• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

metric vs standard

metric vs standard

  • standard

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • metric

    Votes: 20 66.7%
  • british standard

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • I measure cow hooves to three shades of the wind

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    30
Us standard is us customary which is 75% identical to british standard, british do things a little different though, A mile inch and pound are the same but a british gallon is more than an american one, as is a british pint.

Yeah, we have Imperial gallons here, 160 ounces, when we use gallons. I buy marked gas in a five-gallon jerry can and pay for it by the litre. Then I use metric to mix it 50-1 for my saw and put chalk marks by inches on the logs I'm bucking for firewood.
It's kind of messed up but it works.
 
It's much more convenient to say move that bad boy a 1/4 mil instead of saying 10 thousandths. Also, pointing to an error of a few microns sounds much better than saying it's off by 1.2 ten-thousandths of an inch.
 
Our math program teaches metric only....... in a country that uses mostly standard measurements. :roll:
 
Base ten is best obviously.

Literally no reason for clinging to the arbitrary mess that is imperial other than blind traditional fidelity/intransigence or an inability/refusal to learn (and of course in the States, the fact that you're largely press ganged into doing so). Granted, it's become so entrenched in the States that I'm sure there'd be a considerable cost to switching standards.
 
Last edited:
It honestly doesn't matter. What labels you slap on something doesn't change anything about it.
 
I did a thread a long time ago about the british returning to standard as they are currently mixed. This thread however is about standard vs metric, Myself I prefer standard, it is human oriented and even european countries in one way or another defy metric during construction.

Now my sig says it all, my car gets 40 rods to the hogshead, which I forget the conversion but it is absolutely horrible mpg, something like 3 mpg. keep in mind rod and a hogshead are legitimate imperial measurements.
[/URL]


I actually prefer the standard system because it's easier. Most of the measurements I use are in lengths. So I deal with inches feet and yards. This is a base 12 system and that's easier to use because you can divide it by 2,3,4,6 vs. The metric system that is only divisable by 2 and 5.
 
Canada uses a hybrid. We are metric in temperature, distance and speed but many of us use imperial for weight and height. Yet, we use cm for snowfall and mm for rainfall. It can be annoying having to convert for those in the US when talking of weather and such.
 
Didn't think much about it until track and field switched from yards to meters.

A mile.

1600 meters

1760 yards.

Once I moved here I was sold. Metric any day of the week. Far superior.
 
Didn't think much about it until track and field switched from yards to meters.

A mile.

1600 meters

1760 yards.

Once I moved here I was sold. Metric any day of the week. Far superior.

I agree, Bodh...

If a person can get the gist of the metric system - it really is easier to calculate various math challenges. I’m not great at it because I’m forced to work with the imperial system. But metrics is simpler.

Too bad that the US didn’t go through with changing over when it was proposed 30 or 40 years ago.
 
The high today will be 10 deg C. I prefer hearing it will be 50.

That’s because that’s all you know. When going to countries that use Celsius, and you’re emersed in hearing the daily temps it begins to make sense. Then when exposed to various changes in temps. You’ll start to ponder what the temp is in Celsius. Eventually when you feel a temp - you think - ah, it’s hot as hell, it’s like 35 degrees (95 degrees here).
 
That’s because that’s all you know. When going to countries that use Celsius, and you’re emersed in hearing the daily temps it begins to make sense. Then when exposed to various changes in temps. You’ll start to ponder what the temp is in Celsius. Eventually when you feel a temp - you think - ah, it’s hot as hell, it’s like 35 degrees (95 degrees here).

Yeah, I've been in metric countries enough to know 40 C is a heat wave. Funny thing is -40 is -40 regardless which temperature scale we're talking about, and that is damned cold.
 
I agree, Bodh...

If a person can get the gist of the metric system - it really is easier to calculate various math challenges. I’m not great at it because I’m forced to work with the imperial system. But metrics is simpler.

Too bad that the US didn’t go through with changing over when it was proposed 30 or 40 years ago.

Well for the sake of argument, america the greatest country in the world, metric countries not the greatest countries in the world, sometimes it makes sense to not be like everyone else. Also britain has been shifting slowly back to standard and has been teaching it again in schools, russia is also slowly bringing back their own standard measurements( which is a mistake their standard was more similar to germans standard, which was miles apart from british and roman standard) Also other countries in the world still use standard measurement even if their official measurement is metric, go to any european country and you will hear a weight or length measurement that is unique to that country, that people use themselves daily outside what the govt mandates.

Another thing with standard, standard for imperial is based off of roman measurements, a british mile and a roman mile were almost identical, many measurements were almost identical or atleast close, and both used a base ten system. The major advantage of base 12 is that it can be used without precision equipment, there are still roman mile markers in europe, and they are very close to actual mile markers, things like the colluseums and the pyramids were built with a base 12 system, and even today base ten countries need oddball construction sizes because base ten never cut it for construction.
 
50 Degrees Celsius is 122 F. That only matters in Phoenix.
 
I actually prefer the standard system because it's easier. Most of the measurements I use are in lengths. So I deal with inches feet and yards. This is a base 12 system and that's easier to use because you can divide it by 2,3,4,6 vs. The metric system that is only divisable by 2 and 5.

Seriously? Which would you rather divide by 6, 15 feet 7 5/8 inches or 2285 centimetres? I've dealt with length measurements all my working life and the metric system is far superior. For one thing, it's easier to be accurate when you're looking at millimeters than when you're dealing with sixteenths or thirty-seconds. For another, there's no ambiguity. It's amazing how often accidents like 28" becoming 2'8" happens when measurements are passed from person to person.
 
Seriously? Which would you rather divide by 6, 15 feet 7 5/8 inches or 2285 centimetres? I've dealt with length measurements all my working life and the metric system is far superior.
I disagree. And it isn't just divisable by 6, its also divisable by 2,3 and 4. Metric is not.

For one thing, it's easier to be accurate when you're looking at millimeters than when you're dealing with sixteenths or thirty-seconds. For another, there's no ambiguity. It's amazing how often accidents like 28" becoming 2'8" happens when measurements are passed from person to person.
accuracy is possible with both. I have micrometers that measure as small as a 10,000th of an inch.

And errors can be made regardless of the system of measurements.

I dislike the metric system because what is a third of a centimeter?
 
Well for the sake of argument, america the greatest country in the world, metric countries not the greatest countries in the world, sometimes it makes sense to not be like everyone else. Also britain has been shifting slowly back to standard and has been teaching it again in schools, russia is also slowly bringing back their own standard measurements( which is a mistake their standard was more similar to germans standard, which was miles apart from british and roman standard) Also other countries in the world still use standard measurement even if their official measurement is metric, go to any european country and you will hear a weight or length measurement that is unique to that country, that people use themselves daily outside what the govt mandates.

Another thing with standard, standard for imperial is based off of roman measurements, a british mile and a roman mile were almost identical, many measurements were almost identical or atleast close, and both used a base ten system. The major advantage of base 12 is that it can be used without precision equipment, there are still roman mile markers in europe, and they are very close to actual mile markers, things like the colluseums and the pyramids were built with a base 12 system, and even today base ten countries need oddball construction sizes because base ten never cut it for construction.

Thanks for the history.
 
50 Degrees Celsius is 122 F. That only matters in Phoenix.

I think that the Russians has a huge sun reflecting mirror mounted on a geo orbital satellite pointed at Phoenix. :lol:
 
Yeah, I've been in metric countries enough to know 40 C is a heat wave. Funny thing is -40 is -40 regardless which temperature scale we're talking about, and that is damned cold.

Are you saying that a broken clock is right two times a day? :mrgreen:
 
I cant get used to metric. I can tell the length of a meter, but when you get to centimeters or kilometers, youve lost me.
 
I cant get used to metric. I can tell the length of a meter, but when you get to centimeters or kilometers, youve lost me.

A pretty easy rule of thumb that I use is a mm is about 40 thousandths of an inch. 10 of them (1 cm) are roughly 3/8 inch, give or take, and 1000 mm or 1 m is about 40 inches. A km is a little more goofy--after all, what good is knowing a km is 40,000 inches?--but, if you consider it to be a little more than 1/2 mile, you are good to go.
 
I disagree. And it isn't just divisable by 6, its also divisable by 2,3 and 4. Metric is not.

accuracy is possible with both. I have micrometers that measure as small as a 10,000th of an inch.

And errors can be made regardless of the system of measurements.

I dislike the metric system because what is a third of a centimeter?

3.3 millimeters. It's very simple.what's a hundred divided by whatever?
Metric is divisible by whatever you want. It's whole numbers and decimals. Fractions, not so much. Picture this- we've both got only pencil and paper. We each have to do three division problems, dividing by 7. Your numbers are
1' 6 3/4"
22' 8 7/8"
8' 8 5/16"

My numbers are...
246 mm
2738mm
1488mm

Who has the easier job?
 
Back
Top Bottom