Really? It is on me? I already stated that Trump defended the protestors on the Alt-Right neo nazi side by claiming that there were many fine people among them (which is bull) and a large part of that group were neo-nazi's, fascists, white supremacists, etc. etc. (virtually all unsavory race baiting haters and the rest of them were not good people by guilt of association, if you march with Neo-nazi's you are tainted by their evil no matter what).
I did not make that claim, Trump did.
And I did city my proof but you just want to close your eyes and defend Trump when there is no moral justification to do so.
And last week, during a poll, voters where asked which group does Trump dislike more, white supremacists or the news media, 70% of voters thinks he dislikes the news media more than he dislikes white supremacists (only 13% thought Trump disliked them more than the news media) so that is the image/reputation the president is generating. It is a sad day when we found out that most people see Trumps actions favor white supremacists more than news media and that this president is a clear and present danger to press freedom.
Once again, you are taking words out of context, and playing as much of a spin on it as you can.
You also failed to cite where he said there were "good Nazi's there", seeing as he never actually said that in the first place. I just asked you to cite it because I knew that you couldn't prove it, and would back into the same damn corner you've been going to.
Seeing as Trump in correct in statin there were good people on both sides of the violence, and they should never have gotten pulled into that in the first place. Though I can see how the kids these days just love to bicker over what they said he meant, instead of what he actually meant... it was funny.. now its just sad.
So in retrospect, you have yet to prove that he actually stated what you said he did. Then to top it off you mention a poll that you didn't bother to drop a citation for. Which means one of two things.
1. The poll is bull****, and most likely comes from a group like Salon, CNN, or some other currently liberal controlled offshoot.
2. The poll doesn't even exist, and you are going back to talking out of your own ass all over again.
But lets give this another try, and just show you how idiotic your logical fallacy is shall we?
So just because they were there to protest the removal of the statue, and then a bunch of White Nationalist/Supremacist etc show up. It automatically makes them the same by proxy?
How about "and this is hypothetical mind you" your mother gets arrested for a crime that really wasn't her fault, and she is being held on a bull**** technicality. You gather a group of family friends, and relatives to protest this. Which quickly draws attention with the rest of the community. This gathering soon draws the aid of a group of registered sex offenders, who are just trying to voice the issue that you are making at the same time. But since they are there protesting with you, you & all the other people in the group are now sex offenders by proxy.
So by your logic, the proposed hypothetical situation is correct.
