• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Russian/Trump Connections are what?

Russian / Trump connections are what?

  • This is a serious issue that requires further investigation before my mind is made up

    Votes: 11 68.8%

  • This is a ploy concocted by the Democrats to stall any and all cabinet picks

    Votes: 1 6.3%

  • This is the story that will eventually lead to Trump's impeachment

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • This is an annoying phony story. Fake News.

    Votes: 3 18.8%

  • Trump doesn't know anything about the Russian talks/there are no more people involved in the story.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • This is a damaging story that proves that Trump has many ties to Russia

    Votes: 5 31.3%

  • It's all linked to the DNC hacking scandal/Trump's messy and secret finances/other business deals.

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • Putin is holding the Russian Peegate sex tape over Trump in order to negotiate back-channel deals.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    16
ModerateGOP said:
Is your opinion, you don't know what Sessions talked about with Russia, so you think the Russian connections are meaningless? Really?
Click to expand...


I knew you wouldn't answer my question. Are you capable of delivering a straight forward answer? If you answer my question I will make my point.

What did Sessions talk to the Russian ambassador about?
 
NonoBadDog said:
I knew you wouldn't answer my question. Are you capable of delivering a straight forward answer? If you answer my question I will make my point.

What did Sessions talk to the Russian ambassador about?
Click to expand...

This information hasn't yet been released to the public as far as I know. This is why we at least need an investigation into the matter, do you agree with that? But it's good that you are at least admitting he did talk with Russians since a few days ago he lied to Congress and the American people about it. However, this thread isn't about Sessions specifically it is about Trump and all the people he has aligned himself with. I see a lot of Russian hawks what about you?
 
ModerateGOP said:
This information hasn't yet been released to the public as far as I know. This is why we at least need an investigation into the matter, do you agree with that? But it's good that you are at least admitting he did talk with Russians since a few days ago he lied to Congress and the American people about it. However, this thread isn't about Sessions specifically it is about Trump and all the people he has aligned himself with. I see a lot of Russian hawks what about you?
Click to expand...

You want to get into the weeds at light speed. It's a diversionary tactic.

Story for ya.

Young bull and old bull are up on a hill looking down at a bunch of cows. Young bull says, "Lets run down there and mate with one of those cows." Old bull says, "Let's walk down and mate with all of them."

Let's take this slow so we don't get tangled up here.

So you want a an investigation about a Senator who is a member of the Armed Services Committee, who has Democrat members that talked to the same ambassador in the same capacity. What are they to investigate? Are they going to investigate McCaskil also? What about Schumer? Do you think they should investigate Schumer? Is there any evidence that Sessions did anything wrong? Just because you are suspicious doesn't mean that your suspicions are rational. Do you think we should just launch investigations on baseless suspicion? The "but it could happen" kind of suspicion?
 
NonoBadDog said:
You want to get into the weeds at light speed. It's a diversionary tactic.

Story for ya.

Young bull and old bull are up on a hill looking down at a bunch of cows. Young bull says, "Lets run down there and mate with one of those cows." Old bull says, "Let's walk down and mate with all of them."

Let's take this slow so we don't get tangled up here.

So you want a an investigation about a Senator who is a member of the Armed Services Committee, who has Democrat members that talked to the same ambassador in the same capacity. What are they to investigate? Are they going to investigate McCaskil also? What about Schumer? Do you think they should investigate Schumer? Is there any evidence that Sessions did anything wrong? Just because you are suspicious doesn't mean that your suspicions are rational. Do you think we should just launch investigations on baseless suspicion? The "but it could happen" kind of suspicion?
Click to expand...

So your opinion about all the russian ties to Trump is that it is just baseless suspicion? And that one off the cuff meetings some Democratic Senators did a few years ago are worse?
 
ModerateGOP said:
So your opinion about all the russian ties to Trump is that it is just baseless suspicion? And that one off the cuff meetings some Democratic Senators did a few years ago are worse?
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything of the kind. I asked simply asked you a question. You admitted that nobody knows what they talked about. You ignored the question and got into the weeds again and still haven't provided any reason to investigate the meeting between Sessions and the Russian ambassador other than baseless suspicion and "cuz Trump". It is normal for a person in the committee that he was in to confer with diplomats from other countries, as demonstrated by McCaskil, and several other Democrats in different political positions, that met with the same Russian ambassador.
 
ModerateGOP said:
So with all this Russian Stuff coming out and how the Trump campaign had secret back channel talks with Russian officials during the Republican Convention and also at Trump tower it seems to me that this scandal is not going to go away anytime soon. Sessions is clearly on his last legs and I have a feeling more officials are going down. What say you?

Check all that apply.

1. This is a serious issue that requires further investigation before my mind is made up
2. This is a ploy concocted by the Democrats to stall any and all cabinent picks
3. This is the story that will eventually lead to Trump's impeachment
4. This is an annoying phony story. Fake News.
5. Trump doesn't know anything about the Russian talks, and there are no more people involved with the story.
6. This is a damaging story that proves that Trump has many ties to Russia
7. This is all linked back to the DNC hacking scandal and Trump's messy and secret finances and other business deals.
8. Putin is using the Russian Peegate sex tape as a hold over Trump in order to negotiate things through back-channel deals.

Sorry this was supposed to be a poll. :(
Click to expand...

4 and 9.
9.A load of crap by democrats and other sore losers in an attempt to de-legitimize president Trump. This is their version of Obama's birth certificate conspiracy and Bush lied for war nonsense that only loony partisan tard conspiracy theorists believe. Those people run the risk of their loony conspiracy theories falling on deaf ears. When other democrats had meetings with Russians its idiotic to whine about how that's a different subject. No its not a different subject.Because if it wasn't any big f-ing deal when democrats met with Russians then it is no big f-ing deal when republicans do it to. The only smoke out there isn't smoke its steam coming from off the heads of sore losers who lost the election(including insane war mongering RINOs like John McCain and Lindsey Graham and their ilk).
 
Last edited:
YorkshirePete said:
How long did watergate take?
It is hilarious, bill was impeached for a BJ, our top cop commits purgery. Nothing like comparable crimes
Click to expand...

The impeachment of Bill Clinton was initiated by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, against Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice. Sessions did not commit perjury. What happened when congress sent a criminal and civil contempt in the Fast and Furious matter to the DOJ. NOTHING! Holder was the first AG in history to be held in contempt.
 
I have no idea.

But one thing is certain (to me)...the Trump Administration sure did/is handling this problem crappily.
 
imrs.php
 
These flowing accusations are nothing but firm and golden examples of peeposterousness.
 
American said:
I'll bet your reasons are lame and irrelevant. You people are desperate.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'll bet they weren't working for Obama on his first run president...

Whadd'ya wanna bet?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom