Red:
No.
Aside from Beat Haldimann's "metaphorical clocks" (watches really) that measure but don't report time, a clock that continuously displays (reports) a time of day and that isn't otherwise functioning ("ticking," if you will) will, twice each day display the correct time. To wit, twice within each 24 hour period it is 10:10. Or if one prefers, the times of 14:10 and 10:10 each occur once in each 24 hour period, thus twice each day the clock displays the correct time,
i.e., "is right."
Off Topic:
Strictly in horological terms, a watch is a device that measures time, but reporting of the time measured is not a requirement. Beat Haldimann made two watches that play on that idea. (I get the idea and I think the device is handsome. I even think it cheerfully novel in an artsy way, so the idea of it isn't lost on me. That said, I'm not about to buy a watch that doesn't report time. LOL )
And, no, I'm not particularly interested in watches, but my best friend is, so I've picked up a good deal about watches as a result of having listened to him gush over "this or that" watch and from occasionally joining him at various watch events and/or stores. As for BH, well, I wouldn't rule out buying one if the time, need and occasion comes about for me to do so. They make lovely timepieces. I don't imagine, however, that I'll ever have a need to do so. I'm a watch user, not a watch collector.
There's been some significant flaming and baiting in this thread. It stops now. The next poster to attack fellow posters and not address the topic will receive consequences. That's all. 
