• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who do you trust more Nunes or Schiff?

who do you trust more?

  • Nunes

    Votes: 4 8.3%
  • Schiff

    Votes: 30 62.5%
  • Neither

    Votes: 11 22.9%
  • Ronald McDonald

    Votes: 3 6.3%

  • Total voters
    48
Let's hope the voting public sees things the same way as the forum does, come 2018!
 
Schiff has demonstrated complete honesty for the pst year. He should run for President and I would enthusiastically vote for him.

I definitely saw him using this mess as a catalyst early on. I was surprised by him, and thought he sounded like presidential material. Unlike the troll in the WH.
 
Went to get a warrant with "evidence" they knew was false. That being the made-up dossier.

Didn't tell the court who paid for the "evidence' the warrant would be based on. That being the DNC.

They should all be doing the perp walk.

Talked and texted openly of hating Trump and blocking his presidency. Changed the wording on the Hillary email report to a non-criminal description.

They should all be doing the perp walk.

The mistake they made was being so transparent about it all. They figured with Hillary in the White House nothing would ever be turned up anyway. They guessed wrong.
 
Went to get a warrant with "evidence" they knew was false. That being the made-up dossier.

Didn't tell the court who paid for the "evidence' the warrant would be based on. That being the DNC.

They should all be doing the perp walk.

Talked and texted openly of hating Trump and blocking his presidency. Changed the wording on the Hillary email report to a non-criminal description.

They should all be doing the perp walk.

The mistake they made was being so transparent about it all. They figured with Hillary in the White House nothing would ever be turned up anyway. They guessed wrong.

The dossier wasn't made-up; the evidence wasn't false; and they had FISA warrants on Page for three years. You're ignoring facts in favor of your idiotic narrative that Chairman Marmalard has crammed down your throat.

You have no idea what you're talking about. You have no understanding of the issues surrounding the memo (or even what it brought up). You are woefully unable to participate in this conversation.
 
It's not about trust. It's about facts. Facts show the FISA court was presented with falsified evidence (dossier) and who paid for that evidence (DNC) was not told to the court. You don't have to "trust" anybody; just read the evidence for yourself.
 
The dossier wasn't made-up; the evidence wasn't false; and they had FISA warrants on Page for three years. You're ignoring facts in favor of your idiotic narrative that Chairman Marmalard has crammed down your throat.

You have no idea what you're talking about. You have no understanding of the issues surrounding the memo (or even what it brought up). You are woefully unable to participate in this conversation.

LMAO...You don't know what you're talking about, but then again you never do. Go on back to your DNC handlers for more and better instructions. Get back to me when you know the facts.
 
LMAO...You don't know what you're talking about, but then again you never do. Go on back to your DNC handlers for more and better instructions. Get back to me when you know the facts.

Apparently the "facts" are whatever Sean Hannity tells you they are.
 
Apparently the "facts" are whatever Sean Hannity tells you they are.

You keep talking but you ain't sayin' nothin'. Is that how it always is with you? Do some research, dig out some facts, present a cogent argument. It isn't rocket science. You have evidence Trump broke a law? Put it up here. We'd all like to see it. Until then the man is presumed innocent, just like any other citizen.

BTW; here's a clue; if Comey or Mueller, or any Democrat operative had any dirt on Trump it would have been leaked months ago. Something that serious wouldn't be a secret for long....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom