• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

  • YES

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • OTHER

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NOT SURE

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    14

Checkerboard Strangler

Make Video Horizontal Again
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
69,195
Reaction score
53,533
Location
Los Angeles
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

Recently President Trump said that "flipping almost ought to be illegal".
If Donald Trump finally comes out and says something to the effect of:
"The law should be whatever I say it is.", will you defend such a statement?
 
Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

Recently President Trump said that "flipping almost ought to be illegal".
If Donald Trump finally comes out and says something to the effect of:
"The law should be whatever I say it is.", will you defend such a statement?
Sure.

But only if I am afforded the same right and my decision carries the greater weight. :mrgreen:
 
I posted this POLL, with its over the top question because I'm trying to gauge just how far some supporters would go to defend him if it turned out that he's liable for the consequences of some of his actions, and some of the things he's been saying.

It's a lame poll on purpose, I want to know if anyone out there actually believes that the law is whatever Trump says, "as he speaks it out of his mouth", as in "rule by decree".

After all, flipping in order to testify against someone is as old as common law itself but Trump seems to feel that exceptions should be made just for him and that there should be a separate set of laws that apply to him and him only.

So, just how far does that go?
 
I posted this POLL, with its over the top question because I'm trying to gauge just how far some supporters would go to defend him if it turned out that he's liable for the consequences of some of his actions, and some of the things he's been saying.

It's a lame poll on purpose, I want to know if anyone out there actually believes that the law is whatever Trump says, "as he speaks it out of his mouth", as in "rule by decree".

After all, flipping in order to testify against someone is as old as common law itself but Trump seems to feel that exceptions should be made just for him and that there should be a separate set of laws that apply to him and him only.

So, just how far does that go?

Seems more like an effort to encourage DimWits to identify themselves.

I approve!
 
I posted this POLL, with its over the top question because I'm trying to gauge just how far some supporters would go to defend him if it turned out that he's liable for the consequences of some of his actions, and some of the things he's been saying.

It's a lame poll on purpose, I want to know if anyone out there actually believes that the law is whatever Trump says, "as he speaks it out of his mouth", as in "rule by decree".

After all, flipping in order to testify against someone is as old as common law itself but Trump seems to feel that exceptions should be made just for him and that there should be a separate set of laws that apply to him and him only.

So, just how far does that go?

Trump wants to free organized crime from the shackles of the law. I wonder why?
 
Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

Recently President Trump said that "flipping almost ought to be illegal".
If Donald Trump finally comes out and says something to the effect of:
"The law should be whatever I say it is.", will you defend such a statement?

719169bea5dfd2dd349b9c5b792f1660--republican-party-republican-nominee.jpg
 
Is Donald Trump the true source of the law?

Recently President Trump said that "flipping almost ought to be illegal".
If Donald Trump finally comes out and says something to the effect of:
"The law should be whatever I say it is.", will you defend such a statement?

We are so used to poll tested, canned responses, we freak out when a president shoots his lip from the hip.

But those who speak in the poll tested answers, have no iintention of actually doing anything, they are just dope for the masses.
 
Good grief, no! This is someone who thinks laws do not apply to him. It's probably time Trump faced the consequences.
 
So okay it's pretty obvious that almost no one is going to say YES, and I didn't expect that anyone would.
But just in case...

Stay tuned for another more carefully defined POLL which gets a lot more specific.
Far as I'm concerned this one already served its purpose, although one never knows what tomorrow may bring.
Giuliani is saying the world will pretty much explode in all out pandemonium, Trump is saying that the markets will collapse, and somewhere out there, an abusive husband is screaming "You'd be NOTHING without ME!!" to a battered wife cowering in a corner.

Seems there's quite a few battered wives of the political kind.
 
I posted this POLL, with its over the top question because I'm trying to gauge just how far some supporters would go to defend him if it turned out that he's liable for the consequences of some of his actions, and some of the things he's been saying.

It's a lame poll on purpose, I want to know if anyone out there actually believes that the law is whatever Trump says, "as he speaks it out of his mouth", as in "rule by decree".

After all, flipping in order to testify against someone is as old as common law itself but Trump seems to feel that exceptions should be made just for him and that there should be a separate set of laws that apply to him and him only.

So, just how far does that go?
You can see that the delusion is hardly unique, in view of how I clearly share it.:lol:

But also see the more serious angle in my having addressed the issue as delusional.;)
 
So okay it's pretty obvious that almost no one is going to say YES, and I didn't expect that anyone would.
But just in case...

Stay tuned for another more carefully defined POLL which gets a lot more specific.
Far as I'm concerned this one already served its purpose, although one never knows what tomorrow may bring.
Giuliani is saying the world will pretty much explode in all out pandemonium, Trump is saying that the markets will collapse, and somewhere out there, an abusive husband is screaming "You'd be NOTHING without ME!!" to a battered wife cowering in a corner.

Seems there's quite a few battered wives of the political kind.

Surprisingly, all their names end with an R.
 
Coming up next: correction of the misspeak in that the reference of flipping (should be illegal) was supposed to apply to burgers. :lamo
 
You're missing a poll answer option: Oh, HELL NO!!!

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom