- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 40,960
- Reaction score
- 55,120
- Location
- Houston Area, TX
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
She needs to go away because she's not funny.
So true. She's a comedian in name only.
She needs to go away because she's not funny.
So true. She's a comedian in name only.
Standards and your scrupels shouldn't be defined by party lines. If you sincerely believed that the images of Obama being lynched and having artists like Ted Nugent call for Obama's execution were offensive then you should absolutely hold Griffen, and anyone else who is considered a democrat to that same standard.
Unless of course you want to be a partisan hack.
Not that I want to make it a crime for what she did, but just imagine some Republican of the same fame level doing this or a fake lynching of an Obama body double.
So, first of all, I hate Trump, and all he stands for, and I think the world will be a better place starting from first second he is no longer in office. Just to make sure you know where I'm coming from...hehe...
However:
No Cookies | Herald Sun
At some point we need to start holding ourselves to account, and this seems to be a pretty good place to begin. There are enough legitimate issues to tackle, and enough legitimate ways to do it, that I think we can say there is a bar, and this falls below it.
I don't think it's good to insert too much opinion into a poll, so I'll wait to discuss it in the thread... What do you guys think?
PS: This is not a poll about Free Speech.
So, here's my take on all of this.
Regarding what anyone else has done, in terms of burning effigies, or any other inflammatory gesture from the Right, I'm not sure I care. We, on the Left, constantly make fun of the Right for deflecting Trump's poor behavior by referencing real or supposed gaffes from the Left. If we want to continue to enjoy that high road, we need to ensure that we condemn the actions of those claiming to be on "our side" with equal passion. So, "Yes, she did a bad thing, but so did {fill in the blank}" doesn't work for me personally as a good response from the Left on this.
Now, I know it's tough...it often feels like if anyone, regardless of "side", gives an inch, the other "side" doesn't just take a mile, they take the whole road. But at the end of the day, integrity is a long term investment. And when it comes to dealing with undeniably bad behavior, the quickest way to stop the noise is to say "You're right, she shouldn't have, and we never would". It also allows us to stay on the high road, which is ultimately where you want to me - I mean, if you can't be on the high road with your political ideologies, maybe you need to rethink your political ideologies, no?
This should embarrass the Left, because it was done in our name. The right response to that embarrassment is to make it clear that this behavior is below us. If we're that sure of our position, we don't need to condone or defend this kind of behavior, it's clearly gross, and stands on it's own, regardless of what "the other guys" did in the past.
My 2 cents...
Here's my 2 cents.
This kind of crap will just keep getting worse as long as we view everything as a "left" or a "right" issue. We are all Americans and this nation was founded on the fundamental principle that as long as we remain free from political oppression we will continue to be free to conduct our lives and our affairs in the myriad ways we believe will benefit us most. What has happened, however, is that we have become beholden to one of two major political parties. The result is that we have divided ourselves along ideological lines. We no longer think in terms of "America". We think in terms of how we can increase the power of our chosen party. We have, in effect, chosen to be subjects of the state rather than leaders in our own realms, striving for a more free society with ever greater opportunity.
Freedom comes with responsibility. If we wish to remain free we, at the individual level, need to care for our children, care for our environment and care for our communities. Those responsibilities must not be delegated to the state because in every case the state will seek first to satisfy themselves.
We have, for the past several decades, been looking to the state to save us from ourselves. Trump is the first president we have seen in a long time that will not make an attempt to save us and the backlash against him is the result of fear. It's the result of fear that we may once again need to stand up for ourselves and, in doing so, also stand up for the principles on which this nation was founded.
The Griffin thing is a sick joke. It's a pathetic reflection of what we have become as a nation and it's something we should look at as a learning experience.
So, I agree with your first paragraph and your last paragraph, and your second paragraph is pretty good too. So, we're mostly in agreement. But stepping back from the polarization that Trump and Clinton crystalized beyond anything seen before isn't as easy as "Hey, you know, you really should stop it"... Like it or not, you guys are a nation totally and completely divided, almost down the middle. That's a long road back you're looking at, and building integrity is a part of that....and building integrity means calling out your own "side's" fringes, as it is the fringes that make it impossible for the two sides to start talking to each other like neighbors again...
So, first of all, I hate Trump, and all he stands for, and I think the world will be a better place starting from first second he is no longer in office. Just to make sure you know where I'm coming from...hehe...
However:
No Cookies | Herald Sun
At some point we need to start holding ourselves to account, and this seems to be a pretty good place to begin. There are enough legitimate issues to tackle, and enough legitimate ways to do it, that I think we can say there is a bar, and this falls below it.
I don't think it's good to insert too much opinion into a poll, so I'll wait to discuss it in the thread... What do you guys think?
PS: This is not a poll about Free Speech.
1. I didn't know who Kathy Griffith was before this whole debacle.
2. The photoshoot was tasteless
3. Anyone who is outraged over this but knowingly voted in a president that admitted to grabbing women by the ***** can jog on, as far as I'm concerned. Your double standards are clear.
Why that Republican would probably be welcomed by Trump into the White House.
Of course, unlike with Nugent, the left condemned Kathy Griffin.
So, first of all, I hate Trump, and all he stands for, and I think the world will be a better place starting from first second he is no longer in office. Just to make sure you know where I'm coming from...hehe...
However:
No Cookies | Herald Sun
At some point we need to start holding ourselves to account, and this seems to be a pretty good place to begin. There are enough legitimate issues to tackle, and enough legitimate ways to do it, that I think we can say there is a bar, and this falls below it.
I don't think it's good to insert too much opinion into a poll, so I'll wait to discuss it in the thread... What do you guys think?
PS: This is not a poll about Free Speech.
Lefty here. While I'm no fan of Donald Trump, I do think Kathy Griffin went too far with that photo shoot. It was very disrespectful, not to mention a little bit disturbing.
CNN has decided to end its decadelong relationship with Kathy Griffin as a result of the comedian’s controversial photo shoot, in which she held a prop that resembled the bloodied head of President Donald Trump.
It makes fun of beheadings. I wonder how the Berg family feels after seeing her nonsense.
There are some places you just shouldn't go.
Gianforte looks like a guy that will really fight for you.
Where did Nugent perform a mock lynching of Obama? I must have missed that part.
Yes it was way to far, but if she showed Trump in Black Face and all Tared & Feathered, maybe that would be more palatable, at least it was with it was done to the previous President.