• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide whether or not to use birth control pills?

Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth co


  • Total voters
    132

Risky Thicket

Sewer Rat
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
34,076
Reaction score
37,460
Location
With Yo Mama
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?
 
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?

"Additional concerns being expressed" does not in any way mean they are actually credible concerns.

This is ludicrous, paranoid nonsense.
 
Oh FFS:doh

Yeah, with the Kavanaugh appointment and a possible Ginsburg replacement in the not too distant future I foresee women's right to vote being repealed, mandatory pregnancy and a ban on women's shoes other than Oxfords. You read it here first!
 
Hah, women wanting to control their own bodies.

What a ridiculous concept.

Next they'll want the vote.
 
I don't think it's a question of 'should' because women already have the right to use birth control. Birth control and abortion are a long standing protected right. If anyone tries to take it away there will be hell to pay.
 
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?
Yes.

Anything else is a violation of their freedom.
 
Oh FFS:doh

Yeah, with the Kavanaugh appointment and a possible Ginsburg replacement in the not too distant future I foresee women's right to vote being repealed, mandatory pregnancy and a ban on women's shoes other than Oxfords. You read it here first!

So your answer is Yes?
 
Hah, women wanting to control their own bodies.

What a ridiculous concept.

Next they'll want the vote.

Or they might want to be elected to office or even POTUS!
 
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?

Where's the "Oh HELL Yes!" option?
 
So your answer is Yes?

As goPCs would say, tell the woman to pinch the aspirin between her knees. RvW is too valuable of an election issue for the gop base for their judges to ever overturn it, FEDERALLY. Expect more restrictions, as per Kennedy in 1992.
 
And the hyperventilating, nonsensical, mouth-frothing continues. Sigh. No one wants to take your birth control away, people. Have a Snickers.
 
And the hyperventilating, nonsensical, mouth-frothing continues. Sigh. No one wants to take your birth control away, people. Have a Snickers.

My impression is that the "right to privacy" was spoken of in the Griswald decision on birth control, which led to the Roe v Wade decision. Doubt if either decision will be overturned.
 
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?
I voted yes, although this is the most idiotic poll I've ever seen.
 
Oh FFS:doh

Yeah, with the Kavanaugh appointment and a possible Ginsburg replacement in the not too distant future I foresee women's right to vote being repealed, mandatory pregnancy and a ban on women's shoes other than Oxfords. You read it here first!
And kiss equal pay for women goodbye, too. Maybe even driving. :shock:
 
And the hyperventilating, nonsensical, mouth-frothing continues. Sigh. No one wants to take your birth control away, people. Have a Snickers.

Bull****ing****.
 
And the hyperventilating, nonsensical, mouth-frothing continues. Sigh. No one wants to take your birth control away, people. Have a Snickers.

So that's a Yes vote for you, Josie?
 
Oh FFS:doh

Yeah, with the Kavanaugh appointment and a possible Ginsburg replacement in the not too distant future I foresee women's right to vote being repealed, mandatory pregnancy and a ban on women's shoes other than Oxfords. You read it here first!

I foresee all of that AND....

Dresses are mandatory. All women's jeans, pants and shorts will be burned in community bonfires across the nation.
Showing cleavage will get you whipped with straps made from porcupine quills.
Wearing any form of makeup will be an automatic death sentence -- burned at the stake. We women and our precious Orgasm blush and Better Than Sex mascara will die a torturous, scorching death.
 
As the nation may well face the reversal of Roe v. Wade additional concerns are being expressed, one is birth control. Frankly I hadn't thought about it but I suppose it is a logical concern. Is it a logical concern?

The question then is: Should women have the right, as they do now, to decide for themselves whether or not to use birth control pills?

I dont understand the reason the question is even a question.

Can you explain?
 
Bull****ing****.

What lawmaker or judge wants to take away the right women have to birth control? Provide names and direct quotes in context, please.
 
What lawmaker or judge wants to take away the right women have to birth control? Provide names and direct quotes in context, please.

How can you be so ill informed?
 
Back
Top Bottom