Lumière
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 5
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Great economic argument for having states take over the various programs not specified by the Constitution, i.e. education, welfare, etc., but not for unfairly taxing some people more than others due to state and local deductions. Are you calculating that cost into what the Red states pay that the Blue states do not?
Which red states?
Most of the top donor states happen to be blue and top feeder states are red.
In general, I do not like red and blue divisive arguments and you brought this into it.
That is not where I was going with this as my point was not to disparage any state.
We are the United States.
My point was the states that donate or balance their budgets with state tax revenues and do not feed should not be penalized in the new tax reform.