• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?[W:40]

Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?

  • Yese

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • No

    Votes: 19 76.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Re: Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?

Even if he were to claim it, that doesn't necessarily make it so.

Of course it would.
 
Re: Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?

Yes you did, here:




You twice implied that inviting a BLM member to the white house was equivalent to inviting a terrorist, which is complete and total bull****.

The question posed, as you quoted me you should know, was: "The question that I would ask is has either given legitimacy to either of their causes?"

The example of Obama inviting BLM to the White House gave them legitimacy they didn't deserve, at least I don't think so, considering that weren't they the ones, or at least at one of their demonstrations, were shouting "Pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon", and in another "What do we want? Dead cops now!".

Those two chants seem rather militant, don't you think so?

There is no parallel example in the Trump case that I can recall, specific to giving "Chrisitan terrorists" legitimacy (whatever a Chrisitan terrorist is).

So if I understand your response then, it would seem that you believe that BLM is a legitimate and peaceful activist group, worthy of legitimacy, where as Christians are all terrorists and are not worthy of any legitimacy. An interesting take on that, but not one that I'd share with you.

My point was not about the groups, nor about which may or may not be terrorists, but whom gave or enhanced that group's legitimacy.
 
Re: Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?

The question posed, as you quoted me you should know, was: "The question that I would ask is has either given legitimacy to either of their causes?"

The example of Obama inviting BLM to the White House gave them legitimacy they didn't deserve, at least I don't think so, considering that weren't they the ones, or at least at one of their demonstrations, were shouting "Pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon", and in another "What do we want? Dead cops now!".

Those two chants seem rather militant, don't you think so?

There is no parallel example in the Trump case that I can recall, specific to giving "Chrisitan terrorists" legitimacy (whatever a Chrisitan terrorist is).

So if I understand your response then, it would seem that you believe that BLM is a legitimate and peaceful activist group, worthy of legitimacy, where as Christians are all terrorists and are not worthy of any legitimacy. An interesting take on that, but not one that I'd share with you.

My point was not about the groups, nor about which may or may not be terrorists, but whom gave or enhanced that group's legitimacy.

It's laughably stupid and hyperbolic comments like this that make people around here not take you seriously. Keep raging, kid.
 
Re: Is Trump responsbile for violence by Chrisitan terrorists?

It's laughably stupid and hyperbolic comments like this that make people around here not take you seriously. Keep raging, kid.

I take this to mean that you've given up trying to claim "putting BLM on the same exact footing as terrorists and the KKK" ?
 
Trump is responsible for terrorism by 'covfefe' terrorists.

:lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom