- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 25,803
- Reaction score
- 20,579
- Location
- Austin, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Irrelevant.
We have the evidence to go on.
I accept the evidence that is uncontested by other evidence.
That is how this works, unlike say making things up to believe like saying; "Zimmerman was warned by the police dispatcher not to intervene."
You see, in order
Unable to accept reality is a flaw that resides with them.
:lamo
No. He acted in self defense.
Nothing exists to contradict that.
You mistake being pro-law, pro-evidence, pro-legal argument and anti-false claim, with being pro-Zimmerman.
That is not what you previous post says.
The fact that you failed to address it's refutation also says otherwise.
Ex, you use "that's irrelevant" more time than Bayer has aspirins.
I really don't care what you think is irrelevant. You still don't personally definitively know what happened. That's a fact.