• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should supreme court nominees have to recuse themselves from issues involving Trump?

Should supreme court nominees have to recuse themselves from issues involving Trump?


  • Total voters
    38
On the contrary, reasonable suspicion is fundamental to our judicial system.
Not until indicted, no. You can't demand recusals, constitutional restrictions and make accusations of predetermined bias on suspicion. Burdens of proof are required.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
On the contrary, reasonable suspicion is fundamental to our judicial system.

reasonable has been in very short supply in the TDS fueled nonsense of late
 
Back
Top Bottom