• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Lena VS Milo: Who is Worse?

Lena VS Milo: Who is Worse


  • Total voters
    31

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.
 
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.

anonymous polls are the worst
 
Both are hacks, but Milo takes the cake.

Both are examples of what no one should aspire to be like.
 
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.
I had to give the edge to Lena.

From Lena Dunham's wiki page...
Racial controversy

The premiere of the Girls pilot was also met with criticism regarding the all-white main cast in the otherwise culturally diverse setting of New York City (the only black actors in the pilot were a homeless man and a taxi driver, and the only Asian actress had the sole trait of being good at Photoshop).

Lesley Arfin, a writer for the show, responded to the controversy with the tweeted comment: "What really bothered me most about Precious was that there was no representation of ME." Afrin later deleted the comment following uproar on social media claiming her tweet was racist.
While Milo gets condemned Lena gets celebrated. This means that even if we assume that they're both equally awfullicious, Dunhams bigotry and endorsement of discrimination has mainstream establishment support while Milo does not. This makes Lena more dangerous.

And then there's this...
In April 2016 she wrote in support of Hillary Clinton, pledging to move to Vancouver, Canada, if Donald Trump won the election. After Trump's win, Dunham wrote she will not be moving to Canada, saying, “I can survive staying in this country, MY country, to fight and love and use my embarrassment of blessings to do what’s right."
Shameless loudmouth coward. I was looking forward to the mass exodus of SJW leaving.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea who either is.

EDIT: Now that I checked and now know who they are...I could care less.
 
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.

She's kind of an idiot, but she's not a malicious troll like Milo is.
 
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.

Both are whiny, sniveling a-holes. One admitted to molesting her sister when both were kids. The other thinks it's OK to molest kids as an adult. So, in that Milo has the edge on creepy. But, I'm not a fan of either one, and I hate Lena's tv show with a passion.

Equally horrific human beings.
 
Milo is a miserable troll with genuinely awful positions (unless those are all pretense, but then, **** him anyway). And while trolls are assholes, "asshole" is bigger on a Venn, and he fits the other qualifications as well.

Lena is a part-troll who has confused herself with an artist. To the extent her political beliefs have been inadvertently learned by myself, they have generally been overblown vapidity.




Milo is worse. I would like these people to go away and leave us alone.
 
Milo is a miserable troll with genuinely awful positions (unless those are all pretense, but then, **** him anyway). And while trolls are assholes, "asshole" is bigger on a Venn, and he fits the other qualifications as well.

Lena is a part-troll who has confused herself with an artist. To the extent her political beliefs have been inadvertently learned by myself, they have generally been overblown vapidity.




Milo is worse. I would like these people to go away.

Milo actions are definitely worse, but I hate them both about equally.
 
Milo actions are definitely worse, but I hate them both about equally.

Since you responded before my edits, the point about Lena's childhood misdeed:



One admitted to molesting her sister when both were kids..

I heard about that, but wasn't it age 4 or something? I certainly never did anything like that, but honestly, we're talking about a time when a human has just barely entered the realms of consciousness and self-consciousness. Children are bathed with each other in plenty of homes at that age. There is no concept of sexuality at that point. They still have the slightest grasp on things like words and meanings.

If I've got the age wrong, my opinion may change. I didn't pay too much attention to it because I don't like paying attention to her.
 
Dunham is far worse that Milo could ever be.
 
It is not anonymous. If you vote your name will appear.

yeah my bad, I jumped the gun, I guess i clicked on it and didn't see any names because no one had voted.
 
Why do I gotta think about who is worse between the two?

I know less than 30 seconds about either of them.

They are not even on my radar.
 
I would say that neither is significantly more appealing than the other. They're both kind of like Mini-Trump and Mini-Hillary respectively.
 
SORRY; I DON'T GET OUT MUCH (OTHER THAN TO HANGOUT WITH FRIENDS, SMOKE DOPE & CIGARS, GO TO BARS TO HAVE ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF FUN WITH FRIENDS & STRANGERS, GO TO CONCERTS WHICH IS MY FAVE, HAVE ANONOMOUS SEX IN BUYOUS WITH FRESHWATER MERMAIDS SURROUNDED BY VOYERISTIC ALLIGATORS, PLAY GUITAR, DRIVE MY EUROPEAN AUTOS, etc.) .......... so who are these two people? I have never heard of them ........ like I said, I don't get out much .......... where is the next party? .............
 
Last edited:
Because she actually acted on it, while Milo just talked about it.

You do know she was a minor at the time she did those things. Right? I think she was 7 or so. wtf?

If you are saying Milo has the mind of a 7 year old...I might agree with ya there.
 
The choices you have are:

Lena Dunham

VS

Milo Yiannopoulos

These are two people on each side of the very polarized extreme views of new agey millennial politics out there today. So who do you think is worse? I put these two together because they have each done and said some really bizarre things and have found an audience for it along with some amount of fame and fortune. I really hope that these two are not the future of political activism, because if they are. It just goes against everything I think activism should be and only strengthens my arguments against activism in general.

Doing is always worse than talking.
 
She's kind of an idiot, but she's not a malicious troll like Milo is.

She has admitted to molesting her little sister.

Her actions are worse than Milos words.
 
yeah my bad, I jumped the gun, I guess i clicked on it and didn't see any names because no one had voted.

I voted and I don't see any names.
 
You do know she was a minor at the time she did those things. Right? I think she was 7 or so. wtf?

If you are saying Milo has the mind of a 7 year old...I might agree with ya there.

This is the person you are defending? Actions are worse than words.

In her newly published collection of personal essays, Not That Kind of Girl, Lena Dunham describes experimenting sexually with her younger sister Grace, whom she says she attempted to persuade to kiss her using “anything a sexual predator might do.” In one particularly unsettling passage, Dunham experimented with her six-year younger sister’s vagina. “This was within the spectrum of things I did,” she writes.


In the collection of nonfiction personal accounts, Dunham describes using her little sister at times essentially as a sexual outlet, bribing her to kiss her for prolonged periods and even masturbating while she is in the bed beside her. But perhaps the most disturbing is an account she proudly gives of an episode that occurred when she was seven and her sister was one. Here’s the full passage (p. 158-9):

“Do we all have uteruses?” I asked my mother when I was seven.
“Yes,” she told me. “We’re born with them, and with all our eggs, but they start out very small. And they aren’t ready to make babies until we’re older.” I look at my sister, now a slim, tough one-year-old, and at her tiny belly. I imagined her eggs inside her, like the sack of spider eggs in Charlotte’s Web, and her uterus, the size of a thimble.
“Does her vagina look like mine?”
“I guess so,” my mother said. “Just smaller.”
One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked.
My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”
My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just got on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success.

Lena Dunham Describes Sexually Abusing Her Little Sister | Truth Revolt
 
I know next to nothing about either of those people and I get the distinct feeling I want to keep it that way. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom