• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For those on the right ---- Do you want Trump to be a dictator?

Do you want Trump to be a dictator?


  • Total voters
    39
If Hillary was leading calls to lock her electoral opponent up for a crime they had been cleared of, I would be criticising her.

Well gee, that is precisely what appears to have happened in 2016 when her oppo research wound up before the Obama justice department. Thanks for playing.
 
If Hillary was leading calls to lock her electoral opponent up for a crime they had been cleared of, I would be criticising her.

What crime are you talking about? Hillary failed at Secretary of State! I don’t really understand why you are “dismissing” Hillary and, making her look like she was at home out of politics which is difficult for her!


Can’t censor this Patriot
 
If Hillary was leading calls to lock her electoral opponent up for a crime they had been cleared of, I would be criticising her.

What crime are you talking about? Hillary failed at Secretary of State! I don’t really understand why you are “dismissing” Hillary and, making her look like she was at home out of politics which is difficult for her! Geez I wonder if Hillary had any time to read the oppo research on the Republican candidate? Folks, this is my view on election crime because Aristaeusc and, jmotivator mention it. Hillary is a weak candidate and, she had a oppo research apparently to get her win. Which turned out well, you already know that answer. One more thing this whole Russian case has been pathetic because I have said it multiple times and I’m saying it again in different context. If Russia was trying to get involved with the election would you think that the national security administration would be up in this mess? Not the Federal Bureau Of Investigation?


Can’t censor this Patriot
 
Well gee, that is precisely what appears to have happened in 2016 when her oppo research wound up before the Obama justice department. Thanks for playing.

If you are cleared of a crime, that means you didn't do it in the eyes of the law.
 
If you are cleared of a crime, that means you didn't do it in the eyes of the law.

Democrats are not capable to comprehend


Can’t censor this Patriot
 
I first want to make one thing very clear - I did not accuse you of anything. If you re-read where I talk about being a patsy, you will see the accusation was conditional. Since I do not know what you truly believe, I would no accuse you of that.

Also, I left something out. I should have that if small govt is a foundational principle for you AND you support these republicans, THEN you are being played like a patsy. You may not know it, but that is what it is.

Now, I do not know what you believe, or who you support, so I cannot say what you are. However, it is not my perception that the right, as a whole, claims to be for small govt while taking actions that are in direct conflict with their claimed principle. That is reality

We are just sharing ideas on the internet. I am not all that worried about being called a patsy - I understand why you would reach such a conclusion. Between you and me, I have been called worse. I can only attest to you that I am not one - I make conscious decisions every day about my course of action and I accept the subsequent consequences. We are, however, stuck in a two party political system. The vast majority of candidates that win are either an R or a D, and I dislike the D far more than I love the R (the R is the lesser of two evils, to turn a phrase). Compromise is the only true game in politics, many (not just you) would call it a lack of principles.

As I previously stated - I believe that politics and the art of compromise creates a perception that conservatives have no principles. It would seem that you don't buy my reasoning. Fair enough, there is room for both of our opinions on this planet.
 
One of the most common conceptual errors by Americans is their confusion between the goals of natural rights, as opposed to those "process rights" used to obtain those ends. Democracy is only a means to an end, to secure those natural rights owned by all men and women. As such, democracy supplies a "process right" to vote, for example, as a means to that end. When a government, of any type, no longer serves that end, and uses its powers to steal and tyrannize its members, democracy is an enemy of liberty...not a protector. And without liberty rights, a dictator of one person, an oligarchy, an institution, a bureaucracy or 51% of the people, is still a dictatorship over things which are none of its business.

The list of failed institutions and repressive structures under the American "democracy" should be enough to convince a person that the Republic has failed: the IRS harassment, the EPA, the malicious prosecution against political enemies, the politically motivated judges, the looming fiscal and entitlement crisis, lawfare, the seizure of private property for private gain, restrictions on freedom contract and employment, removal of property rights through land use and zoning laws, etc.

Nope, in my humble view, its time for a good dictator - someone who will wipe the slate clean and create a path back towards liberty.

So are you describing a scenario similar to post revolution times when Washington was the president before the constitution was ratified? In your terminology Washington was a dictator?
 
So are you describing a scenario similar to post revolution times when Washington was the president before the constitution was ratified? In your terminology Washington was a dictator?

Reputedly his popularity was such that he might have made himself such - however, I have no particular or informed opinion that he was.
 
Back
Top Bottom