- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 31,139
- Reaction score
- 22,297
- Location
- US of A
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
The liberals gave us a standard:
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." - attributed to Martin Luther King, Jr. but presumed to be plagiarized
It takes two to tangle and the masses assume that all whites are evil and nazis - more of that guilt by association
I am sickened by the liberal media and those suits that pretend that whites are not as good as the rest of the people in this country. The bigotry and racism they espouse is quite excessive when compared to what the white people have asked their elected leadership - excuse me EX leadership for.... equal protection of the laws.
The liberals gave us a standard:
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." - attributed to Martin Luther King, Jr. but presumed to be plagiarized
It takes two to tangle and the masses assume that all whites are evil and nazis - more of that guilt by association
I am sickened by the liberal media and those suits that pretend that whites are not as good as the rest of the people in this country. The bigotry and racism they espouse is quite excessive when compared to what the white people have asked their elected leadership - excuse me EX leadership for.... equal protection of the laws.
The liberals gave us a standard:
"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." - attributed to Martin Luther King, Jr. but presumed to be plagiarized
It takes two to tangle and the masses assume that all whites are evil and nazis - more of that guilt by association
I am sickened by the liberal media and those suits that pretend that whites are not as good as the rest of the people in this country. The bigotry and racism they espouse is quite excessive when compared to what the white people have asked their elected leadership - excuse me EX leadership for.... equal protection of the laws.
Who in mainstream media is claiming that all whites are evil? I'm not aware of a single mainstream journalist who holds that opinion. On the other hand, I do know David Duke hates all Jews and blacks and other people of color. I do know that the KKK and neo-Nazis want to deny equal protection under the law for minorities, and deny them due process of the law as well, in addition to banning freedom of speech, individual liberty and capitalism. I have a feeling you are merely projecting here.
It's 'it takes two to tango.' two to tango. the tango is a partner's dance widely considered the most intimate of dances.
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
It's what you call a play on words, son.
"Word play is verbal wit: the manipulation of language (in particular, the sounds and meanings of words) with the intent to amuse. Also known as logology and verbal play."
https://www.thoughtco.com/word-play-definition-1692504
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
What I expected, I'm sorry to say. He needs to divide the country,divert the media from the investigation and destroy us from within with his agenda and those he has placed in power in the WH and the administration in order to stay in power.
He's willing to throw his lot in with white supremacists because he has seen that his party won't call him out.
And if you're not enraged, you're not paying attention.
I've been reluctant to post a thorough take on Trump's response to the demonstration, the counter-protest, and the violence that culminated in death and injury. I come from a conservative family and believe it or not, they have cheered on the President's attempt at objectivity and fairness. Some in my own family have basically said, "the right has been angry for 8 years and now the time of reckoning is here, because the right is not going to stand the left rioting to destroy our property and history." So, that perspective is a real phenomenon in my life.
I don't know what video Trump watched where the "alt-left" was charging the "alt-right" with clubs. I saw the video of a neo-nazi intentionally weaponizing a car to a fatal outcome. It takes precious few views of that video, to see that was a crime with intent and malice. If I could find one word for my reaction to Trump's press conference from Tuesday; it would be "insulting". What self respecting American believes that, in the wake of tragedies, Trump cares deeply about accuracy and waiting for the facts, rather than manipulating them to score political points?? Remember when Trump misrepresented the Mayor of London's statements during the London Bridge Attack?
Another angle to consider: If any left group such as BLM or Antifa had perpetrated the murder of an innocent conservative protestor, Trump would have tweeted recklessly and in haste about them. And that goes double for if they had been a Muslim.
In addition, I feel like it is disingenuous to pretend that the protestors with torches were a bunch of innocuous history buffs standing up for the preservation of memory. Chants like "blood and soil" and "jews will not replace us" demonstrate they had different objectives. In my opinion they were a hostile reactionary sect, exploiting a hot button issue that should've stayed within their locality. And that they were using the statue, as a springboard to launch a national conversation about white supremacy, as well as finger how much support they have from Trump.
The issue of the statue being taken down was voted on by city council. So, if Charlottesville didn't like the outcome.. well, they voted those councilmen into office and they should've applied electoral pressure to their representatives when it mattered. Those representative represent you, that's how democracy works. I get that they didn't vote the way you wanted. Sorry, sometimes democracy hurts feelings. :shrug: They are free to protest all they want. But, killing someone for not getting your way, is undemocratic and decidedly not American.
Who in mainstream media is claiming that all whites are evil? I'm not aware of a single mainstream journalist who holds that opinion. On the other hand, I do know David Duke hates all Jews and blacks and other people of color. I do know that the KKK and neo-Nazis want to deny equal protection under the law for minorities, and deny them due process of the law as well, in addition to banning freedom of speech, individual liberty and capitalism. I have a feeling you are merely projecting here.
Simple question: What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?
No, it's not presumed to be plagiarized by any rational adult.
Yes, King was known for his plagiarism
No, there's no evidence that that's what 'the masses' assume. What a quaint self-delusion.
What an absolutely idiotic and meaningless statement
No one is pretending that. Fixtures and visions of one's imagination don't really serve well as a basis for a cogent argument. You are wasting my time with rubbish
Going to only speak of the first response...everything after is flailing that ranges from good to bad, but going to speak more in terms of the initial.
Had he ONLY responded regarding the violence, and condemned it in a general across the board fashion, I would've been fine and appropriate but felt it was lacking from a personal stand point. This is because ultimately it was the VIOLENCE, not the protest itself, that rose it to the level of a President needing to make a comment and thus commenting only on the violence would have been at least reasonable and acceptable imho.
Had he responded regarding the violence, and condemned it in a general across the board fashion, while also making it a point to call out the hateful and vile nazi's that were the spotlight of the protest in terms of their ideology and it's unacceptable nature, I would've felt it was the perfect and most apt response to make. I think undercutting the Nazi's belief that they have an ally in the White House on the whole of their ideology would be a beneficial thing and worth doing.
However, what Trump ultimately did was not only condemn the violence, but also the hatred and bigotry, in a general across the board fashion. This, too me, missed the mark. While I feel that criticism of the engagement in violence being across the board was reasonable, as both sides significantly contributed to the violent situation that occurred, attempting to equate the bigotry and hatred of Nazi's, the KKK, and White Surpemacists to those of the counter protesters is just wrong.
The Violence speaks of actions. The hatred, to a point, can speak of actions and ideology. However the bigotry part, that speaks of ideology.
The ideology of the Nazis, of the KKK, of the White Supremacists, and of the White Nationalists is indisputably more bigoted than that of the counter protester groups, even the more controversial ones like Antifa and BLM. Even if you think BLM's view of the justice system is wrong, their ideology is simply wishing the justice system to treat Blacks in a way that is equitable and comparable to whites. White Nationalists want the law and the systems within the country to explicitly be setup in a fashion that assures that a White National Identity is maintained. One of those things is inherently more bigoted than the other.
So overall, I was disappointed and negative towards Trumps comment. I had no issue with him condemning the violence on an across the board fashion, but IF he was going to talk about the "bigotry" of the matter as well then he should not have done that in an across the board fashion as well. By doing that, he weakened his statement and made it a disappointing one.
(Just as a note, before anyone goes "But BLM is about killing cops! They say fry them like bacon!". No, no it's not. SOME BLM members think that way, a small minority of them. That's not the primary goals of the organization as stated by those running it or the majority of it's followers. Just like my I'm not treating american Nazi's as automatically being in favor of literally carrying out another nation wide genocide of jewish people, despite some within it's ranks possibly desiring that, since that's not something that from what I can tell is actively pushed or argued for via the actual Nazi party.)
There is a racial divide in this country brought out into the open by Trump. The alt-right is now part of his base. America needs a unifier. Trump has chosen to divide instead.
Very serious questions are now popping up that question his mental state. Whether or not that is cause for impeachment I am not sure. But people from outside the country are increasingly becoming concerned that Trump could very well have issues reading between the lines. Maybe at the end the people who will continue to support him are the white racists and the dumb and ignorant wings of his base.