• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Kavanaugh be confirmed?

Will Kavanaugh be confirmed?

  • Total voters
    49
  • Poll closed .
jet57 said:
I can see the point you're trying to make, partisan as it is, but I don't think Ford wants any more to d with this: her life will never be the same. Kavanaugh has a besmirched reputation now, so anything he says from the bench will be suspect, so Ford was successful in spite of losing her battle. She may however turn around and decide to press charges, who knows, but I think it's just too soon to tell.
Click to expand...

she'd be lucky not to get indicted for perjury among other things. She has no chance of getting a conviction against Kavanaugh but the Republican US Attorney in DC can get a perjury conviction against her fairly easily
 
Nap said:
Actually, whether the SOL has run out or not is disputed. It will depend on if the prosecutor were to charge as a felony or misdemeanor. A felony has no SOL, however a misdemeanor does.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...gQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw061YOaHdbPuOjT0xfZe3TG&cf=1
Click to expand...

he would have to make an argument that what Kavanaugh did was not juvenile delinquency and merits adult court

given no one she mentioned has backed up her story I doubt anyone with a brain would take the case. and being bound over to adult court normally is based on several factors

most of which involve prior acts of delinquency.
 
I am just glad this smear campaign failed. I am sick of accusations without evidence. Too many innocent people have already suffered from this kind of nonsense.
 
haymarket said:
I don't follow you?
Click to expand...

Sorry, it was sort of a snarky reply to the idea of having a poll of who thinks the Sun would rise as posed by Haymarket, and the clear right of those with good sense to have a laugh at denier's expense. I didn't mean to confuse. Is that better, or should I try to clear it further?
Regards,
CP
 
concernedpuma said:
Sorry, it was sort of a snarky reply to the idea of having a poll of who thinks the Sun would rise as posed by Haymarket, and the clear right of those with good sense to have a laugh at denier's expense. I didn't mean to confuse. Is that better, or should I try to clear it further?
Regards,
CP
Click to expand...

thank you for taking the time to explain.
 
haymarket said:
thank you for taking the time to explain.
Click to expand...

My pleasure, friend. If I write anything that isn't clear, and I sometimes believe I am writing what I am thinking, but it type's it another way. In those instances, please help me by allowing me to explain, if you do see that.
Regards,
CP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom