• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump protectionism will cause long term harm(economically -Militarily) to the US

Trump protectionism will cause long term harm(economically -Militarily) to the US


  • Total voters
    11

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,416
Reaction score
38,988
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Trade deals- excluding US
While Trump is on the rampage about trade deals, the rest of the world is moving on.

Whether you were in favor or not, TPP was much more than a trade deal. It would have denied access from China, these countries would have been a counterweight to the behemoth, China.
It would also open up newer markets to US trade and building Military alliances.

Ditching TPP when it could have been tweaked will cause the US long term harm and they will be squeezed out of Asia as China steps in with trade and cash.

Now the EU and Japan announce a new deal which will make US exports to the EU more expensive.

Trumps protectionist beliefs will cause the US long term

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...top-table-main_japantrade-950a:homepage/story

The pact would be a heavy blow to American producers of these goods, by making U.S.-made goods relatively more expensive and less competitive in the major markets of Japan and Europe.

https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/03/strategic-consequences-of-us-withdrawal-from-tpp.html

The TPP is a regional trade agreement involving the U.S. and 11 other Asian-Pacific countries that together comprise 40 percent of the world's economic output. The TPP's economic objectives included liberalization of trade in Asia, market reforms, and strengthened trade rules to support America's competitive industries and accord with the modern realities of digital commerce.

But the TPP also aimed to further the country's strategic interests in at least in three ways. First, U.S. leaders and strategists saw it as a way to strengthen the country's leadership in Asia by complementing its diplomatic and military power. Second, the TPP served as part of a broader effort to shore up an international order premised on market economics and liberal values. Third, the pact aimed to strengthen key partners; most notably Japan and Vietnam, by spurring badly needed domestic economic reforms and boosting growth.

The TPP thus served as an important component of the rebalance to Asia initiative. It also informed the U.S. approach to a rising China. By strengthening its leadership, bolstering its alliances and partnerships, and revitalizing an international order, Washington hoped to provide China strong incentives to integrate into and support a U.S.-led order.

America's withdrawal from the TPP in January 2017 marks a major blow to these ambitions.

Trump protectionism will cause long term harm(economically -Militarily) to the US

Yes-why
No -Why
Other- pls explain
 
Trade deals- excluding US
While Trump is on the rampage about trade deals, the rest of the world is moving on.

Whether you were in favor or not, TPP was much more than a trade deal. It would have denied access from China, these countries would have been a counterweight to the behemoth, China.
It would also open up newer markets to US trade and building Military alliances.

Ditching TPP when it could have been tweaked will cause the US long term harm and they will be squeezed out of Asia as China steps in with trade and cash.

Now the EU and Japan announce a new deal which will make US exports to the EU more expensive.

Trumps protectionist beliefs will cause the US long term

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...top-table-main_japantrade-950a:homepage/story



https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/03/strategic-consequences-of-us-withdrawal-from-tpp.html



Trump protectionism will cause long term harm(economically -Militarily) to the US

Yes-why
No -Why
Other- pls explain

As an economy entirely based on consumption of cheap leisurely and estential goods, a trade war is the last thing the United States should be engaged in.
 
Trade deals- excluding US
While Trump is on the rampage about trade deals, the rest of the world is moving on.

Whether you were in favor or not, TPP was much more than a trade deal. It would have denied access from China, these countries would have been a counterweight to the behemoth, China.
It would also open up newer markets to US trade and building Military alliances.

Ditching TPP when it could have been tweaked will cause the US long term harm and they will be squeezed out of Asia as China steps in with trade and cash.

Now the EU and Japan announce a new deal which will make US exports to the EU more expensive.

Trumps protectionist beliefs will cause the US long term

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...top-table-main_japantrade-950a:homepage/story



https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/03/strategic-consequences-of-us-withdrawal-from-tpp.html



Trump protectionism will cause long term harm(economically -Militarily) to the US

Yes-why
No -Why
Other- pls explain

I'm sure Trump feels he has vision. Someone should explain the differences between a vision and a hallucination to the "mouth that roared."
/
 
I'm sure Trump feels he has vision. Someone should explain the differences between a vision and a hallucination to the "mouth that roared."
/

Major countries that are allies of the US in trade and military are turning away from the US. The harm from dropping TPP, not renegotiating a trade/strategic alliance will lock the US out of Asia. The worlds fastest growing markets & urning it into a Chinese Sea
 
As an economy entirely based on consumption of cheap leisurely and estential goods, a trade war is the last thing the United States should be engaged in.

No, no, no, you're not getting it. Making basic goods more expensive and difficult to purchase will help our working class, while causing our partners to shift towards a China-dominated Pacific will enhance our national security!


Why - think about if we really pushed this, and we all went back to being subsistence farmers! 100% employment!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom