- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 29,957
- Reaction score
- 14,682
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
In several news media I have read that Trump was so wowed by the French military parade on their independence day (the 14th of July or Bastille day). Now the difference in what the 2 days mean, the 4th of July is a democratic forming of a new country and with this declaring their independence from the English whereas Bastille day is a storming of a jail which is seen as the start of the revolution.
One is a peaceful act of independence the other a violent act of revolt against a king and the hunger/desperation of the time.
And the parade only started in 1880 and was not held where it is now but on a race course, this version of the parade is since the end of world war one.
And does the US need to strut it's military stuff? Everybody in the world knows the US armed forces are the best equipped forces in the world. They have the best gear and they have no need to do something usually done by countries with delusions of grandeur like Russia, China, North Korea and the French. Armies who cannot hold a candle to that of the US but want to remind their citizens that they are "mighty too". Which is nonsense and only meant to show how important and impressive their leader is on the world stage and for domestic propaganda uses.
The US does not need that IMHO, their might and power is shown on the battle fields around the globe during the past 100 years or so.
So what do you think, do we need images like this?
through the streets of Washington?
One is a peaceful act of independence the other a violent act of revolt against a king and the hunger/desperation of the time.
And the parade only started in 1880 and was not held where it is now but on a race course, this version of the parade is since the end of world war one.
And does the US need to strut it's military stuff? Everybody in the world knows the US armed forces are the best equipped forces in the world. They have the best gear and they have no need to do something usually done by countries with delusions of grandeur like Russia, China, North Korea and the French. Armies who cannot hold a candle to that of the US but want to remind their citizens that they are "mighty too". Which is nonsense and only meant to show how important and impressive their leader is on the world stage and for domestic propaganda uses.
The US does not need that IMHO, their might and power is shown on the battle fields around the globe during the past 100 years or so.
So what do you think, do we need images like this?
through the streets of Washington?