• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should the Primary Role of Immigration be to Benefit Citizens

Should the Primary Role of Immigration be to Benefit Citizens?

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
phattonez said:
Oh please. :roll:

Cut the "I'm so offended" routine and answer a simple thought experiment. Or, if it's really such a hurdle of a micro-aggression, replace China with any other big country. Try Russia. ;)
Click to expand...

Liberals are children, what do you expect?
 
Gaea said:
No the primary role of immigration is not to benefit citizens. The primary role of immigration is to give a limited number of people (depending on the country's immigration laws) the opportunity to move to a country which is desirable for one reason or another.

The objective of immigration laws is to facilitate this without letting the existing population be overrun by people with different values, and result in a loss of culture.
Click to expand...

I combined your message & think it is the ideal message.
The objective of immigration laws is to facilitate a limited number of people the opportunity to move to a country without letting the existing population be overrun by people with different values, and result in a loss of culture.

The problem is that the huge influx of peoples entering this country allowed by the politicians, does not follow that path!
Consider Minnesota: Two allies benefitted from the Somolian invasion to this Northern state. The Democratic party
seeing votes from these type groups were only too happy to approve this phenomenon. Their partner in crime the Lutheran
Church claiming IMO idealistic motives sponsored Somalian entry for monetary reasons. I don't think the church folk thought
they would be able to change Muslims into avid Lutheran worshippers who would assimilate, I think the money offered from
the Obama & Bush administrations made them willing accomplices.
 
phattonez said:
Oh please. :roll:

Cut the "I'm so offended" routine and answer a simple thought experiment. Or, if it's really such a hurdle of a micro-aggression, replace China with any other big country. Try Russia. ;)
Click to expand...

And you personally know how many people from China, phattonez?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom