• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kavanaugh.... What next?

What new accusations will be made?

  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Harshaw said:
If it were a bench trial, no judge would hold it satisfies doubt. It would easily be reversed on appeal. The question is never if "reasonable people wouldn't" do something. It's whether not the individual on trial did or didn't.

If it were a jury trial, the instructions to the jury would likely make it clear that what other people may or may not normally do is not dispositive of the question of whether the defendant did it.

Not that it matters, because any competent defense counsel would have objected any such notion out of evidence anyway, and if he couldn't, he would have a strong closing statement and grounds for appeal.
Click to expand...

You have no evidence of any of this.
 
DifferentDrummr said:
So you admit to not having evidence. I thought so.
Click to expand...

DifferentDrummr, up and down this thread: "I will believe exactly what I choose to believe no matter what."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom