• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you let your teenage daughter hangout with a 32 year man?

Would you let your teenage daughter hangout with a 32 year old man?

  • Total voters
    84
AlbqOwl said:
Once you go ad hominem you lose the debate. Most especially when you do it by deliberately misrepresenting what I have argued. Do have a nice day.
Click to expand...

No ad hominem at all, And I am not misrepresenting your argument.

You wanted me to be mad at the media, the victims and Moores opponents, because of a pile of crap story that was made up to defend Moore. You wont debate because I caught you hypocritically presenting something that has no evidence that you can show me. The only people defending Moore from the evil media are Moore supporters. Go pretend that you are not trying to protect the dude. I mean if you were not trying to protect him why go on about how these people are destroying Moores life? Its just awful that these people are destroying this guys life right? Again what if the dude is a pedophile and that these are his real victims? Never mind them you care nothing about those women because you know it all having worked with such people. I am starting to think that these people you are working with are not being treated fairly.
 
No. Hell no. And if the fool showed up at my door he'd be greeted by a 12 gauge shotgun.
 
FreedomFromAll said:
No ad hominem at all, And I am not misrepresenting your argument.

You wanted me to be mad at the media, the victims and Moores opponents, because of a pile of crap story that was made up to defend Moore. You wont debate because I caught you hypocritically presenting something that has no evidence that you can show me. The only people defending Moore from the evil media are Moore supporters. Go pretend that you are not trying to protect the dude. I mean if you were not trying to protect him why go on about how these people are destroying Moores life? Its just awful that these people are destroying this guys life right? Again what if the dude is a pedophile and that these are his real victims? Never mind them you care nothing about those women because you know it all having worked with such people. I am starting to think that these people you are working with are not being treated fairly.
Click to expand...

You not only went ad hominem but you're still doing it in this post. Again have a nice day.
 
Paperview said:
Neither of those people were stripped of their duties, admonished by the Supreme Court of their state, and had their salary revoked.
Click to expand...

Richard M Nixon was still called President Nixon until the day that he died even though he resigned in disgrace. Bill Clinton is still called President Clinton even though the entire country knows that he committed perjury while in office and was a womanizer. Judge Roy Moore lost his position for standing up for his beliefs. I don't agree with those beliefs but I'm not going to refuse to use his title because of it.
 
Southern Dad said:
Richard M Nixon was still called President Nixon until the day that he died even though he resigned in disgrace. Bill Clinton is still called President Clinton even though the entire country knows that he committed perjury while in office and was a womanizer. Judge Roy Moore lost his position for standing up for his beliefs. I don't agree with those beliefs but I'm not going to refuse to use his title because of it.
Click to expand...

Moore was removed for not following the law.
 
AlbqOwl said:
You not only went ad hominem but you're still doing it in this post. Again have a nice day.
Click to expand...

I attacked your assertions not you. If I cannot argue what you say what is the point of even attempting to debate with you? In other words do not make yourself part of your argument if you dont want to be part of the debate.

BTW thanks I had a very nice day in the New Mexico sunshine.
 
Not a ****ing chance.
 
SmokeAndMirrors said:
No.

There is no 32-year-old who wants to hang out with 16-year-olds for any reason that is even remotely positive.

At absolute best, they are so woefully immature or messed up that they can't get anyone their own age to hang out with them. At best. And even then, they're a terrible example to a teenager. Most people like that I've met are way into drugs.

But the more likely scenario is that they're looking for naive targets.

So, no.

/endthread
Click to expand...

Exactly.

I knew a man in his 40's that liked to hang out with teen girls or young 20's.
He spent an inordinate amount of time talking about how most men were trying for naive targets , but he just like to hang and connect.

It was beyond weird as he claimed he hated all men as they were after teens and he was one of the few moral men.
 
If she is of legal age she has a right to make up her own mind who she hangs out with. Not sure what the legal age is in Alabama... but have a hunch it is 16.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom