• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If Ford Refuses To Testify, Should Her Claims Be Dismissed In the Kavanaugh Hearings?

If Ford Refuses To Testify, Should Her Claims Be Dismissed In the Kavanaugh Hearings?


  • Total voters
    63
He's actually testified yesterday. Closed session. Staff members. Democrats declined an invitation to attend.

https://therightscoop.com/brett-kav...committee-at-530-but-guess-who-wont-be-there/

So, they have his story. If she doesn't show up to give hers, there's no need to do anything but vote.

Thank you. I wasn't aware of exactly what went down but now that I read it, I do recall hearing today, that Dems pulled their usual b.s. and refused to attend.
Actually, it would be karma if Ford refuses to come and testify, and Dems missed their chance to question Kavanaugh on the record.
 
Would it not discredit Kavanaugh's claim of innocence if he suddenly recanted and refused to testify to his innocence under oath?

Do you consider it odd that Mark Judge refuses to testify?
 
Maybe it's the attorney that wants the 15 minutes of fame.

I'm not going to be able to look at her eyes for that long. I'm telling ya, can't do it!
 
Do you consider it odd that Mark Judge refuses to testify?

About an incident he said he has no recollection of? No.
Far more important is anyone who can corroborate what Ford alleges about Kavanaugh's behavior and character. Thus far, he has only glowing endorsements from the many women he's know personally and professionally.
 
About an incident he said he has no recollection of? No.

All he would need to do is repeat that he has no recollection. Odd that he doesn't want to say this under oath.
 
Republicans sought to stall this nomination?

Citations?

My bad- dumb ass reply on my part.
I was referring to the Republicans rush to confirm the nominee.
 
From the NYT:

Dr. Blasey, thrust suddenly into a spotlight that she never sought, has been inundated with vulgar email and social media messages, and even death threats, according to a person close to her, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private matter. “From what I’ve heard you have 6 months to live, you disgusting slime,” one message said.

Dr. Blasey, who has two teenagers, has moved out of her house, is arranging for private security for herself and her family, and is effectively in hiding, the person said. But Dr. Blasey has also been buoyed by a flood of supportive messages from friends and strangers.

“Ninety percent of people think she’s a hero and are extremely supportive of her, and 10 percent want her to die immediately,” the person said, adding, “Her worst fears are coming true.”
 
My bad- dumb ass reply on my part.
I was referring to the Republicans rush to confirm the nominee.

I'll grant you that. And, I'll grant the legitimacy of the what aboutism...republicans DID do this to Obama.
 
From the NYT:

Dr. Blasey, thrust suddenly into a spotlight that she never sought, has been inundated with vulgar email and social media messages, and even death threats, according to a person close to her, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private matter. “From what I’ve heard you have 6 months to live, you disgusting slime,” one message said.

Dr. Blasey, who has two teenagers, has moved out of her house, is arranging for private security for herself and her family, and is effectively in hiding, the person said. But Dr. Blasey has also been buoyed by a flood of supportive messages from friends and strangers.

I'll say for her what I've consistently said when the other side is doing it - the people sending these threats are scum, and should be prosecuted, and made examples of.
 
I'll grant you that. And, I'll grant the legitimacy of the what aboutism...republicans DID do this to Obama.

And R's would not bring Obama's nominee to the Senate for hearings
We could go down the rabbit hole, but I have no wish to
 
Thank you. I wasn't aware of exactly what went down but now that I read it, I do recall hearing today, that Dems pulled their usual b.s. and refused to attend.
Actually, it would be karma if Ford refuses to come and testify, and Dems missed their chance to question Kavanaugh on the record.

I suspect the Dems, through Ford's attorney, will come up with one excuse after another to try to string the Judicial Committee along as far as they can get it to go. It's all about delaying the vote, after all. But I don't think Grassley will put up with much of that malarkey.
 
I suspect the Dems, through Ford's attorney, will come up with one excuse after another to try to string the Judicial Committee along as far as they can get it to go. It's all about delaying the vote, after all. But I don't think Grassley will put up with much of that malarkey.

As long as some key Senate YEA votes are being withheld, pending hearing of the 'alleged attempted rape' story from its only source, then accepting delay or pulling the nomination are the only options.
 
As long as some key Senate YEA votes are being withheld, pending hearing of the 'alleged attempted rape' story from its only source, then accepting delay or pulling the nomination are the only options.

I really don’t think Graham and Collins will put up for being strung along. Jeff the Political Flake might, but if this vague allegation continues with no new evidence and the accuser refusing testimony people will lose interest fast


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I really don’t think Graham and Collins will put up for being strung along. Jeff the Political Flake might, but if this vague allegation continues with no new evidence and the accuser refusing testimony people will lose interest fast


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We are down to 49 days until the mid-term elections and early voting starts well before that - these politicians know how to play timing games very well. Most would agree to put this off rather than to make a decision w/o letting the 'rape victim' speak her piece.
 
As long as some key Senate YEA votes are being withheld, pending hearing of the 'alleged attempted rape' story from its only source, then accepting delay or pulling the nomination are the only options.

Oh, I see Grassley as being perfectly capable of telling those key Senators to fish or cut bait. After all, we are talking about the committee vote at this point. Whichever way it goes, it will then go to the full Senate.
 
I really don’t think Graham and Collins will put up for being strung along. Jeff the Political Flake might, but if this vague allegation continues with no new evidence and the accuser refusing testimony people will lose interest fast


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She's going to be tossed into the "useful idiot" heap at some point, but if she refuses to come and testify, or throws up unreasonable roadblocks (like trying to get her allegations formally investigated by authorities-sorry, you waited way, way, way too long) in an obvious attempt to delay, she'll be yesterday's news.
 
I don't recall Ford volunteering to be part of TV covered event, bringing back memories of the disgusting and vile way Anita Hill was treated 27 years ago. The GOP has galvanized around their guy, and the only acceptable outcome for them is to tear her limb from limb.

If there was any indication that there would be a fair hearing held, I think she'd show up.

She volunteered to be the next Anita hill, I for one don't buy her story and think this is just political gamesmanship of the worst kind. I think she's a liar.
 
Back
Top Bottom