's capable of getting people excited; to give some of those who voted for Trump purely on anti-establishment frustration a reason to vote for them.

Warren wouldn't be my first choice. She'd probably be my second. She's better than other Democrats by far, but she has a habit of making political miscalculations that don't appease anybody.
 
Last edited:
Moderate Right said:
Trump is the greatest threat to liberalism. It's no wonder the left have tried every trick in the book to bring him down.
Click to expand...

The greatest threat to liberalism, is the dumbest liberals.

Trump is the greatest threat to the right, which is why I'm glad that he won instead of Clinton. Better that you guys have to bend over backwards to defend him, rather the reverse.
 
DH Kirkwood said:
The greatest threat to liberalism, is the dumbest liberals.

Trump is the greatest threat to the right, which is why I'm glad that he won instead of Clinton. Better that you guys have to bend over backwards to defend him, rather the reverse.
Click to expand...

His ideas are a direct assault on the dogma of the Left. What is so depressing is that so many of the DimWits on the Left believe that these ideas mostly go away when Trump does, so they put all of their energy into trying to get Trump gone (failing spectacularly to this point) rather than dealing with the ideas that he spreads. They are still after all this time committed to labeling people and ideas that they dont like garbage and then ignoring them, they have learned nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom