• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?

What did you think of Trump's overall response to Charlottesville?

  • I don't believe Trump should've responed at all.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (Please Explain)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    33
Not being able to understand that the responsibility for the fight goes to the one that starts it is the height of dumbassery. Trump is a dumbass. It was shown strongly in his response to this tragedy.
 
Having been around both sides and involved in this issue for a few decades, I find that you have a considerable ways to go before you are experienced enough to understand this subject

Sorry, our rules allow your types to be here; nothing says I have to engage with them.

I do so in this post simply to highlight this as a great opportunity to demonstrate the manner in which to treat those of this deranged, twisted, disgusting, and sickening ideology in the correct manner and method that is best for dealing with them in this country and of which they so thoroughly deserve.
 
Everyone has lost track of the ball. The entire Charlottesville incident began because the left is trying to knock down a historical artifact of General Lee, due to the emotional oversensitivity training of PC. The group on the defense of free speech, staged a legal protest. The left organized an illegal counter demonstration. The illegal counter demonstration was bought and paid for by Democratic party donors. Why are we not arresting those who paid others to illegally organize and incite a riot?

The situation is we have a pile of hay and the someone brings a match and lights the hay. The hay burns someone, and now everyone is blaming the hay. This is leftist illogic due to a lack of historical perspective. Shouldn't we go after the person who supplied the match, since if the match had not showed up, there would be no fire.
 
cluster****, pure and simple.

1u8snl.jpg
 
Sorry, our rules allow your types to be here; nothing says I have to engage with them.

I do so in this post simply to highlight this as a great opportunity to demonstrate the manner in which to treat those of this deranged, twisted, disgusting, and sickening ideology in the correct manner and method that is best for dealing with them in this country and of which they so thoroughly deserve.

And yet you had to respond. You are the one with a sick and twisted ideology.
 
The next time you want to criticize someone do it in English with words that actually mean something.

A. Sorry you can't make your case about plaigianrism and are forced to lie about it.
B. Yet again, you simply cannot back up your claim and are forced to run from it.
C. Your intellectual dishonesty is, if nothing else, quite bracing.
 
And your party was led by Robert Byrd, KKK and was as Hillary Clinton said " my mentor".

This is just a one sided MSM conveniently ignoring the other side, and the police giving them the show they wanted to replace the failed Russia rabbit.

My party? Stop making up delusional claims about me. Prove I'm a democrat or admit you falsely made up the claim and are not worthy of engaging in an adult debate. Put up or shut up.
 
Have you, as a point of fact, ever met with and talked to David Duke?

All day today the news has been going on and the corporations that worked with Trump are jumping ship because he said that some of the people on the protest side were fine people.

Traitors to this country serving under Trump act embarrassed that Trump would dare point out both sides were equally guilty for the violence. This steady stream of politicians that have had something negative to say presume that all the whites at the protest were motivated by hate and were connected to nazis. OTOH, had they said something to me like that - to my face, they'd be eating their teeth. I wonder how long they'd take it if all of a sudden BLM, the ADL and most of the left was being equated to being hate groups (and a lot of them ARE) and they were being the victims of guilt by association????

I've watched numerous videos by delusional David Duke. He's insane. I have also tried commenting on his videos, but since David Duke is a coward, typical of white supremacists, he bans all negative comments.

Both sides were not equally guilty. That's a fact. The neo-Nazis intentionally murdered peaceful protesters on the other side and committed murder. What neo-Nazi was killed? Zero.
 
I've watched numerous videos by delusional David Duke. He's insane. I have also tried commenting on his videos, but since David Duke is a coward, typical of white supremacists, he bans all negative comments.

Both sides were not equally guilty. That's a fact. The neo-Nazis intentionally murdered peaceful protesters on the other side and committed murder. What neo-Nazi was killed? Zero.

The hatemonger killed that girl of his own accord. It was not an organization that told him to do it. There was nothing peaceful about the left.
 
A. Sorry you can't make your case about plaigianrism and are forced to lie about it.
B. Yet again, you simply cannot back up your claim and are forced to run from it.
C. Your intellectual dishonesty is, if nothing else, quite bracing.

I didn't know I was supposed to make a case for a mere observation. The observation was not a part of the conversation, ergo irrelevant. It's not necessary to prove every statement.

I'm not running from ANYTHING - least of all you.

Intellectual dishonesty - OMG. You need some new material Just to shut you down:

Boston U. Panel Finds Plagiarism by Dr. King - NYTimes.com

If you want to discuss it further, feel free to start a thread. No need to hijack this one - unless you just like beating your chest and pretending to be an Internet tough guy. You don't impress me.
 
I didn't know I was supposed to make a case for a mere observation. The observation was not a part of the conversation, ergo irrelevant. It's not necessary to prove every statement.

Yawn. You can try and pass off lies as the truth all you'd like, but you're not doing it very well.
I'm not running from ANYTHING - least of all you.

You're running from your own claims. Yet another objective fact that apparently frightens you to death. And that's sad.
Intellectual dishonesty - OMG. You need some new material Just to shut you down:

Boston U. Panel Finds Plagiarism by Dr. King - NYTimes.com

If you want to discuss it further, feel free to start a thread. No need to hijack this one - unless you just like beating your chest and pretending to be an Internet tough guy. You don't impress me.

That STILL doesn't back up your very specific claim. The only hijacking going on here is you spouting lies, getting called on them and then sputtering and wheezing when you cannot back them up.

No one's looking to impress you. Why flatter yourself and pretend they are?
 
Yawn. You can try and pass off lies as the truth all you'd like, but you're not doing it very well.

You're running from your own claims. Yet another objective fact that apparently frightens you to death. And that's sad.

That STILL doesn't back up your very specific claim. The only hijacking going on here is you spouting lies, getting called on them and then sputtering and wheezing when you cannot back them up.

No one's looking to impress you. Why flatter yourself and pretend they are?

Reading isn't your strong suit, is it son? You want to flame me and start a whizzing contest, but I'm not interested. I said I doubted King authored those words and I proved his was a plagiarist. I'm done with it. There was no lie. Since I did not make a direct accusation, no need to defend myself.

Go play with yourself. I told you, if you want to do a thread about King - START ANOTHER THREAD. Otherwise leave me alone; I have no interest in having a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
 
Yawn. You can try and pass off lies as the truth all you'd like, but you're not doing it very well.

You're running from your own claims. Yet another objective fact that apparently frightens you to death. And that's sad.

That STILL doesn't back up your very specific claim. The only hijacking going on here is you spouting lies, getting called on them and then sputtering and wheezing when you cannot back them up.

No one's looking to impress you. Why flatter yourself and pretend they are?

Ain't nobody running from you little boy. If you want to rattle my cage, try PM.
 
Reading isn't your strong suit, is it son? You want to flame me and start a whizzing contest, but I'm not interested. I said I doubted King authored those words and I proved his was a plagiarist. I'm done with it. There was no lie. Since I did not make a direct accusation, no need to defend myself.

Go play with yourself. I told you, if you want to do a thread about King - START ANOTHER THREAD. Otherwise leave me alone; I have no interest in having a battle of wits with an unarmed man.

Nah. You lied, tried to pass off those lies as valid, and when you got called on them, ran in fear from them. It's what you do; no one expects anything different.

And to say that you didn't lie is to lie about your lying.

I love irony.
 
Ain't nobody running from you little boy. If you want to rattle my cage, try PM.

Anyone who requests a PM has already had their cage rattled.

I wish you didn't frighten so easily. Interet tough guys should try and at least appear tough.
 
Nah. You lied, tried to pass off those lies as valid, and when you got called on them, ran in fear from them. It's what you do; no one expects anything different.

And to say that you didn't lie is to lie about your lying.

I love irony.

Dude, get a freaking life. Nobody is running from you. You are being delusional and you're trolling.
 
Anyone who requests a PM has already had their cage rattled.

I wish you didn't frighten so easily.

You don't pack the gear it takes to frighten me. You post anonymously so you can be looked at, but if you want to threaten me, take it to PM.
 
You don't pack the gear it takes to frighten me. You post anonymously so you can be looked at, but if you want to threaten me, take it to PM.

It's OK that you're frightened to your core. Totally understandable that you'd have to pretend to yourself that you're being 'threatened'.

Why are you derailing this thread?
 
Moderator's Warning:
Knock it off now!
 
My party? Stop making up delusional claims about me. Prove I'm a democrat or admit you falsely made up the claim and are not worthy of engaging in an adult debate. Put up or shut up.

You are projecting as if you are one. Like Nazi's, you don't have to wear the funny hat to be one. Sorry to trigger you so early in the morning.
 
You are projecting as if you are one. Like Nazi's, you don't have to wear the funny hat to be one. Sorry to trigger you so early in the morning.

So, in other words, you resort to speculation, lies and name-calling while claiming to have a point that anyone should pay attention to? I'm not a demo, never have been one. There is absolutely nothing I have ever stated here that supports dems. Have you ever heard of centrists who are independent and who do not like racist Trump? Trust me, we definitely exist.
 
The hatemonger killed that girl of his own accord. It was not an organization that told him to do it. There was nothing peaceful about the left.

Nope. That hate-monger killed because he bought into the David Dukes of the world --=- their message of hate and cowardice. He was a neo-Nazi cowardly punk, just like Duke.
 
Back
Top Bottom