• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is the first Suspect/Defendant Getting Charged in the Mueller Investigation?

Who are the first charges being filed against?

  • Total voters
    52
Common Sense 1 said:
Yup... they take their orders from the DNC and Clinton. Part of the resist movement.
Click to expand...

If CNN takes their sources directly from the DNC, why did Anderson Cooper have a segment questioning DNC leadership last night about their spending habits where the Dossier was concerned? I know you take your talking points directly from Trump's twitter account, so I don't expect to hear back from you for awhile as you gather your notes.
 
Well, as I recall, Mueller did inform Manafort he was going to be indicted, so...
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
If CNN takes their sources directly from the DNC, why did Anderson Cooper have a segment questioning DNC leadership last night about their spending habits where the Dossier was concerned? I know you take your talking points directly from Trump's twitter account, so I don't expect to hear back from you for awhile as you gather your notes.
Click to expand...


I get it you are a NEVERTRUMPGOP! So please do us a favor and stop acting like CNN is neutral when it comes to President Trump. They are not and we all know it!
 
Common Sense 1 said:
I get it you are a NEVERTRUMPGOP! So please do us a favor and stop acting like CNN is neutral when it comes to President Trump. They are not and we all know it!
Click to expand...

I see you didn't answer my question. So let's repeat it: If CNN takes their sources directly from the DNC, why did Anderson Cooper have a segment questioning DNC leadership last night about their spending habits where the Dossier was concerned?

Did you even know he reported on it?
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
I see you didn't answer my question. So let's repeat it: If CNN takes their sources directly from the DNC, why did Anderson Cooper have a segment questioning DNC leadership last night about their spending habits where the Dossier was concerned?

Did you even know he reported on it?
Click to expand...

What a whole 25 seconds after they spent 2 hours on the leaked grand Jury information.

Again:
I get it you are a NEVERTRUMPGOP! So please do us a favor and stop acting like CNN is neutral when it comes to President Trump. They are not and we all know it!
It's good to know that you understand that the Dossier was paid for and push by the DNC and Clinton.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
What a whole 25 seconds after they spent 2 hours on the leaked grand Jury information.

Again:
I get it you are a NEVERTRUMPGOP! So please do us a favor and stop acting like CNN is neutral when it comes to President Trump. They are not and we all know it!
It's good to know that you understand that the Dossier was paid for and push by the DNC and Clinton.
Click to expand...

In Hill interviews, top Dems denied knowledge of payments to firm behind Trump dossier - CNNPolitics :roll:

Clinton, the DNC and the making of the 'Trump dossier' -- what we know - CNNPolitics

Hillary Clinton unaware of dossier before it published - CNNPolitics

Clinton campaign, DNC helped fund Trump dossier research, report says - CNNPolitics

The Washington Free Beacon says it hired Fusion GPS during 2016 GOP primary - CNNPolitics

Pay attention this is what an objective media organization looks like.
 
lurchadams said:
CNN's reporting the grand jury has approved Mueller's charges filed against "someone".

Exclusive: First charges filed in Mueller investigation - CNNPolitics



Who do you think it is?

The choices are:
1. Paul Manafort
2. Michael Flynn
3. Jared Kushner
4. Someone Else.
Click to expand...

I predict it's going to be some low level nobody. Maybe Manafort, but that leaves Mueller with dealing the issue of Podesta. If Podesta is indicted, he knows too much about Clinton, Inc., and Mueller will not touch a Clinton. He turned a blind eye to Clinton, Inc. when he was FBI chief so I don't expect any afterthoughts about justice and all the old school BS.

Flynn? Well, it depends on what he is charged with. Again, there are lots of democrats talking to Russia. It is not illegal to do business with Russia, or talk to them. Foreign agent? Half the Clinton Foundation worked with foreign governments and never registered as agents while there were pimping cash for the Clintons. And again, Podesta is up to his neck in it.

For this reason, I see a simplified charge along the lines of Scooter Libby. No one was happy or sad about "Scooter" who, and life went on.

I wish they would not do this crap on a weekend. Just do it and quit with the parlor games.
 
lurchadams said:
It's called, "humor". Right-wingers like you, who constantly defend Trump's boorish behaviour should look into it. For example, I can you are showing feigned outrage right now. You must have "blood coming out of your nose - and blood coming out of your whatever".

Nota, you're great at dishing it out. Taking it? Not so great.
Click to expand...

That's not fair, Lurch. I normally agree with your posts, but this wasn't cool, and puts you on the same level as Trump, and his boorish behavior.
 
Superfly said:
That's not fair, Lurch. I normally agree with your posts, but this wasn't cool, and puts you on the same level as Trump, and his boorish behavior.
Click to expand...

When I see hypocrisy, I point it out.
 
lurchadams said:
When I see hypocrisy, I point it out.
Click to expand...

There's nothing wrong with pointing it out, but on the other hand, couldn't one say the same thing about what you said? You are complaining about Trump's boorish behavior, yet you rip a page out of his playbook? That makes you no better than Trump.
 
Mycroft said:
Other: Podesta.
Click to expand...

I agree, its seems that the Podesta group had some Russian dealing and Russian conclusion and possible lying to the feds about some connection. I understand, as has been reported in the NYT, that now that Manafort actually worked for that group.
Another point is Comey leak information to the press which is a crime so he is also or should be under investigation.
 
Last edited:
lurchadams said:
CNN's reporting the grand jury has approved Mueller's charges filed against "someone".

Exclusive: First charges filed in Mueller investigation - CNNPolitics



Who do you think it is?

The choices are:
1. Paul Manafort
2. Michael Flynn
3. Jared Kushner
4. Someone Else.
Click to expand...

Even though I don't usually vote on obviously biased partisan polls, I did in this case. It was fairly obvious that Manafort was going to be charged with something. And of course the rabid left will be sucking it up big time like Trump is right around the corner. I will give you 1% respect though for not putting Trump's name down as a choice and I wouldn't be holding your breath if I were you that Trump will ever face any charges.
 
Moderate Right said:
Even though I don't usually vote on obviously biased partisan polls, I did in this case. It was fairly obvious that Manafort was going to be charged with something. And of course the rabid left will be sucking it up big time like Trump is right around the corner. I will give you 1% respect though for not putting Trump's name down as a choice and I wouldn't be holding your breath if I were you that Trump will ever face any charges.
Click to expand...

Hey, not to get off track, but does everybody remember when we couldn't possibly vote for Clinton because of how intolerable it would be to have a President that was under investigation?

Where did that narrative go?
 
lurchadams said:
It's called, "humor". Right-wingers like you, who constantly defend Trump's boorish behaviour should look into it. For example, I can you are showing feigned outrage right now. You must have "blood coming out of your nose - and blood coming out of your whatever".

Nota, you're great at dishing it out. Taking it? Not so great.
Click to expand...

What a failed personal attack. Never mind that I've never defended Trump's boorish behavior; I don't like people who are passive-aggressive ugly and then fall back on "I was only kidding--can't you take a joke?"

I also don't like men trying to diminish other men by assigning them female characteristics (or using feminine terms of endearment), and that's why I asked about "Womanface."
 
Moderate Right said:
Even though I don't usually vote on obviously biased partisan polls, I did in this case. It was fairly obvious that Manafort was going to be charged with something. And of course the rabid left will be sucking it up big time like Trump is right around the corner. I will give you 1% respect though for not putting Trump's name down as a choice and I wouldn't be holding your breath if I were you that Trump will ever face any charges.
Click to expand...

We of the "Rabid Left" salute you! Trump might not face any charges for personally colluding with Russia, just has Chris Christie was never directly implicated in "Bridgegate".
 
nota bene said:
What a failed personal attack. Never mind that I've never defended Trump's boorish behavior; I don't like people who are passive-aggressive ugly and then fall back on "I was only kidding--can't you take a joke?"

I also don't like men trying to diminish other men by assigning them female characteristics (or using feminine terms of endearment), and that's why I asked about "Womanface."
Click to expand...

I disagree. I think using Trump's own words against you were genius and a tremendous success.

For not defending Trump's behavior you sure do a lot of attacking of those criticize him. Passive-aggressive? Pot, meet kettle.
 
lurchadams said:
I disagree. I think using Trump's own words against you were genius and a tremendous success.

For not defending Trump's behavior you sure do a lot of attacking of those criticize him. Passive-aggressive? Pot, meet kettle.
Click to expand...

Some friendly advice: let it go.
 
Cardinal said:
Hey, not to get off track, but does everybody remember when we couldn't possibly vote for Clinton because of how intolerable it would be to have a President that was under investigation?

Where did that narrative go?
Click to expand...

Considering that Trump lied multiple times about being under audit by the IRS (which is a fancy word for investigation) and that's why he couldn't release tax returns. I never thought that narrative mattered and also never took their excuses seriously. I had other problems with Hillary, but never once doubted the fact that they are both as corrupt as the other. Trump is just more of a flamboyant moron. While Hillary acts like Robot.
 
lurchadams said:
Why, is someone going to rain down "fire and fury" on me?
Click to expand...

The "womanface" thing is bizarre and doesn't reflect well on you. If you want to carry on, that's your call.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Considering that Trump lied multiple times about being under audit by the IRS (which is a fancy word for investigation) and that's why he couldn't release tax returns. I never thought that narrative mattered and also never took their excuses seriously. I had other problems with Hillary, but never once doubted the fact that they are both as corrupt as the other. Trump is just more of a flamboyant moron. While Hillary acts like Robot.
Click to expand...

The difference is Hillary no longer holds any relevance to anyone left of Roy Moore. She's very valuable to the right, however because she can constantly be used as a foil, or deflection against the GOP's own skeletons
(it's Halloween weekend so get used to more scary metaphors). :eek::skull:
 
Polar Bum said:
I don't think it matters what he looks like; you cant have a truly partisan rant without Ad Hom insults tossed in to help the narrative along.
Click to expand...

Bad day, why not lighten up and join in the fun. I heard all kinds of insults hurled at Hilldog and Mrs Obama on this very site, all from the Right Wing Hate Club. This kind of levity is killing time until Monday.

See you at the Russia hearings, oops, the Russia TRIALS !!
 
Common Sense 1 said:
"The charges are still sealed under orders from a federal judge"

Who leaked the information? How is it that CNN is the only one reporting this and everyone else is going with what CNN is reporting?
NBC ran the story this morning and said that CNN is reporting this but NBC can not verify the story?
Click to expand...

Rosenstein
 
Cardinal said:
Hey, not to get off track, but does everybody remember when we couldn't possibly vote for Clinton because of how intolerable it would be to have a President that was under investigation?

Where did that narrative go?
Click to expand...

That's not off of your anti-Trump track at all. Are you saying that Hillary should not be president? I totally agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom