• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will you respect the findings of the FBI report?

Will you respect the findings of the FBI report?


  • Total voters
    62
Regardless if you think Kavanaugh did it or not right now. Will you respect the findings of the FBI when they come out?

The findings of the FBI report are irrelevant.
 
Can you link that for me? I don't recall seeing that.

I am hoping that the FBI will make a definitive statement of some sort. However I am aware that whoever heads the investigation may call a press conference, walk up to the podium, shrug and then say that is all and no further questions.

This is the most likely scenario as there simply isn't enough information to base an investigation on. Thinking the FBI will be able to come with conclusive evidence either way with the information we currently have seems rather irrational to me.

As far as will anyone accept the results, the FBI investigated Clarence Thomas and reported that Hill's claims were unfounded. Given many of the remarks made about him should give you an idea about how some respect the findings of the FBI.
 
Yup. A better question might be: if the FBI finds no evidence that Kavanaugh did what he is accused of, will folks who believed him guilty change their mind, and Visa versa.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

The FBI finding no evidence will not prove him innocent.

If the Senate had gone this route earlier, and no evidence was found, it is likely Ford would not have testified, and he'd be on his way to SCOTUS. She was completely credible, and I believe her. Obviously there are some Senators sitting on the fence over this, and this buys them some time to try to get their ducks in a row. Grassley blew this one big time, and now even Trump is scurrying to get on the right side of this.
 
Regardless if you think Kavanaugh did it or not right now. Will you respect the findings of the FBI when they come out?

i will have to see the results and what the senate does with them
 
Anti Welfare to whom? To the anti causes towards their lifestyle?


There are certain players that can play. The college graduated and elected, the supporters, the citizens, the gift givers... There might be some others but these seem to be the bulk of what availability there is. The college graduated/elected, the supporters, the citizens and the 'gift' givers.


Both the wolves and true would come from one of these groups, if they are legal U.S citizens.

So to the college graduated/elected, the anti welfare agenda towards their life might be a different ideology than for the citizen or even a supporter. What might be an anti Welfare agenda to the citizen or what might be an anti Welfare agenda to the supporter?


Why did they leave the one with the European background?


Maybe because he was less anti Welfare agenda to the investigators' stances of living.


If both were guilty of a punishable offense, but if only 1 of them received the punishment, although both were known to be involved, is that discrimination, partiality, prejudicism, biasness, preferential? What could it be that the crime was not stopped?


Are there those that say and claim that such drives to some kind of Governmental make over CANNOT be put to a stop? The race to some one world power or some Globalization or some Governmental Possession is nothing but a 'making over' to the current ones.


Home makeover.
Government makeover.
World makeover.



This is actually a boy.. Which one? The one with the platinum blond hair.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWaULmaXqjA&t=3s


Some guys just really get 'hot under the collar' by such male/female persons. Both out of and in bed.


But with seriousness. He reminds me of Martha Stewart in a way.


What occurs when you live next to an open mini Electrial power plant boxes and you begin to feel 'waves' of electricity coming into your apartment in timed intervals? Enough so that you can feel the timed intervals even while in the bathroom? Does that mean that the boxes are about to 'blow up' or something?
 
Last edited:
Regardless if you think Kavanaugh did it or not right now. Will you respect the findings of the FBI when they come out?
Red:
Perhaps, verging to "yes." I'm not going to, this instant, say "yes" for a few reasons:
  • I don't know that the report will be made public.
  • I don't know that the report, if it's made public, will be made so in unredacted (aside from things like street addresses, phone numbers, SSNs and other details the general public doesn't need to know) form.
    • I don't need the report to publicly identify by name the persons who provided "this and that" statements/information, but I think we deserve to know that the FBI found folks who were found to be credible and who said such and such.
  • I don't know that the report will be made public to everyone at the same time. I may have some doubts were I to learn that it, and progress on the investigation were made available to the WH or Congress during the investigation or in advance of the report being made available to the general public.
    • I would be fine, however, were investigators (not the political appointees higher up in the hierarchy) to publish to the Internet the ongoing list of prospective interviewees along with a daily status report of so the public know what's going on. After all, there's nothing (other than the above noted data elements) about this investigation that need be kept classified, confidential or secret.

I do trust FBI investigators. I don't trust Trump and his cronies to not try putting their finger on the report so as to minimize or make vague or ambiguous whatever negative information it contains and accentuate or make vague or ambiguous whatever positive information it contains. That is, after all, the single biggest problem I have with Trump and his cronies: one minute they say "A" and then days, weeks, or months later we learn the truth is something vastly different from, if not the very opposite of "A." I've had it with that ****!
 
The FBI finding no evidence will not prove him innocent.

If the Senate had gone this route earlier, and no evidence was found, it is likely Ford would not have testified, and he'd be on his way to SCOTUS. She was completely credible, and I believe her. Obviously there are some Senators sitting on the fence over this, and this buys them some time to try to get their ducks in a row. Grassley blew this one big time, and now even Trump is scurrying to get on the right side of this.

you believe her? ok, tell us why she didnt remember when it happened, who drove her there, who drove her home but she did remember it was him, Tell us why said she was afraid to fly yet flew on planes travelling around the globe, tell us why she remembered it was kavanaugh from 36 years ago, but couldnt remember what she did a month ago on the day of her grandmothers funeral? Tell us why her witnesses refuted her. Tell us if this woman has any history of anti Trump in her past.
Thats just for starters.
 
you believe her? ok, tell us why she didnt remember when it happened, who drove her there, who drove her home but she did remember it was him, Tell us why said she was afraid to fly yet flew on planes travelling around the globe, tell us why she remembered it was kavanaugh from 36 years ago, but couldnt remember what she did a month ago on the day of her grandmothers funeral? Tell us why her witnesses refuted her. Tell us if this woman has any history of anti Trump in her past.
Thats just for starters.

I would suggest you do some research into the subject of victims of sexual abuse, and what they remember, and what they don't. It might help you a bit. Also, do take a look and see that her witnesses did not refute her. There is one who shall be an interesting subject for the FBI...currently hiding out at the beach. He does not seem so enthusiastic about supporting his pal.

Flying fears? I don't know. Perhaps she takes medication for her flights, and wanted a clear head for the hearing? Just a wild guess. This topic is so stupidly off track that it is sad it's the biggest thing her detractors have.

She was completely credible, even your sorry ass President thinks so. Just for starters.

And last but not least, most of the country is anti Trump. It is not remarkable in any way.
 
Yes, both sides of the aisle is asking a very good question regarding the FBI.

What I find interesting neither side of the aisle is asking why Ford and the others have not filed criminal or civil complaint through their respective lawyers. Especially now that they have come forward.

If the sexual attacks took place it seems more appropriate to run it through the courts rather than some Senate committee.

A couple of things.

First of all, this is a job interview for SCOTUS, which would be a lifetime appointment. Kavanaugh's threshold to clear his name here is much higher than the threshold that would be required for a not guilty verdict in court.

Second, it is 100% up to his accusers whether they press charges or not, and when. It is my understanding that the state of Maryland has no statute of limitations as to the criminal allegations that would suit Kavanaugh and Judge in that specific case.

Third, how come there were no sexual assault allegations against Gorsuch? Or, for that matter, Alito and Stevens? Seems as if at least some conservative SCOTUS justices understood the concept of consent.
 
What occurs when you live next to an open mini Electrial power plant boxes and you begin to feel 'waves' of electricity coming into your apartment in timed intervals? Enough so that you can feel the timed intervals even while in the bathroom? Does that mean that the boxes are about to 'blow up' or something?



So first the electrical boxes in the min Electrial company plant began making 'zapping' sounds. Like ... zzzzzaaaaaaaapppppppppppp. zzzzzzzzzzaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppppppppppppppp. Then it became more frequent. Then it began ending in a 'popping' sound at the end of the zzzzzaaaaaaaaappppppppppppp. zzzaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppppppp pop zzzzzzzaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap pop Some electricians were there another day with the boxes open looking furious as hell for some reason. They finally left but the zzaaapppping got more frequent. The incident was reported, the zaappiing went away but now the waves of electrical currents that can be felt coming into the apartment in timed intervals. For time amounts per wave. Not sporadic. Same intervals time same amounts of bzzzzzz. bzzzzzzz. inside the unit. A low frequency feeling/buzzing and even beginning to be heard inside the head as it is felt . It can be felt even in the bathrooms and is beginning to be felt from within my body, as in my feet and such.

I'm not an electrician so I wouldn't know. but if there any electricians out there, is this possible?



Maybe the story line goes like this. Since I'm ill and don't intend on getting better nor denying that I have a life long illness, I'm going to bring every one else around me to the grave with me. hahahahahaha...


But for some strange reason, I keep hearing that guy's voice in my head from all the way over here. Can you please tell him to shut up???


I've learned a valuable lesson. When doing meth, don't ask or request some 'spiritual thing' to be able to hear thoughts or read thoughts. It might be granted!!!!


I don't know.. I keep trying and trying but never receiving anything but mercy them.
 
Last edited:
I would suggest you do some research into the subject of victims of sexual abuse, and what they remember, and what they don't. It might help you a bit. Also, do take a look and see that her witnesses did not refute her. There is one who shall be an interesting subject for the FBI...currently hiding out at the beach. He does not seem so enthusiastic about supporting his pal.

Flying fears? I don't know. Perhaps she takes medication for her flights, and wanted a clear head for the hearing? Just a wild guess. This topic is so stupidly off track that it is sad it's the biggest thing her detractors have.

She was completely credible, even your sorry ass President thinks so. Just for starters.

And last but not least, most of the country is anti Trump. It is not remarkable in any way.

the topic is off track? hahahahhah....oh so was she raped on the day if her grandmothers funeral last month? Is that why she cant remember what happened that day either. Even more harious you cite off topic then bash trump...who has nothing to do with her testimony. Sorry my questions were difficult for you but they were not off topic. That makes you a liar as they were not. So were they off topic or not? Let me know as I ignore liars because I find them to be facebooky noobs who have no place on political forums.
 
Regardless if you think Kavanaugh did it or not right now. Will you respect the findings of the FBI when they come out?

I would respect the findings of the report in so far as I know what they will be, it will be a bunch of witness statement forms echoing what the committee has already been told. If a witness changes their story then that’s a problem because the primary witnesses to Fords account have already preduced affidavits disclaiming memory and in that anyone who changes their story is a liar and that will only further complicate matters
 
Yup. A better question might be: if the FBI finds no evidence that Kavanaugh did what he is accused of, will folks who believed him guilty change their mind, and Visa versa.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

The FBI does not make conclusions but they will be giving lie detector tests. If Mark Judge fails will you be surprised?
 
I'm unsettled by the fact that the White House will be the conduit for the FBI's report. I'm also uncertain about the intention behind the word, "scope."
 
I've learned a valuable lesson. When doing meth, don't ask or request some 'spiritual thing' to be able to hear thoughts or read thoughts. It might be granted!!!!


I don't know.. I keep trying and trying but never receiving anything but mercy them.




It was not until this happened that I kind of thought, what the heck anyways??

As the zzzaaaaaaaapppppppppppp. zzzzzzaaaaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppppp. sounds were occurring frequently and irregularly throughout the day and as pedestrians were walking on the sidewalk no more than 15 yards away from the open Electrical box plant(s) area, they didn't even flinch a little when it occurred, out of nowhere, right as they were passing by. Not even one flinch whereas here I was, way further away than 15 yards, shaken in startledness in my seat everytime that came out of nowhere.


That's when I thought, boy.. I must be overreacting or something. Either that or I was imagining those zzzzaaaaaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppp. zzzzzzzzzzzzaaaappppppppppppppppppppp.
 
Last edited:
Has it been officially stated if the investigation is looking into ALL the known accusations or just the one from Dr. Ford?

That would heavily weigh on my answer to the thread question.

Since Dr. Ford is the one accusing I suspect the investigation will be into that accusation....

Is there some other crime you would like a witch hunt for?
 
I'm unsettled by the fact that the White House will be the conduit for the FBI's report. I'm also uncertain about the intention behind the word, "scope."

You appear unsettles these days.

There was an accusation. Should not the investigation concentrate on that accusation?
 
The FBI does not make conclusions but they will be giving lie detector tests. If Mark Judge fails will you be surprised?

:shrug: I "failed" my first one on the question of "what day is it" - and I answered correctly.

Lie Detector Tests are - as I understand it - mostly beneficial because people feel the need to "come clean" during the session or just beforehand, or get nervous because of the machine, and start to self-contradict.
 
Since Dr. Ford is the one accusing I suspect the investigation will be into that accusation....

Is there some other crime you would like a witch hunt for?

Actually the investigation will also include the other 2 claims and a bunch of lie detector tests. Getting worried yet?
 
:shrug: I failed my first one on the question of "what day is it" - and I answered correctly.

Lie Detector Tests are - as I understand it - mostly beneficial because people feel the need to "come clean" during the session or just beforehand, or get nervous because of the machine, and start to self-contradict.

The veracity always depends on the skill of the operator. Luckily Brett can't complain since he has ruled them admissible for background checks.
 
I'm unsettled by the fact that the White House will be the conduit for the FBI's report. I'm also uncertain about the intention behind the word, "scope."

My bet is that that means it won't involve rape gangs that took place for years in the basement of washington dc pizza parlors.
 
Can you link that for me? I don't recall seeing that.

I am hoping that the FBI will make a definitive statement of some sort. However I am aware that whoever heads the investigation may call a press conference, walk up to the podium, shrug and then say that is all and no further questions.

They present facts. It is up to the senate to decide based on those facts.

"The FBI will ultimately report its findings — which, in Kavanaugh’s case, will probably be mostly reports of interviews — to the White House. The bureau will not conclude whether the accusers are believable or not, or tell the White House whether it should withdraw Kavanaugh’s nomination."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.33c8d4f920b0
 
Last edited:
As a Democrat, I would accept the findings, but would oppose him based on ideological reasons.

Even if nothing is found, something else to consider. The Senate needs to look at this guy's temperament. He's a partisan hothead. Is that what we want for the highest court in the land?

But yes - to answer the question, I will accept the findings, despite the fact that they've only got a minute and a half to investigate.

Bring somebody else up. I opposed Gorsuch based on the nuclear option of getting him in, plus I opposed him based on ideology. But there's a big difference in Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. HUGE difference.
 
The veracity always depends on the skill of the operator.

Not entirely at all, though their quality can impact it, certainly.

Luckily Brett can't complain since he has ruled them admissible for background checks.

.....Sort of. He ruled that the government had submitted paperworking stating that it used them, but that the literature is decidedly not in their favor as far as them being an effective tool, and that therefore releasing their content could allow people to subvert them. His opinion was that polygraphs can be manipulated. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom