• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time to appoint a Special Prosecutor ref Russia allegations?

Time to appoint a Special Prosecutor ref Russia allegations?

  • I am a Dem- No -Why

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am a Repub – Yes-Why

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am not a US Citizen No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    31
No, in our system there needs to be probable cause before the state launches such an attack.

There is probable cause that the Russians were helping Trump in the election and there is also the appearance of coordinating by Trump surrogates. The appearance of guilt justifies the investigation by a SP.
 
There is probable cause that the Russians were helping Trump in the election and there is also the appearance of coordinating by Trump surrogates. The appearance of guilt justifies the investigation by a SP.

There is no appearance that Trump did anything wrong. As for what some people imagine the Russians did we have been through it already. A special prosecutor is for if we think TRUMP did something wrong.

There is zip evidence of that.
 
Last edited:
There is no appearance that Trump did anything wrong. As for what some people imagine the Russians did we have been through it already. A special prosecutor is for if we think TRUMP did something wrong.

There is zip evidence of that.

Don't you want to know what Trumps people were saying when they had all those "contacts" with Russian agents? What do you think the purpose of those contacts was? We already know that Russia hacked the DNC and Russian troglodytes planted fake news to hurt Hillary. What we don't know for sure is whether Trumps campaign knew and were coordinating with the Russians. The evidence so far is not reassuring.
 
There is probable cause that the Russians were helping Trump in the election and there is also the appearance of coordinating by Trump surrogates. The appearance of guilt justifies the investigation by a SP.

What probable cause is that? The evidence that we have not seen yet because it's "classified" and revealing it would allegedly reveal methods used to get that "info"?
 
What probable cause is that? The evidence that we have not seen yet because it's "classified" and revealing it would allegedly reveal methods used to get that "info"?

Right. So let's believe Putin instead? That is so foolish that I can't even comment. Our ancestors are turning in their graves. Putin is our enemy and his goal is to destroy us from within.
 
The truth must be discovered.... ALL of the truth. And to do that, nobody associated with the campaign or administration can be involved since it is in their interests to bury and proof of Trump and Russian collusion.
 
Right. So let's believe Putin instead? That is so foolish that I can't even comment. Our ancestors are turning in their graves.

If our ancestors are turning in their graves its because of all the morons who are okay with "classified" evidence. There is no way in hell a jury today would convict someone with out actually looking at the evidence.

Putin is our enemy and his goal is to destroy us from within.

And a lot of people in the intelligence community are Obama appointees IE Trump's enemy. If there was any credible evidence then it would have been released on day one.
 
Yup, or else we will be talking about this for the entire 4 years until Trump gets booted (hopefully) from the White House :lol:.

Time to find out if it happened or not so that we can let this rest (until the next Trump ****storm comes a rollin' into town).
 
If Benghazi was worth 60 Hearings ... this is worth 1

well since there wasn't 60 hearings of Hillary's incompetence there shouldn't be any on this non issue
 
What was that thing she did for 19 hours ... Lunch

not relevant to my point

Not even close, certainly no cigar
 
I think the more republicans resist talking about, or investigating, all of this Russian stuff the worse it is for them. Then again, investigations like these can span years and have permanent negative political impacts on people. We all watched the Benghazi circus that lasted years, and effectively destroyed Hillary's image. As a citizen I am curious about all of these ties to Russia. I do not believe in the more extreme Manchurian candidate style conspiracies, but it is popping up way too much for there to be absolutely nothing going on.
Looks like John Podesta owned stock in Putin's energy company.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
 
If our ancestors are turning in their graves its because of all the morons who are okay with "classified" evidence. There is no way in hell a jury today would convict someone with out actually looking at the evidence.



And a lot of people in the intelligence community are Obama appointees IE Trump's enemy. If there was any credible evidence then it would have been released on day one.

The bottom line is you choose to believe Putin over our own intelligence services and you choose to ignore the "constant communications" with Russian operatives Trump team had during the campaign and your excuse is based strictly on blind partisanship. So congratulations, you are just another pawn of Putin and his war on democratic Govts. worldwide. In my view, you bring new meaning to the word deplorable.
 
I think you have enough problem to worry about with Don Cheeto as your Hero :lamo

Have a nice weekend.

Unlike lefties, Politicians are not heroes to me. I tend to see them-at best-as necessary evils, not people to worship. Then again, unlike progressives, I am not dependent on government nor do I see government as something I need to get even with

corporations
successful people
gun owners
white Males
Christians

as so many progressives do
 
All this Russian commotion is pure, unadulterated, not factual in the least, ideologically driver, left over Obama moles bull****, and undeserving of even the rediculous attention that it's already getting.
 
Is it time to appoint a Special Prosecutor ref Russia allegations?

1stFlynn, now Sessions testimony in the Senate
Former campaign manager resigns over Russian contacts
How many others had contact?
What and who did they have contact with?
How often was the contact?
What was discussed?????
Was US security placed at risk?
Was financial inducement provided or offered?
Without doubt US Allies and their Intelligence Agencies are going WTF??
Kerist, the questions arising from this are a mile long.

I am a Dem- Yes -Why

I am a Dem – No -Why

I am a Repub – Yes-Why

I am a Repub – No-Why

I am Ind – Yes-Why

I am Ind - No-Why

I am not a US Citizen Yes

I am not a US Citizen No

https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&e...DA&gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+campaign+russia+ties+&*

https://www.google.com/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=sYt7WJXjHsqh8wePr66IDA&gws_rd=ssl#q=flynn++russia+ties+&*



[video]https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4644097/trumpesp[/video]
Edit- Sessions testified under Oath at his confirmation hearings

I am an American. Yes.
 
All this Russian commotion is pure, unadulterated, not factual in the least, ideologically driver, left over Obama moles bull****, and undeserving of even the rediculous attention that it's already getting.

17 US Int agencies state that Russia did interfere with the elections. In 2008, Trumps son stated that they (Trumps Companies) had significant investment from Russians.
 
17 US Int agencies state that Russia did interfere with the elections. In 2008, Trumps son stated that they (Trumps Companies) had significant investment from Russians.

I'm talking about the alleged (and probably bogus) Russian 'contact'.

Other than those claims you've repeated above, I've never seen any proof.
Have you?
I'm also starting to wonder which specific people are associated with those claims, and on what data, evidence, those claims are made.

Far, far, far too many loose accusation flying around DC these days, non of which seem to be particularly substantiated in fact, and most seem to be political ploys.
 
The bottom line is you choose to believe Putin over our own intelligence services and you choose to ignore the "constant communications" with Russian operatives Trump team had during the campaign and your excuse is based strictly on blind partisanship. So congratulations, you are just another pawn of Putin and his war on democratic Govts. worldwide. In my view, you bring new meaning to the word deplorable.

It has nothing to do with believing Putin. It has everything to do with evidence. So far no actual evidence has presented. Heck I bet right now you and ever other die hard anti-Trumper is mocking Trump for saying Obama had Trump tower wire tapped when you gladly accept claims of Russian interference in our election without any actual evidence.
 
It has nothing to do with believing Putin. It has everything to do with evidence. So far no actual evidence has presented. Heck I bet right now you and ever other die hard anti-Trumper is mocking Trump for saying Obama had Trump tower wire tapped when you gladly accept claims of Russian interference in our election without any actual evidence.

The word of every information service in the free world is not "no actual evidence". You are not thinking clearly.
 
C6HWKmsWAAEtmlr.jpg
 
IF there were any "there" there......we'd need a special prosecutor.

However, after months of allegations and accusations of Trump wrongdoing.......there is still zero evidence that anything even happened.

Thus.......much ado about nothing.
 
Back
Top Bottom