• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are Liberals Arrogant/Self Righteous?

Are Liberals Smug?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 56.0%
  • No

    Votes: 11 44.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Wanna elaborate on that?

I will tonight. I have to run to WORK. I will start though by citing the desire for taxpayer funded healthcare. Let's not forget the men that were NOT charged with a crime being disciplined for sexual assault on campus. I will even start a new thread!
 
I'm explaining no one should be allowed to civicly behave like that ma'am it should be enforced and legislated accordingly. Well it does, because I'm trying to explain that I don't want condescending and arrogant conversatives to behave that way either... I 100% agree with you that it is a universal across the board problem :/

Claiming you want civility enforced is rather uncivil way to deal with the problem
Do you want people jailed or just fined if they are not civil? Define civil
 
Claiming you want civility enforced is rather uncivil way to deal with the problem
Do you want people jailed or just fined if they are not civil? Define civil

Japan has laws against bad etiquette, bad manner and there system/society to me is a great example of a utopia... If you have a problem you are too entitled "muh free speech" imo.
 
Japan has laws against bad etiquette, bad manner and there system/society to me is a great example of a utopia... If you have a problem you are too entitled "muh free speech" imo.
Define civil
 
Why shouldn't civility and courteousy be enforced by law huh? It should be a very important thing to enforce no? I'm a centrist fascist essentially but that is just my opinion and I conform to the rules and T&C of this website. I accordingly listen to peoples views/opinions and respond appropriately to what I think should happen. "Democracy" and "freedom" allow for the existence of fascists and maybe I'm just trying to prove the faults/flaws in the logic with "democracy" arguement essentially.

Who gets to decide what is civil speech and what is not? Who gets to enforce those laws? A liberal administration and/or liberal Supreme Court might see it one way and a conservative administration and/or Supreme Court might see it differently. There is a reason our speech restrictions are so minimal. Be careful what you wish for.
 
The above is what happens when schools give out participation trophies.

The above is what happens when someone is never taught the concept of sarcasm.
 

I consider liberals to be the far left so I voted yes even though, of course, not all liberals are. But, when it comes to the far right you could ask the very same question. We need to ditch both the far left and the far right and send them to some island where they can live in their own eternal hell instead of bringing it to the rest of us.
 
My problem with Liberalism is that it’s more concerned with policing people’s language and thoughts without requiring them to do anything to fix the problem. White liberal college students speak of “safe spaces”, “trigger words”, “micro aggressions” and “white privilege” while not having to do anything or, more importantly, give up anything. They can’t even have a conversation with someone who sees the world differently without resorting to calling someone a racist, homophobic, misogynistic, bigot and trying to have them banned from campus, or ruin them and their reputation.

Well the article is essentially a black women complaining about white people but she does have a point.... I call these ^^^^ Prviwhits... priviledged whites. They are unable to discuss any issues without jumping onto twitter and yelling RACISM in all 140 characters or whatever number they tweet in currently.

She is talking about equality and morally doing the right thing and as fas as I'm concerned that is the problem we have today in our society. We are told to morally do the right thing... ie. let refugees into the country, but all practical concerns are ignored and if you point these out you're considered some immoral hatefull rightwinger. This behaviour needs to change or we are going to solve nothing.

There are simply too many people misplaced in the world to take them all in and many of these people also pose a danger to our societies, they need to be carefully screened. I am all for helping people but we must stop yelling abuse when someone point out their concerns.

Now the problem with conservatives are that instead of focussing on the issues, they play exactly into liberal hands and voice racist and discriminative remarks, and there should never be a place for this in our societies. Conservatives need to learn how to express themselves without being racist, misogynistic or discriminate, and if they can't do that they deserve every tweet coming their way.

... bow.... off my soapbox now :lol:
 
Who gets to decide what is civil speech and what is not? Who gets to enforce those laws? A liberal administration and/or liberal Supreme Court might see it one way and a conservative administration and/or Supreme Court might see it differently. There is a reason our speech restrictions are so minimal. Be careful what you wish for.

America is not the world bro... What about everyone else huh?
 
I consider liberals to be the far left so I voted yes even though, of course, not all liberals are. But, when it comes to the far right you could ask the very same question. We need to ditch both the far left and the far right and send them to some island where they can live in their own eternal hell instead of bringing it to the rest of us.

That's precisely what I have been trying to say this whole time....
 
No, not in that terminology at the least and it's not all liberals as well.

I would just narrow it down to them being almost completely ignorant of reality.
 
You are as incoherent as you are weird.

You are a non-sequitur also you are illogical as was I (in that singular quote). Also nice, personal insults brother makes your position seem ever more logical... Now how about you get a brain and have intellectually thought out individual/independent views without any political affiliations or connections... Or can't you handle that because you would be lonely? ;(
 
Should there not be a law patented where everyone has to only logically, rationally and factually discuss things (particularly in the media) or be fined like $50 for like Civil disordenance/ Spreading disinformation or some such law?

Stuff like that has already started in Canada if one can take current trends in their social policing seriously.
 
No, not in that terminology at the least and it's not all liberals as well.

I would just narrow it down to them being almost completely ignorant of reality.

And what's funny is they try to make us conservatives or any other right-leaning person look stupid.
 
Stuff like that has already started in Canada if one can take current trends in their social policing seriously.

It's a better reality in Japan though they have a more centre right or something government today. I think slightly fluctuating dependent on who gets elected... Th political parties that get elected are usually politically objective and logical "moderate left" "moderate right" and thankfully the conservatives believe in what they believe in from pure policy, facts, science and logic. Not the bull**** (theological nonsense)
"The bible says this and Jesus our lord" Seriously stfu you are accomplishing/achieving nothing...
 
Last edited:
And what's funny is they try to make us conservatives or any other right-leaning person look stupid.

As a former democrat, I can tell you that the current attempts of the left to make anyone on the right look like anything. Would be to make them look like Nazis, racist, fascist and any variation of the same pejoratives. The hard left-liberals have been trying to dehumanize those on the right for a long time now.
 
Arrogance? Given that the only defense for their political views is a variant of "wow just wow" and "it's (the current year)", yes.

Liberals are essentially dupes who do the will of the big business they purport to oppose. Why else would they crap all over white working class people from their Macbooks?

Sent from my HTC phone. Instaurare omnia in Christo.
 
America is not the world bro... What about everyone else huh?

Well, bro... I'm in favor of free speech for the entire world if that's what you're asking. I believe everyone should be able to speak their mind, no matter how it might offend me. Without free speech there is no such thing as democracy.
 
You are a non-sequitur also you are illogical as was I (in that singular quote). Also nice, personal insults brother makes your position seem ever more logical... Now how about you get a brain and have intellectually thought out individual/independent views without any political affiliations or connections... Or can't you handle that because you would be lonely? ;(

It's like you're trying to communicate but it's just too stupid to comprehend.
 
Centristfascist; You are a non-sequitur also you are illogical as was I (in that singular quote). Also nice, personal insults brother makes your position seem ever more logical... Now how about you get a brain and have intellectually thought out individual/independent views without any political affiliations or connections... Or can't you handle that because you would be lonely?

Isn't this an example of the type of speech you want outlawed?
 
I believe we should all be forceably re-educated and neurologically corrected (myself included in the process). But thats the only logical thing to do.

Neurologically corrected? What's that?
 
Back
Top Bottom