• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The President between 2019 and 2021

President too after next election ??

  • MAGA / DJ / Current President

    Votes: 8 80.0%
  • Paul Ryan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • John Kasich

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Ben Carson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mike Pence

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
You mean since November 2016? Because it sure worked for Trump. With his middle-school insults and bullying he vanquished several high-level GOP politicians, and then Hillary Clinton thereafter.

For all our sakes, I hope you are correct.

I mean, let's keep it real, the bulk of Clinton's own efforts were chiefly reducible to attacks on Trump, and rarely emphasized substantive policy; something that cost her deeply in the rust belt/'Blue Wall', which were consequently left vulnerable to Trump's economic populism. They were both ****, unpopular candidates with **** negative campaigning. Moreover, even now, people, including our own focus groups, assert that the party stands for nothing but opposition to the guy:

ABC News: Majority of Americans Say Democrats Stand For Nothing Except Being Against Trump - Conservative Nation

https://www.axios.com/midterm-migra...813-bff84c4c-4e3c-4f46-a63b-84db98847614.html


What worked for Trump was not negative campaigning so much as the general weakness of his opponent and her own deleterious over-reliance on negative campaigning, among other missteps.
 
Back
Top Bottom