• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Dr. Ford show up on Monday?

Do you think Dr. Ford will show up before the Congressional committee on Friday?


  • Total voters
    26
This administration is playing defense against those who feel the election should be invalidated and the office handed over to Hillary as the rightful heir.

The paranoia in your post is so dense it's in danger of collapsing on itself.
 
The paranoia in your post is so dense it's in danger of collapsing on itself.

so people such as you who engaged in chernobyl level meltdowns over Trump winning are merely opposing this man because of some 36 year old allegations? You all supported him until the Ford nonsense was deployed by one of the worst POSs in the senate?
 
It's entirely her decision...
 
She is demanding Kavanaugh go first. In any form of judicial or administrative history - basically throughout all known human civilization - the accusation and accuser obviously must go first. Otherwise there is nothing to defend against. NEVER does the accused "go first."

No, she isn't the most important person to ever exist in known human history. She's not fully a Goddess yet, only to the Democratic Party.
 
This administration is playing defense against those who feel the election should be invalidated and the office handed over to Hillary as the rightful heir.

Absolutely nothing to do with my post.
 
1. No, she isn't. When you accuse someone else of a crime, you do not then get to dictate the terms on how the government will or will not go about investigating it.

The GOP has absolutely no interest in investigating it.
 
The GOP has absolutely no interest in investigating it.
The GOP delayed a Supreme Court Nomination and is offering her her com choice of venues in order to investigate it. Unfortunately, as of this writing, she is refusing to participate.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
 
no she wont, the dems want to drag this out as long as they can. Its going to backfire dems. This is just anita hill part 2. If I was her Id be looking up the penalty of perjury right about now. Lets face it, shes already in over her head. I cant wait to see how this plays out.
 
This will be settled before 1000 hrs Monday 24SEP18...........
 
Yeah, unfortunately it's becoming no-holds-barred partisanship. But given Trump's and the GOP's actions, there are many Dems that are ascribing to "fight fire with fire". Indies have been drifting away from Trump though, so it's clear what the less partisan's take is - up to this point.

A Kangaroo court seems to be a more relevant description. BTW, I don’t put it past the R’s to keep it going because it is hurting the D’s due to the unfairness of the charges from 30 some odd years ago.
 
A Kangaroo court seems to be a more relevant description. BTW, I don’t put it past the R’s to keep it going because it is hurting the D’s due to the unfairness of the charges from 30 some odd years ago.
Actually though, I don't see the R's wanting this process carried-on, nor do I think it's helping them.
 
Because only Democrats play political games. Everything the GOP does is on the up-and-up, right?

Thanks for confirming that even you believe this is payback for Garland.
 
The GOP delayed a Supreme Court Nomination and is offering her her com choice of venues in order to investigate it. Unfortunately, as of this writing, she is refusing to participate.

Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk

GOP has refused to have FBI investigate just as they investigated the Anita Hill claims. GOP has also refused to subpoena Mark Judge. GOP wants this to go away but they know they are walking a tightrope on this issue.
 
Thanks for confirming that even you believe this is payback for Garland.

What are they called again? Politicians? So for a politician to play politics is not exactly shocking. Were you calling out McConnell and the rest of the GOP for playing politics when they refused to even hold a hearing for Garland?
 
What are they called again? Politicians? So for a politician to play politics is not exactly shocking. Were you calling out McConnell and the rest of the GOP for playing politics when they refused to even hold a hearing for Garland?

No I wasn't. That is because politicians do play politics and, the right were just using the Biden rule. But, the right never made accusations of Garland or tried to smear his character to play partisan politics in order to keep him off the Court. Going this far is just downright disgusting, trying to destroy a person with accusations and no proof just to play partisan politics to further their agenda.

Just a little while ago I read that the Democrat running against Ted Cruz called out protesters for driving Cruz and his wife out of a restaurant. Good for him. It's about time people started telling the far loony left that they are going too far. I'm a moderate and we need to get rid of the loony fringes on both sides. But, since Trump is president, the loony lefties are coming out of the woodwork left and right and they are driving moderates like myself more to the right with their ridiculousness.
 
Last edited:
That is because politicians do play politics and, the right were just using the Biden rule.

And yet they aren't following the Biden Rule now before November midterms. Hypocrisy.
 
Back
Top Bottom