• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are the Religious Right Hypocrites?

Are the Religious Right Hypocrites?


  • Total voters
    42

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
 
Religious people are no more hypocrites than either the far left or far right. They all have a right to their views and to be heard without some nut case calling them hypocrites.
 
For supporting Trump, yes, I think so. But, Christians just vote for someone who they think is going to protect their interests. Same as anyone else.

I mean to break it down into a scorecard..

A vote for Trump is a -10 on the Christian morals card..

but, you also get Pence which might be a +12.

So, you come out with a +2 score on your Christian voter spread.
 
Evangelicals in the southern Bible Belt constitute a good portion of Trumps base.

How supposed devout Christians can support a sexual predator, adulterer, and habitual liar is beyond me.

Political agenda apparently trumps the Ten Commandments. (pun intended)
 
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74
Definitely!

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Religious people are no more hypocrites than either the far left or far right. They all have a right to their views and to be heard without some nut case calling them hypocrites.

If they are hypocrites as defined by the English language then it is perfectly fair to call them hypocrites.

M-W:
Definition of hypocrite
1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
 
Religious people are no more hypocrites than either the far left or far right.

Religious people usually are the far right, often times the farthest possible distance one might travel down the political spectrum.
 
All extremists are hypocrites regardless of whether they fall on the left or the right.
 
Evangelicals in the southern Bible Belt constitute a good portion of Trumps base.

How supposed devout Christians can support a sexual predator, adulterer, and habitual liar is beyond me.

Political agenda apparently trumps the Ten Commandments. (pun intended)

They give people like this Christian the willies - reason why I never listen to them. They have been corrupted by power and money.
 
No but they sold their souls to Baal.

To rally behind a man who would put the residents of Sodom and Gomorrah to shame indicates they no longer follow the believes they say they do
 
Everyone in this thread:

492.png
 
For supporting Trump, yes, I think so. But, Christians just vote for someone who they think is going to protect their interests. Same as anyone else.

I mean to break it down into a scorecard..

A vote for Trump is a -10 on the Christian morals card..

but, you also get Pence which might be a +12.

So, you come out with a +2 score on your Christian voter spread.

People are so quick to judge others without even thinking objectively about a situation. Those that defend' s Trump moral character, or blasted Clinton for his indiscretions but are silent on Trump are absolutely hypocrites. However, many that support Trump do so despite his lack of morals or intelligence because he supports their policies.

To put this into perspective, currently we have the #metoo movement going on about sexual harassment and men in positions of power who used their positions for sex. Does anyone believe Democrats outraged over people like Weinstein would support Pence over a JFK or Bill Clinton? No, and it would be rather ridiculous of them to do so because they likely don't support most of the policies he would run on.
 
They pretty much always have been hypocrites. I never went along with the woman submit to the husband or whatever the expression conservative Christians use. No, we should be equal in every way!
 
Certainly no more so than the religious Left.









Or indeed almost any political group one cares to name.
 
They are not religious in the sense of being righteous. They are religious in that it provides them a path to things they want. Judges who are anti gay, anti abortion. They are like Trump in that they are "transactional". They will sell this to get that. Apparently their "soul" is available... for a price.
 
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74

I've believed for many years the Religious Right was nothing more than a passel of hypocrites. Remember, I grew up strongly conservative, and most of my youth was as a Southern Baptist, so I got plenty of their rhetoric force-fed to me. But I think the first time that I began to really question what they were peddling was with Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker of the PTL Club. Where I grew up, we had one - count 'em, ONE - television station (WABG), and not only was the PTL Club on five times a week, but when it came to prime-time programming, one week out of every month without exception was devoted to the Billy Graham Crusade (who IMO would be ashamed at how his son has become a Trumpista).

Anyway, I saw Jim Bakker for the smarmy-faced liar he was right away...but my grandmother couldn't, and she sent money to him. I couldn't say anything (she was bipolar (I think)and woe be unto anyone who rebuked her), and was not at all surprised when he was jailed for massive fraud...I never mentioned it to her - wouldn't have done any good. But now Jim Bakker's out there again, claim's he's repented (my ASS he has!), and he and Pat Robertson and all the other Religious Right loonies are still driving the GOP and conservatism to Crazy Town at ludicrous speed, nay, at PLAID.

But as much as I liked Bush 41 (especially for not taking us to Baghdad (if only his son had listened)), I saw where the GOP was headed between the Religious Right and the pundits like Rush Limbaugh - they were all kingmakers for the GOP - no Republican politician dare question them or disagree with them, for with but a word any of them could end that politician's career. And I was right - ever since then, the GOP's been a circular firing squad powered by Fox, a never-ending game of I'm-more-conservative-than-the-next-guy, and it's led the GOP so far right that either Bush 43 or Reagan himself would be dismissed by the GOP rank-and-file as loony liberals...and Eisenhower would be tarred-and-feathered as an outright socialist.

So back to the Religious Right - they ARE hypocrites in every sense of the word. They ignore outright the teachings of Jesus beyond that which they want to hear.

What's saddest of all is that the overwhelming majority of today's conservatives are good, honest, well-meaning people with no malice in their hearts towards anyone...but they're being led by the Religious Right to support policies that are anathema to real Christianity, and to support as president a political demagogue who embodies much of what Jesus and His apostles preached against. It's a grand-scale exercise in mob mentality, and I shudder to think where it's going to lead.
 
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74

When evangelicals support a president who uses violent, profane language (this is not a minor deal with them), treats immigrants poorly in clear defiance of how the Bible commands Christians to treat them, can't even identify a Bible book other than "Two Corinthians," deliberately excuse Donald's deplorable behavior, not to mention their wanting to maintain a form of a religion that stands in complete defiance to the Beatitudes, yes. They are hypocrites.
 
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74

Some are, some aren't.
Hypocritical on a personal level, I mean.
But since the ones who are don't often get held to account for their hypocrisy, the whole of them are hypocritical, or at least all who make the news.
 
People are so quick to judge others without even thinking objectively about a situation. Those that defend' s Trump moral character, or blasted Clinton for his indiscretions but are silent on Trump are absolutely hypocrites. However, many that support Trump do so despite his lack of morals or intelligence because he supports their policies.

To put this into perspective, currently we have the #metoo movement going on about sexual harassment and men in positions of power who used their positions for sex. Does anyone believe Democrats outraged over people like Weinstein would support Pence over a JFK or Bill Clinton? No, and it would be rather ridiculous of them to do so because they likely don't support most of the policies he would run on.

Yeah, conservatives tend to hold the party line, stronger than Dems do though. If the Dem candidate was a rapist, I contend more Dems would abstain from voting for the rapist, than conservatives would if their candidate were in the same boat. Would they ever vote for the other side? Likely no. they would vote 3rd party or write in. Whereas more conservatives would go ahead and vote the rapist into office. Just guesswork on my part, not trying to get into a huge argument. Just because Conservatives hold the party line, because in my opinion, it is part of their attributes of their personality to conform, rather than rebel. Even if that means supporting a rapist.
 
What politician can meet up to the standards for a Christian's vote...no one...they are all crooked as a barrel of fishhooks...
 
a never-ending game of I'm-more-conservative-than-the-next-guy

Easily the best description of the current GOP I've ever seen of course your analysis of how it got there is great as well. I just had to highlight this phrase, although I wonder how hard it's going to be for them to find another Trump. He's really good at being a hypocrite, just like them. I saw it coming too back when (though this was only like three years ago) I used to listen to a lot of right wing radio, and I got annoyed at them. Who cares how conservative the guy is, does he represent my values and does he have policy plans that I like? Or can he convince me that those policies are needed/good. If yes, I vote for him, if not I don't.
 
The religious who championed Trump and helped him win the nomination are absolutely hypocrites.

Those who cry, "But what would Jesus do???" when they want a piece of legislation passed, but say there should be no religion in government are also absolutely hypocrites.

In short, there are hypocrites on both sides --- all of the time.
 
In my view the biggest hypocrites to come out of the 2016 election are the religious right, who are still standing by their top guy after having an affair with a porn star and all the sexist/racist comments that he's made!!!! I think it's pretty immoral to suggest that getting a BJ from an intern in the WH is immoral but NOT sleeping with a porn star. :lamo

https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/politics/tony-perkins-trump-affairs-mulligan/index.html

Pat Robertson once called President Clinton: a “debauched, debased and defamed” leader. Yet he's proud of Trump??

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-daniels-affair/?utm_term=.509e35428d74

Yep: Michael Steele Calls out Trump Slobbering Evangelicals
 
Yeah, conservatives tend to hold the party line, stronger than Dems do though. If the Dem candidate was a rapist, I contend more Dems would abstain from voting for the rapist, than conservatives would if their candidate were in the same boat. Would they ever vote for the other side? Likely no. they would vote 3rd party or write in. Whereas more conservatives would go ahead and vote the rapist into office. Just guesswork on my part, not trying to get into a huge argument. Just because Conservatives hold the party line, because in my opinion, it is part of their attributes of their personality to conform, rather than rebel. Even if that means supporting a rapist.

You do realize Roy Moore lost to a Democrat in Alabama simply because he allegedly sexually assaulted an underage girl, if he were accused of rape do you believe he would have recieved more or less votes?. While there were some that didn't care, most were in denial that the allegations were even true. Harvey Milk was living with his underage lover and is considered to be a hero to some on the Left.
 
Back
Top Bottom