• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did Bill Clinton rape Juanita Broadderick?

Did Bill Clinton rape Juanita Broadderick?


  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
because the leftist mindset places individuals in a subordinate position to the 'greater good'
And have no problems trampling on people's constitutional rights in doing so.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
 
Unfortunately, women use illegitimate allegations of rape and sexual assault as means to their own ends. This creates a credibility crisis for real victims. The environment women have created of not acknowledging the bogus claims may ultimately be what has undermined the situation.
 
Possibly. I'll tell you what, I won't support his nomination to the Supreme Court without an investigation.

An investigation that lasts until the next Senate is seated ..... "Flip a coin. Heads I win; tails you lose"
 

I am curious, do you think this should have been fully investigated before the election?

If so, can you see why we want a proper investigation of the sexual assault claims concerning Kavenaugh before he is allowed to take a lifetime appointment?
 
Yup and he did in Vince Foster too.
Such stupidity.
You do know MAGA was our WWII Nazi group name?
Oh, you do??

Why stupidity?

Did you see the Lisa Myers interview with her?

You also missed all the Leftists coming out saying the Democrat Party has some soul searching and reckoning to do due to their defense of the rapist.

Unlike the BS Parade we have now, Juanita B told her friends, had physical injuries, and nobody could find a hole in her story.

The Leftists are one thing, and that is consistent in their inconsistency.
 
Last edited:
righties still obsessing about the clintons

or

trying the redirect to get the heat off Kavanaugh
 
righties still obsessing about the clintons

or

trying the redirect to get the heat off Kavanaugh

or

insisting everyone be held to the same standard......
 
We will never know because politicians are given a pass when it comes to these things. He should have been thoroughly investigated and this woman's claims should have been taken seriously.
 
#kavanaugh_defense_byblamingclinton_gopbullcrap

Why so tense?

Were you an ardent Clinton rape defender?

Are you capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time?
 

To be able to prove rape in a court of law now, no. Is her account disturbing, definitely. Do I tend to believe her, yeah. Do I wish she or her friends had contacted police immediately to gather physical evidence, yes. Do I think her doing so at the time would have changed the outcome, sadly no.
 
If you want to make the case that Bill Clinton assaulted anybody then Juanita Broadderick probably isn't the strongest example to go with. She said in public that he did but swore in a signed affidavit that he didn't. I don't know how to explain that kind of discrepancy.
 
righties still obsessing about the clintons

or

trying the redirect to get the heat off Kavanaugh

No just trying to shed light on the hypocrisy.
 
If you want to make the case that Bill Clinton assaulted anybody then Juanita Broadderick probably isn't the strongest example to go with. She said in public that he did but swore in a signed affidavit that he didn't. I don't know how to explain that kind of discrepancy.

No one's ever signed an affidavit under duress before. These were powerful people she was dealing with.
 
No one's ever signed an affidavit under duress before. These were powerful people she was dealing with.

That's the first I've heard of her being under duress during the affidavit. Do you have a link?
 
That's the first I've heard of her being under duress during the affidavit. Do you have a link?

I don't, just IMHO, as she did not want to be drawn into the case against Clinton at the time.
 
I don't, just IMHO, as she did not want to be drawn into the case against Clinton at the time.

Er...well, okay. I'm just saying, if you feel like she made that affidavit under duress, I'm going to need a tad more than your opinion. Keep in mind that I'm not joined at the hip to my position.
 
Last time I voted Republican at the presidential level was in 2000. Bill Clinton's indiscretions were a big reason why.

(And yes, dear laysplainers, I know he wasn't running then.)
 
Why so tense?

Were you an ardent Clinton rape defender?

Are you capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time?

1. Not tense, you are making that up

2. well, I believe in innocent until proven differently, ,that goes for Kavanaugh as well as Clinton. Now if the senate believes this Kavanaugh accuser that is on them. So to claim I am an ardent Clinton rape defender is utter tripe/bullcrap/nonsense/BS and it says way more about you than my response said about me.

3. And no, I cannot chew gum due to a medical issue, but thanks for the stupid ass insult which again shows everything about you and your "personality".
 
An investigation that lasts until the next Senate is seated ..... "Flip a coin. Heads I win; tails you lose"

Well it should be investigated once Bill is nominated to the Supreme Court. I am 100 percent in favor of that.
 

I do not know, and while I do believe Bill Clinton has engaged in other acts of sexual impropriety, I would need to see the evidence regarding the Juanita Broderick matter. When I am dealing with a politician who is a member of the ideological opposition, I tend to want more evidence against them before I believe an accusation against them to correct for my own biases. I think all too often we are drawn to immediately leap on anything that makes the political opposition look bad before we actually take a long hard look at the evidence and end up believing in falsehoods that make us look foolish and intellectually dishonest. And I mean this for people across the political aisle.
 
Last edited:
sorry but the concept of innocent until proven guilty is one I support. I also get tired of pretending only one sex is guilty and the other blameless

Then let someone introduce you to science and probabilities extracted.

As to innocent until proven guilty, that is a standard in law which is often mistaken for moral innocence or guilt as you are doing.
 
Interesting. Several of the people that say 'yes' on this poll are arguing vehemently for Kavanaugh to be considered innocent until proven guilty elsewhere on this forum. If this does not document outright tribalism, hypocrisy and moral relativism practiced on DP. I don't know what does.ism
 
Back
Top Bottom