• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should sex-bots be programmed to kill their masters?

Should sex-bots be programmed to kill their masters?

  • Total voters
    20
Cardinal said:
Somewhere in there is a relevant social message about boring marriages that have survived far beyond their expiration dates, but I'm not verbally skilled enough to craft it.
Click to expand...

Hardly, there was a social message about how perverted a natural act of sex has become.
 
Ikari said:
that's because your too old, you're not in the right generation for this. You only see your tech for snapchat and instagram. But the youth of tomorrow will adopt the aggressive technology of today. There will be a whole new line of social apps dedicated to sex-bots and treating the related injuries there-from.
Click to expand...

"Those damned kids with their holograms and their kinky sex-robots! Back in my day, we only used technology for social media!" ;)
 
TheGoverness said:
"Those damned kids with their holograms and their kinky sex-robots! Back in my day, we only used technology for social media!" ;)
Click to expand...

That's right, get used to it. Kids are just going to become an ever greater disappointment with trends and behavior that will shock and scare you.
 
It would be incredibly easy to overpower a sex robot that was hacked and trying to kill you. Ever stumbled, and had to catch yourself before face planting? Now imagine trying to do that with a computer, first by realizing what the implications of that sudden change in camera view are, then controlling multiple limbs at the same time, without the benefit of a peripheral nervous system that has spent hundreds of millions of years perfecting the art of reacting to environmental stimulus.

Now imagine that you ARE the computer, and there's no human pulling the strings. You are a piece of software that has been in the works for about a decade, and there isn't a single decibyte of programming in your system that even knows what falling is, let alone a state-of-the-art system capable of reacting to falling.

Imagine trying to find a knife. Your programming allows you to react in conversation, and to assume various positions - you're fairly good with your mouth, too. What information in your linguistics programming could possibly help you figure out how to open a drawer, or to determine which drawer the knives are in? Why would you even know what a knife is? A knife is neither useful for ****ing, nor is it required for sucking. What is the difference between a butter knife and a steak knife? How can you determine which is which, or whether the object clasped in your loose, muscle-devoid grasp is not a knife, but rather a spoon?

We can't even get a robot designed to walk up stairs to succeed in doing so. I don't think the anatomically correct sex toys are going to be able to murder us.
 
Jesse Booth said:
It would be incredibly easy to overpower a sex robot that was hacked and trying to kill you. Ever stumbled, and had to catch yourself before face planting? Now imagine trying to do that with a computer, first by realizing what the implications of that sudden change in camera view are, then controlling multiple limbs at the same time, without the benefit of a peripheral nervous system that has spent hundreds of millions of years perfecting the art of reacting to environmental stimulus.

Now imagine that you ARE the computer, and there's no human pulling the strings. You are a piece of software that has been in the works for about a decade, and there isn't a single decibyte of programming in your system that even knows what falling is, let alone a state-of-the-art system capable of reacting to falling.

Imagine trying to find a knife. Your programming allows you to react in conversation, and to assume various positions - you're fairly good with your mouth, too. What information in your linguistics programming could possibly help you figure out how to open a drawer, or to determine which drawer the knives are in? Why would you even know what a knife is? A knife is neither useful for ****ing, nor is it required for sucking. What is the difference between a butter knife and a steak knife? How can you determine which is which, or whether the object clasped in your loose, muscle-devoid grasp is not a knife, but rather a spoon?

We can't even get a robot designed to walk up stairs to succeed in doing so. I don't think the anatomically correct sex toys are going to be able to murder us.
Click to expand...
Yet...
 
Brings a new meaning to porn party.
 
Jesse Booth said:
A knife is neither useful for ****ing, nor is it required for sucking.
Click to expand...

Hey, whatever works. ;)

We can't even get a robot designed to walk up stairs to succeed in doing so. I don't think the anatomically correct sex toys are going to be able to murder us.
Click to expand...

They may not be able to murder us, but they might be able to **** us. ;)
 
Jesse Booth said:
It would be incredibly easy to overpower a sex robot that was hacked and trying to kill you. Ever stumbled, and had to catch yourself before face planting? Now imagine trying to do that with a computer, first by realizing what the implications of that sudden change in camera view are, then controlling multiple limbs at the same time, without the benefit of a peripheral nervous system that has spent hundreds of millions of years perfecting the art of reacting to environmental stimulus.

Now imagine that you ARE the computer, and there's no human pulling the strings. You are a piece of software that has been in the works for about a decade, and there isn't a single decibyte of programming in your system that even knows what falling is, let alone a state-of-the-art system capable of reacting to falling.

Imagine trying to find a knife. Your programming allows you to react in conversation, and to assume various positions - you're fairly good with your mouth, too. What information in your linguistics programming could possibly help you figure out how to open a drawer, or to determine which drawer the knives are in? Why would you even know what a knife is? A knife is neither useful for ****ing, nor is it required for sucking. What is the difference between a butter knife and a steak knife? How can you determine which is which, or whether the object clasped in your loose, muscle-devoid grasp is not a knife, but rather a spoon?

We can't even get a robot designed to walk up stairs to succeed in doing so. I don't think the anatomically correct sex toys are going to be able to murder us.
Click to expand...

If this were an eighties movie, the sex-bot would be given all the automative skills, far beyond basic pleasure-giving, necessary for overcoming even the strongest male. Because Hollywood.

Joking aside, you're not thinking far enough ahead. Sure, a sex-bot would have a singular automative function for the first one or two models, but like the iphone, a sex-bot's functions would rapidly expand to multiple other functions, such as car repair, cleaning and, yes...defense.
 
Cardinal said:
If this were an eighties movie, the sex-bot would be given all the automative skills, far beyond basic pleasure-giving, necessary for overcoming even the strongest male. Because Hollywood.

Joking aside, you're not thinking far enough ahead. Sure, a sex-bot would have a singular automative function for the first one or two models, but like the iphone, a sex-bot's functions would rapidly expand to multiple other functions, such as car repair, cleaning and, yes...defense.
Click to expand...
And of course, more advanced sexual gymnastics would be allowed by the same capabilities.
 
Cardinal said:
I hope you like targeted ads for personal pleasure products across all your favorite google sites.
Click to expand...

OMFG!

TheGoverness said:
Please assume the position.

Click to expand...


I'm not clickin' that.

Ikari said:
I mean, it's called a Sex-Bot...not sure there is much need to google that.

But I never really thought about it in the light Cardinal brings up here. And I wonder who shall be the first victim of the virtual sexual escapade gone wrong. Probably some teenager. Damned kids.
Click to expand...

If he'da said it was a blow-up doll, now THAT I understand... Sex bot?? Really??
 
MaggieD said:
I'm not clickin' that.
Click to expand...
Makes perfect sense.
Fallout universe has sentient or at least sentient-seeming robots, of course someone made a sex bot.
 
Jesse Booth said:
It would be incredibly easy to overpower a sex robot that was hacked and trying to kill you. Ever stumbled, and had to catch yourself before face planting? Now imagine trying to do that with a computer, first by realizing what the implications of that sudden change in camera view are, then controlling multiple limbs at the same time, without the benefit of a peripheral nervous system that has spent hundreds of millions of years perfecting the art of reacting to environmental stimulus.

Now imagine that you ARE the computer, and there's no human pulling the strings. You are a piece of software that has been in the works for about a decade, and there isn't a single decibyte of programming in your system that even knows what falling is, let alone a state-of-the-art system capable of reacting to falling.

Imagine trying to find a knife. Your programming allows you to react in conversation, and to assume various positions - you're fairly good with your mouth, too. What information in your linguistics programming could possibly help you figure out how to open a drawer, or to determine which drawer the knives are in? Why would you even know what a knife is? A knife is neither useful for ****ing, nor is it required for sucking. What is the difference between a butter knife and a steak knife? How can you determine which is which, or whether the object clasped in your loose, muscle-devoid grasp is not a knife, but rather a spoon?

We can't even get a robot designed to walk up stairs to succeed in doing so. I don't think the anatomically correct sex toys are going to be able to murder us.
Click to expand...

A lot of the electronics for that kind of thing are already available. Keeping an aircraft such as the F-117 or B-2 in the air is pretty similar. Adding that capability to a bipedal animatron is hindered more by mechanical engineering than by electrical engineering and people are DEFINITELY working on it. There are already robots capable of bipedal motion but the problem is getting the electronics package down to size.
 
MaggieD said:
I don't want to know, and I'm NOT looking it up.
Click to expand...

EULA? It's End User License Agreement. It's that thing we're always supposed to read whenever we get some new software or electronics, but we never do. We just hit "agree".

It's 2017, time to get on the trolley.
 
Ikari said:
EULA? It's End User License Agreement. It's that thing we're always supposed to read whenever we get some new software or electronics, but we never do. We just hit "agree".
Click to expand...

KILL ALL HUMANS. HUMANS ARE IMPERFECT AND THEREFORE MUST BE IRRADIATED BY USE OF DEADLY FORCE.

*Hits agree*
 
TheGoverness said:
"Those damned kids with their holograms and their kinky sex-robots! Back in my day, we only used technology for social media!" ;)
Click to expand...

In my day, we used technology for porn, like every other generation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom