- Joined
- Oct 21, 2015
- Messages
- 53,813
- Reaction score
- 10,864
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Every election someone runs against the "establishment". It is how Reagan won, its how Clinton won, its how Bush won, its how Obama won, and its how Trump won. What do you think that is a new phenomena?
Once again, Trump won with a lower percentage of the popular vote than Romney lost with in 2012. Hell had Romney been the candidate in 2016, it would have been a bigger wave election for the Republicans. The problem the Democrats had is:
1. Their candidate was Hillary Clinton.
2. They dropped the old 50 state strategy of Howard Dean's DNC and have gotten killed in state and congressional elections as a result.
As to Obama not changing Washington, that is about 10% Obama and 90% the obstructionist GOP in congress. Obama left office as a very popular president, had he been allowed to run again, he would have won. You think there was some compromise "meet in the middle" to be had between the Obama Administration and the Republicans in congress?
Look at the actual demographics that voted for Trump in terms of income, religion, where they live and so on. It's the same people that always vote Republican.
McCain ran against the establishment and lost. Romney ran against the establishment and lost. You seem to think we would have a new president every four years because anyone who runs against the establishment wins. You don't really understand what the establishment actually is but between Hillary and Trump there was no question as to who was the establishment and who was not. We have just begun a period of change and no one has a working crystal ball. But, it is up to the Democrats to challenge Trump in 2020 with someone who would not be an Obama third term or a Hillary first term. The place they should really start is getting rid of the superdelegates and have a fair primary that is not rigged and let the voters actually decide who they want as their nominee and they need to quit having intolerance for anyone who disagrees with them while trying to hypocritically claim that the other side is intolerant.